Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death

Transplant International

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 548-554

  Treckmann, Jürgen ^a   Moers, Cyril ^b   Smits, Jacqueline M ^c   Gallinat, Anja ^a   Maathuis, Mark Hugo J ^b   Van Kasterop Kutz, Margitta ^c   Jochmans, Ina ^d   Homan Van Der Heide, Jaap J ^b   Squifflet, Jean Paul ^e   Van Heurn, Ernest ^f   Kirste, Günter R ^g   Rahmel, Axel ^c   Leuvenink, Henri G D ^b   Pirenne, Jacques ^d   Ploeg, Rutger J ^b   Paul, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c EUROTRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation   (Germany)

Author keywords

donation; expanded donor pool; kidney; organ preservation and procurement; outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; MACHINE PERFUSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESERVATION AND STORAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN DEATH; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PERFUSION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79955569761     PISSN: 09340874     EISSN: 14322277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01232.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA, et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281.
2. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM,. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 (Suppl. 4): 114.
3. Pascual J, Zamora J, Pirsch JD,. A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 52: 553.
4. Daly PJ, Power RE, Healy DA, Hickey DP, Fitzpatrick JM, Watson RW,. Delayed graft function: a dilemma in renal transplantation. BJU Int 2005; 96: 498.
5. McLaren AJ, Jassem W, Gray DW, Fuggle SV, Welsh KI, Morris PJ,. Delayed graft function: risk factors and the relative effects of early function and acute rejection on long-term survival in cadaveric renal transplantation. Clin Transplant 1999; 13: 266.
6. Troppmann C, Gillingham KJ, Benedetti E, et al. Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The multivariate analysis. Transplantation 1995; 59: 962.
7. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 589.
8. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, Brewer N,. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1.
9. Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N,. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 293.
10. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 7.
11. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249.
12. Boom H, de Fijter J,. Delayed graft function in renal transplantation. Transplant Rev 2004; 18: 139.
13. Saidi RF, Elias N, Kawai T, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death kidneys: realities and costs. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 2769.
14. Moore J, Tan K, Cockwell P, et al. Predicting early renal allograft function using clinical variables. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2669.
15. Buchanan PM, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR,. Association of lower costs of pulsatile machine perfusion in renal transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2391.
16. Matsuoka L, Shah T, Aswad S, et al. Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1473.
17. Stratta RJ, Moore PS, Farney AC, et al. Influence of pulsatile perfusion preservation on outcomes in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 873; discussion 82.
18. Jochmans I, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. Renal resistance during machine perfusion is a risk factor for delayed graft function and poorer graft survival. Am J Transplant 2010; 10 (Suppl 4): 107.
19. Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Kapur S, Stubenbord WT, Kinkhabwala M,. Calcium ion concentration of machine perfusate predicts early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. Transpl Int 1999; 12: 378.
20. Polyak M, Boykin J, Arrington B, Stubenbord WT, Kinkhabwala M,. Pulsatile preservation characteristics predict early graft function in extended criteria donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 3582.
21. Hosgood SA, Yang B, Bagul A, Mohamed IH, Nicholson ML,. A comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in an experimental model of renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2010; 89: 830.
22. Yuan X, Theruvath AJ, Ge X, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in organ transplantation: indication, mechanisms, and future perspectives. Transpl Int 2010; 23: 561.
23. Nyberg SL, Baskin-Bey ES, Kremers W, Prieto M, Henry ML, Stegall MD,. Improving the prediction of donor kidney quality: deceased donor score and resistive indices. Transplantation 2005; 80: 925.