Multiple mating and its relationship to brood size in pregnant fishes versus pregnant mammals and other viviparous vertebrates

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 7091-7095

  Avise, John C ^a   Liu, Jin Xian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fecundity; Genetic parentage analysis; Mating systems; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FAMILY SIZE; FERTILITY; FISH; MAMMAL; MATING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PARENTAGE ANALYSIS; PATERNITY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPTILE; SEXUAL SELECTION; VERTEBRATE; VIVIPARITY;

ANIMALS; CLUTCH SIZE; FEMALE; FISHES; MALE; MAMMALS; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREGNANCY; VIVIPARITY, NONMAMMALIAN;

AMPHIBIA; MAMMALIA; PISCES; REPTILIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79955567502     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1103329108     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Parker GA, Baker RR, Smith VGF (1972) The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J Theor Biol 36:529-553.
2. Avise JC (2011) Hermaphroditism: The Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Dual Sexuality (Columbia University Press, New York).
3. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
4. Jones AG, Avise JC (2001) Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: Insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. J Hered 92:150-158. (Pubitemid 32521986)
5. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svennson I (1986) Reversed sex roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of two pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 29: 209-215.
6. Rosenqvist G (1993) Sex role reversal in a pipefish. Mar Freshwat Behav Physiol 23: 219-230.
7. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Arnold SJ, Avise JC (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc Biol Sci 267: 677-680. (Pubitemid 30197838)
8. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997) Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Mol Ecol 6:203-213. (Pubitemid 27132309)
9. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997) Polygynandry in the duskey pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution 51:1611-1622. (Pubitemid 27491156)
10. Jones AG, Kvarnemo C, Moore GI, Simmons LW, Avise JC (1998) Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus. Mol Ecol 7:1497-1505. (Pubitemid 28510174)
11. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Avise JC (1999) The genetic mating system of a sex-role-reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): A molecular inquiry. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:357-365. (Pubitemid 129748807)
12. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA (2002) Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: Lessons for ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 36:19-45. (Pubitemid 36109182)
13. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971, ed Campbell B (Aldine, Chicago), pp 136-179.
14. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
15. Wade MJ, Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice and sperm precedence. Anim Behav 28:446-461.
16. Wade MJ, Shuster SM (2010) Bateman (1948): Pioneer in the measurement of sexual selection. Heredity 105:507-508.
17. Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am Nat 143:317-348.
18. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223. (Pubitemid 8130430)
19. Jones AG (2009) On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63:1673-1684.
20. Avise JC, Liu JX (2010) Multiple mating and its relationship to alternative modes of gestation in male-pregnant versus female-pregnant fish species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:18915-18920.
21. Yasui Y (1998) The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol Evol 13:246-250.
22. Yasui Y (2001) Female multiple mating as a genetic bet-hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecol Res 16:605-616.
23. Møller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc Biol Sci 266: 85-91. (Pubitemid 29039279)
24. Byers JA, Waits L (2006) Good genes sexual selection in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16343-16345. (Pubitemid 44715198)
25. Neff BD, Pitcher TE, Ramnarine IW (2008) Inter-population variation in multiple paternity and reproductive skew in the guppy. Mol Ecol 17:2975-2984. (Pubitemid 351793542)
26. Wourms JP (1981) Viviparity: The maternal-fetal relationship in fishes. Am Zool 21: 473-515.
27. Serbezov D, Bernatchez L, Olsen EM, Vøllestad LA (2010) Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population. Mol Ecol 19: 3193-3205.
28. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2000) Ecological determinants and temporal stability of the within-river population structure in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol Ecol 9:615-628. (Pubitemid 30259527)
29. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 12:2511-2523. (Pubitemid 37195892)