Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1497-1505

  Jones, Adam G ^a   Kvarnemo, Charlotta ^b   Moore, Glenn I ^b   Simmons, Leigh W ^b   Avise, John C ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Linkage disequilibrium; Mating system; Parentage; Pipefish; Sex role reversal; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOTYPE; MATING SYSTEM; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA PRIMERS; FEMALE; FISHES; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PREGNANCY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; WESTERN AUSTRALIA;

EID: 0032213870     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00481.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ahnesjö I (1995) Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 229-233.
2. Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. Bennett JH, Hayman DL, Hope RM (1986) Novel sex differences in linkage values and meiotic chromosome behaviour in a marsupial. Nature, 323, 59-60.
4. Berglund A (1991) Egg competition in a sex-role reversed pipefish: subordinant females trade reproduction for growth. Evolution, 45, 770-774.
5. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (1993) Selective males and ardent females in pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 331-336.
6. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Bernet P (1997) Ornamentation predicts reproductive success in female pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 145-150.
7. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I (1986) Reversed sex roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of two pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 29, 209-215.
8. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I (1988) Multiple matings and paternal brood care in the pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Oikos, 51, 184-188.
9. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I (1989) Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. American Naturalist, 133, 506-516.
10. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London.
11. Blakey JK (1994) Genetic evidence for extra-pair fertilizations in a monogamous passerine, the Great Tit Parus major. Ibis, 136, 457-462.
12. Burley NT, Parker PG, Lundy K (1996) Sexual selection and extra-pair fertilization in a socially monogamous passerine, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behavioral Ecology, 7, 218-226.
13. Chakraborty R, Hedrick PW (1983) Paternity exclusion and the paternity index for two linked loci. Human Heredity, 33, 13-23.
14. Chakraboity R, Meagher TR, Smouse PE (1988) Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics, 118, 527-536.
15. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 437-456.
16. n microsatellites and its potential for assessment of mating success. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 53, 342-349.
17. Davisson MT, Roderick TH (1981) Recombination percentages. In: (Green MC ed.) Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart.
18. Decker MD, Parker PG, Minchella DJ, Rabenold KN (1993) Monogamy in black vultures: genetic evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 29-35.
19. Dickinson J, Haydock J, Koenig W, Stanback M, Pitelka F (1995) Genetic monogamy in single-male groups of acorn woodpeckers, Melanerpesformicivorus. Molecular Ecology, 4, 765-769.
20. Donis-Keller H, Green P, Helms C et al. (1987) A genetic linkage map of the human genome. Cell, 51, 319-337.
21. Gloor G, Engels W (1992) Single-fly DNA preps for PCR. Drosophila Information Service, 71, 148-149.
22. Haresign TW, Shumway SE (1981) Permeability of the marsupium of the pipefish Syngnathus fuscus to [14C]-alpha amino isobutyric acid. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 69A, 603-604.
23. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
24. Hedrick PW (1985) Genetics of Populations. Jones & Bartlett, Portola Valley, California.
25. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997a) Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Molecular Ecology, 6, 203-213.
26. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997b) Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution, 51, 1611-1622.
27. Jones AG, Östlund-Nilsson S, Avise JC (1998) A microsatellite assessment of sneaked fertilizations and egg thievery in the fifteenspine stickleback. Evolution, 52, 848-858.
28. Kellogg KA, Markert JA, Stauffer JR, Kocher TD (1995) Microsatellite variation demonstrates multiple paternity in lekking cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 260, 79-84.
29. Lifjeld JT, Dunn PO, Robertson RJ, Boag PT (1993) Extra-pair paternity in monogamous tree swallows. Animal Behaviour, 45, 213-229.
30. Masonjones HD, Lewis SM (1996) Courtship behavior in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae. Copeia, 1996, 634-640.
31. Mauck RA, Waite TA, Parker PG (1995) Monogamy in Leach's Storm-Petrel: DNA-fingerprinting evidence. The Auk, 112, 473-482.
32. Morgan TH (1914) No crossing over in the male of Drosophila of genes in the second and third pair of chromosomes. Biological Bulletin, 26, 195-204.
33. Pàldi A, Gyapay G, Jami J (1995) Imprinted chromosomal regions of the human genome display sex-specific meiotic recombination frequencies. Current Biology, 5, 1030-1035.
34. Parker A, Kornfield I (1996) Polygynandry in Pseudotropheus zebra, a cichlid fish from Lake Malawi. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 47, 345-352.
35. Parker GA, Simmons LW (1996) Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 263, 315-321.
36. Price TD, Alatalo RV, Charlesworth B et al. (1987) Constraints on the effects of sexual selection. In: (Bradbury JW, Andersson MB eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Wiley, Chichester.
37. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (vers. 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
38. Rosenqvist G (1990) Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis ophidion. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1110-1115.
39. Rosenqvist G (1993) Sex role reversal in a pipefish. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 23, 219-230.
40. Smouse PE, Chakraborty R (1986) The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 38, 918-939.
41. Tazima Y (1964) The Genetics of the Silkworm. Prentice, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
42. Thompson EA, Deeb S, Walker D, Motulsky AG (1988) The detection of linkage disequilibrium between closely linked markers: RFLPs at the AI-CIII apolipoprotein genes. American Journal of Human Genetics, 42, 113-124.
43. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: (Campbell B ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
44. van Oorschot RAH, Porter PA, Kammerer CM, VandeBerg JL (1992) Severely reduced recombination in females of the South American marsupial Monodelphis domestica. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 60, 64-67.
45. Vincent ACJ (1994a) Seahorses exhibit conventional sex roles in mating competition, despite male pregnancy. Behaviour, 128, 135-151.
46. Vincent AQ (1994b) Operational sex ratios in seahorses. Behaviour, 128, 153-167.
47. Vincent A, Ahnesjö I, Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (1992) Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 237-241.
48. Vincent AQ, Sadler LM (1995) Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1557-1569.
49. Wallace RA, Selman K (1981) Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. American Zoologist, 21, 325-343.
50. Westneat DV Webster MS (1994) Molecular analyses of kinship in birds: interesting questions and useful techniques. In: (Scheirwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, Desalle R eds) Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland.
51. Williams GC (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
52. Yezerinac SM, Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT (1995) Extra-pair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 179-188.