In situ analysis of three-dimensional electrolyte convection evolving during the electrodeposition of copper in magnetic gradient fields

Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 83, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3275-3281

  Tschulik, Kristina ^a,b   Cierpka, Christian ^c   Gebert, Annett ^a   Schultz, Ludwig ^a,b   Kähler, Christian J ^c   Uhlemann, Margitta ^a  

^a IFW DRESDEN   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BULK ELECTROLYTES; COMPLEX INTERACTION; CONVECTIVE EFFECTS; DIFFUSION LIMITED; ELECTROLYTE CONVECTION; ELECTROLYTE FLOWS; FLUID MOTIONS; HIGH-GRADIENT MAGNETIC FIELD; IN-SITU ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT FORCES; MAGNETIC FORCE; MAGNETIC GRADIENT; MAGNETIC GRADIENT FIELD; NORMAL FLOW; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; PARTICLE TRACKING VELOCIMETRY; RADIAL VELOCITY; SPATIALLY RESOLVED; WORKING ELECTRODE;

ELECTRODEPOSITION; ELECTROLYTES; LORENTZ FORCE; MAGNETISM; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS;

EID: 79955566468     PISSN: 00032700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ac102763m     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fahidy, T. Z. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1983, 13, 553-563
2. Tacken, R. A.; Janssen, L. J. J. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1995, 25, 1-5
3. Coey, J. M. D.; Hinds, G. J. Alloys Compd. 2001, 326, 238-245
4. Weston, M. C.; Gerner, M. D.; Fritsch, I. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3411-3418
5. Tschulik, K.; Koza, J. A.; Uhlemann, M.; Gebert, A.; Schultz, L. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2241-2244
6. Mutschke, G.; Tschulik, K.; Weier, T.; Uhlemann, M.; Bund, A.; Fröehlich, F. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 9060-9066
7. Tschulik, K.; Sueptitz, R.; Koza, J.; Uhlemann, M.; Mutschke, G.; Weier, T.; Gebert, A.; Schultz, L. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 56, 297-304
8. Leventis, N.; Gao, X. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3981-3992
9. Grant, K. M.; Hemmert, J. W.; White, H. S. Electrochem. Commun. 1999, 1, 319-323
10. Ragsdale, S. R.; White, H. S. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 1923-1927
11. Pullins, M. D.; Grant, K. M.; White, H. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8989-8994
12. Grant, K. M.; Hemmert, J. W.; White, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 462-467
13. Leventis, N.; Dass, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4988-4989
14. Arumugam, P. U.; Clark, E. A.; Fritsch, I. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 1167-1171
15. Coey, J. M. D.; Aogaki, R.; Byrne, F.; Stamenov, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 8811-8817
16. Anderson, E. C.; Weston, M. C.; Fritsch, I. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2643-2651
17. Aguilar, Z. P.; Arumugam, P.; Fritsch, I. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 591, 201-209
18. -. The amount of oxygen that is dissolved in an electrolyte under ambient conditions is small (typically 8 ppm), and hence, the slight shift of the electrolytes pH due the reduction of oxygen does not affect further reactions at the WE.
19. Cierpka, C.; Segura, R.; Hain, R.; Kähler, C. J. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 045401
20. Cierpka, C.; Rossi, M.; Segura, R.; Kähler, C. J. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 015401
21. Baehr, H. D.; Stephan, K. Wärme- und Stoffübertragung, 6 th ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
22. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84 th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
23. Cierpka, C.; Weier, T.; Gerbeth, G.; Uhlemann, M.; Eckert, K. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2007, 11, 687-701
24. Bödewadt, U. T. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 1940, 20, 241-253
25. Einstein, A. Naturwissenschaften 1926, 14, 223-224
26. 2(g) bubbles can be safely excluded, since the CE is placed at the top of the electrochemical cell.