Clinical implications of using the arm motor ability test in stroke rehabilitation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 830-836

  O'Dell, Michael W ^a,b   Kim, Grace ^a   Finnen, Lisa Rivera ^a   Polistena, Caitlin ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Hemiplegia; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARM MOTOR ABILITY TEST; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EFFECT SIZE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF MOVEMENT; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; RELIABILITY; ROBOTICS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; VALIDITY; VIDEORECORDING; WRIST;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARM; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE;

EID: 79955565939     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A.W. Dromerick, C.E. Lang, and M.S. Birkenmeier Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS) Neurology 73 2009 195 201
2. S.L. Wolf, C.J. Weinstein, and J.P. Miller Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomized trial Lancet Neurol 7 2008 33 40 (Pubitemid 50013946)
3. S. Hesse Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review NeuroRehabilitation 23 2008 55 65 (Pubitemid 352038562)
4. G. Kwakkel, B.J. Krollen, and H.I. Krebs Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systemic review Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 2008 111 121 (Pubitemid 351287594)
5. R.L. Harvey, C.J. Winstein Everest Trial Group Design for the Everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1 2009 32 44
6. D.J. Edwards On the understanding and development of modern physical neurorehabilitation methods: robotics and non-invasive brain stimulation J Neuroeng Rehabil 6 2009 3 6
7. M.W. O'Dell, C.C. Lin, and V. Harrison Stroke rehabilitation: strategies to enhance motor recovery Annu Rev Med 60 2009 55 68
8. J.W. Krakauer Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery Semin Neurol 25 2005 384 395
9. World Health Organization (WHO) International classification of impairments, activities, and participation 1997 World Health Organization Geneva
10. A.M. Jette, and S.M. Haley Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment J Rehabil Med 37 2005 339 345 (Pubitemid 41823728)
11. G. Kwakkel, B. Kollen, and E. Lindeman Understanding the patterns and functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories Restor Neurol Neurosci 22 2004 281 299 (Pubitemid 39480654)
12. Y.W. Hsieh, C.Y. Wu, K.C. Lin, Y.F. Chang, C.L. Chen, and J.S. Liu Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation Stroke 40 2009 1386 1391
13. N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S.C. Cramer A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22 2008 78 90 (Pubitemid 350223140)
14. S.L. Wolf, P.A. Catlin, M. Ellis, A.L. Archer, B. Morgan, and A. Piacentino Assessing the Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for research in patients after stroke Stroke 32 2001 1635 1639 (Pubitemid 32631916)
15. F. Mahoney, and D.W. Barthel Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index Md State Med J 14 1965 61 65
16. Anonymous Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation (adult FIM) 1994 State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo Version 4.0
17. K.L. McCulloch, E.W. Cook III, W.C. Fleming, T.A. Novack, and E. Taub A reliable test of upper extremity ADL function [abstract] Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69 1988 755
18. E. Taub, N.E. Miller, and T.A. Novack Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 1993 347 354 (Pubitemid 23115348)
19. A. Kunkel, B. Kopp, and G. Miller Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 1999 624 628 (Pubitemid 29269642)
20. B. Kopp, A. Kunkel, and H. Flor The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78 1997 615 620 (Pubitemid 27259886)
21. J. Chae, I. Labatia, and G. Yang Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis: concurrent validity of the Arm Motor Ability Test Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82 2003 1 8 (Pubitemid 36043756)
22. J.J. Daly, N. Hogan, and E.M. Perepezko Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke J Rehabil Res Dev 42 2005 723 736 (Pubitemid 43793502)
23. J. Chae, D.T. Yu, and M.E. Walker Intramuscular electrical stimulation for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a 12-month follow-up of a multiple-center, randomized clinical trial Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84 2005 832 842 (Pubitemid 41546723)
24. J. Chae, A. Ng, and D.T. Yu Intramuscular electrical stimulation for shoulder pain in hemiplegia: does time from stroke onset predict treatment success? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21 2007 561 567 (Pubitemid 47585202)
25. R. Levy, S. Ruland, M. Weinand, D. Lowry, R. Dafer, and R. Bakay Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiplegic stroke: a multi-center feasibility study of safety and efficacy J Neurosurg 108 2008 707 714 (Pubitemid 351498966)
26. J. Chae, M.Y. Harley, and T.Z. Hisel Intramuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory randomized clinical trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23 2009 569 578
27. J. Chae, G. Yang, B.K. Park, and I. Labatia Delay in initiation and termination of muscle contraction, motor impairment, and physical disability in upper limb hemiparesis Muscle Nerve 25 2002 568 575 (Pubitemid 34293132)
28. J. Chae, G. Yang, B.K. Park, and I. Labatia Muscle weakness and cocontraction in upper limb hemiparesis: relationship to motor impairment and physical disability Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16 2002 241 248 (Pubitemid 34984899)
29. S. Allin, and D. Ramanan Assessment of post-stroke functioning using machine vision IAPR Conference on Machine Vision Applications. 2007 May; Tokyo (Japan) http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/∼ley/db/conf/mva/index.html Accessed January 20, 2011
30. J.K. Rinehart, J.C. Singleton, J.R. Adair, J.R. Sadek, and K.Y. Haaland Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference Stroke 40 2009 545 550
31. D.L. Streiner, and G.R. Norman Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 3rd ed. 2003 Oxford University Pr London
32. J. Kirk, and M.L. Miller Reliability and validity in qualitative research 1986 Sage Newbury Park
33. A. Jette Concepts of health and methodological issues in functional assessment C.V. Granger, G.E. Gresham, Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine 1984 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore 46 64
34. G. Guyatt, S. Walter, and G. Norman Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis 40 1987 171 178 (Pubitemid 17007065)
35. C.E. Lang, D.F. Edwards, R.L. Birkenmeier, and A.W. Dromerick Estimated minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 2008 1693 1700
36. B.R. Brewer, R. Klatzky, and Y. Matsuoka Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation Brain Res Bull 75 2008 804 813