The trouble with resits

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 243-251

  Pell, Godfrey ^a   Boursicot, Katherine ^b   Roberts, Trudie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical assessment; Criterion based assessment; OSCE; Resits; Standard setting

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955562093     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930801955994     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Cizek, G.J., ed. 2001. Setting performance standards. Mahwah, NJ: Lawernce Earlbaum.
2. Crooks, T. 2006. Excellence in assessment for accountability purposes. Key note speech, EARLISIG Assessment Conference, Darlington.
3. Goldstein, H. 2004. Measuring educational standards. Significance 1, no. 4: 103-05.
4. Kramer, A., A. Muijtjens, J. Koos, H. Dusman, L. Tan, and C. van der Vleuten. 2003. Comparison of a rational and empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE. Medical Education 37, no. 2: 132-39.
5. Pell, G., and T.E. Roberts. 2006. Setting standards for student assessment. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 29, no. 1: 91-104.
6. Rothman, A.I., D. Blackmore, R. Cohen, and R. Reznik. 1996. The consistency and uncertainty in examiner's definitions of pass/fail performance on OSCE stations. Evaluation and the Health Professions 19, no. 1: 118-224.