Automatic removal of high-amplitude stimulus artefact from neuronal signal recorded in the subthalamic nucleus

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 198, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 135-146

  Al ani, Tarik ^a,b,c   Cazettes, Fanny ^c   Palfi, Stéphane ^d   Lefaucheur, Jean Pascal ^d,e  

^a Universite de Versailles Saint Quentin   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

^c ESIEE PARIS   (France)

^d HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^e FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE   (France)

Author keywords

Deep brain stimulation; Ensemble empirical mode decomposition; Motor cortex stimulation; Parkinson's disease; Stimulus artefact

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURONS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PARKINSON DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

EID: 79955556398     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Balocchi P., Menicucci D., Santarcangelo E., Sebastiani L., Gemignani A., Ghelarducci B., et al. Deriving the respiratory sinus arrhythmia from the heartbeat time series using empirical mode decomposition. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2004, 20:171-177.
2. Benabid A.L., Chabardes S., Mitrofanis J., Pollak P. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8:67-81.
3. Benazzouz A., Gao D.M., Ni Z.G., Piallat B., Bouali-Benazzouz R., Benabid A.L. Effect of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on the neuronal activities of the substantia nigra pars reticulata and ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus in the rat. Neuroscience 2000, 289-295.
4. Benazzouz A., Breit S., Koudsie A., Pollak P., Krack P., Benabid A.L. Intraoperative microrecordings of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2002, 17(Suppl. 3):S145-S149.
5. Black R.C., Clark G.M., ÓLeary S.J., Walters C. Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1983, 399:5-17.
6. Blanco-Velasco M., Weng B., Barner K.E. ECG signal denoising and baseline wander correction based on the empirical mode decomposition. Comput Biol Med 2008, 38:1-13.
7. Blogg T., Reid W.D. A digital technique for stimulus artifact reduction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 76:557-561.
8. Drouot X., Oshino S., Jarraya B., Besret L., Kishima H., Remy P., et al. Functional recovery in a primate model of Parkinson's disease following motor cortex stimulation. Neuron 2004, 44:769-778.
9. Epstein C.M. A simple artifact-rejection preamplifier for clinical neurophysiology. Am EEG Technol 1995, 35:64-71.
10. Echevarría J.C., Crowe J.A., Woolfso M.S., Hayes-Gill B.R. Application of empirical mode decomposition to heart rate variability analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2001, 39:471-479.
11. Erfanian A., Chizeck H.J., Hashemi R.M. Using evoked EMG as a synthetic force sensor of isometric electrically stimulated muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998, 45:188-202.
12. Flandrin P., Rilling G., Goncalves P. Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2004, 11:112-114.
13. Flandrin P., Goncalves P., Rilling G. Detrending and denoising with empirical mode decomposition. Proceedings of XIIth EUSIPCO, 2004 2004.
14. Freeman J.A. An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1971, 31:170-172.
15. Gnadt J., Echols S., Yildirim A., Zhang H., Paul K. Spectral cancellation of micros-timulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003, 50:1129-1135.
16. Gradinaru V., Mogri M., Thompson K.R., Henderson J.M., Deisseroth K. Optical deconstruction of parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science 2009, 324:354-359.
17. Gang L., Xinwei W., Lihua S. On EMD based adaptive de-noising method for signal processing. J Adv Sci 2006, 18(1/2):144-151.
18. Hammond C., Ammari R., Bioulac B., Garcia L. Latest view on the mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 2008, 23:2111-2121.
19. Handa T., Takahashi H., Saito C., Handa Y., Ichie M., Kameyama J., et al. Development of an FES system controlled by EMG signals. Proceedings of the IEEE 20th Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1999.
20. Harding G.W. A method for eliminating the stimulus artifact from digital recordings of the direct cortical response. Comp Biomed Res 1991, 24:183-195.
21. Hashimoto T., Elder C., Vitek J. A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 113:181-186.
22. Hashimoto T., Elder C.M., Okun M.S., Patrick S.K., Vitek J.L. Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons. J Neurosci 2003, 23:1916-1923.
23. Heffer L.F., Fallon J.B. A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 170:277-284.
24. Hutchison W.D., Allan R.J., Opitz H., Levy R., Dostrovsky J.O., Lang A.E., et al. Neurophysiological identification of the subthalamic nucleus in surgery for Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 1998, 44:622-628.
25. Huang N.E., Shen Z., Long S.R., Wu M.C., Shih H.H., Zheng Q., et al. The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London 1998, 454:903-995.
26. Huang W., Shen Z., Huang N.E., Fung Y.C. Engineering analysis of biological variables: an example of blood pressure over 1 day. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:4816-4821.
27. Keller T., Curt A., Popovic M.R., Dietz V., Signer A. Grasping in high lesioned tetraplegic subjects using the EMG controlled neuroprosthesis. J Neurol Rehabil 1998, 10:251-255.
28. Kopsinis Y., McLaughlin S. Development of EMD-based denoising methods inspired by wavelet thresholding. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2009, 57(April (4)):1351-1362.
29. Krack P., Batir A., Van Blercom N., Chabardes S., Fraix V., Ardouin C., et al. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:1925-1934.
30. Liang H., Lin Z., McCallum R. Artifact reduction in electrogastrogram based on empirical mode decomposition method. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000, 38:35-41.
31. Liang H., Lin Q.H., Chen J.D.Z. Application of the empirical mode decomposition to the analysis of esophageal manometric data in gastroesophageal reflux disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52:1692-1701.
32. Lieu S., He Q., Gao R.X., Freedson P.\ Empirical mode decomposition applied to tissue artifact removal from respiratory signal. International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2008, 3624-3627.
33. Limousin P., Pollak P., Benazzouz A., Hoffmann D., Le Bas J.F., Broussolle E., et al. Effect of parkinsonian signs and symptoms of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Lancet 1995, 345:91-95.
34. Litvak L., Delgutte B., Eddington D. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J Acoust Soc Am 2001, 110:368-379.
35. Litvak L., Smith Z., Delgutte B., Eddington D. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 114:2066-2078.
36. Mallat S.G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the 619 wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1989, 11(July):674-693.
37. McGill R., Tukey J.W., Larsen W.A. Variations of boxplots. Am Stat 1978, 32:12-16.
38. McGill K.C., Cummins K.L., Dorfman L.J., Berlizot B.B. On the nature and elimination of stimulus artifact in nerve signals evoked and recorded using surface electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1982, 29:129-137.
39. Meignen S., Perrier V. A new formulation for empirical mode decomposition based on constrained optimization. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2007, 14:932-935.
40. Meissner W., Leblois A., Hansel D., Bioulac B., Gross C.E., Benazzouz A., et al. Subthalamic high frequency stimulation resets subthalamic firing and reduces abnormal oscillations. Brain 2005, 128:2372-2382.
41. Minzly J., Mizrahi J., Hakim N., Liberson A. Stimulus artefact suppressor for EMG recording during FES by a constant-current stimulator. Med Biol Eng Comput 1993, 31:72-75.
42. Miller C., Abbas P., Robinson B., Rubinstein J., Matsuoka A. Electrically evoked single fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res 1999, 130:197-218.
43. Miller C., Abbas P., Robinson B., Nourski K., Zhang F., Jeng F. Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006, 7:195-210.
44. Montgomery E., Gale J., Huang H. Methods for isolating extracellular action potentials and removing stimulus artifacts from microelectrode recordings of neurons requiring minimal operator intervention. J Neurosci Methods 2005, 144:107-125.
45. Montgomery E., Gale J. Mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation (DBS). J Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008, 32:388-407.
46. Niazy R.K., Beckmann C.F., Brady J.M., Smith S.M. Performance evaluation of ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Adv Adapt Data Anal 2009, 1(2):231-242.
47. O'Keeffe D.T., Lyons G.M., Donnelly A.E., Byrne C.A. Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm. J Neurosci Methods 2001, 109:137-145.
48. Parsa V., Parker P., Scott R. Convergence characteristics of two algorithms in non-linear stimulus artefact cancellation for electrically evoked potential enhancement. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998, 36:202-214.
49. Pozo F.D., Delgado J.M.R. Hybrid stimulator for chronic experiments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1978, 25:92-94.
50. Pralong E., Ghika J., Temperli P., Pollo C., Vingerhoets F., Villemure J.G. Electrophysiological localization of the subthalamic nucleus in parkinsonian patients. Neurosci Lett 2002, 325:144-146.
51. Roby R.J. A simplified circuit for stimulus artifact suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975, 39:85-87.
52. Salisbury J.I., Sun Y. Assessment of chaotic parameters in nonstationary electrocardiograms by use of empirical mode decomposition. Ann Biomed Eng 2004, 32:1348-1354.
53. Ville J. Théorie et application de la notion de signal analytique. Câbles 637 et Transmissions 1948, 2A:61-74.
54. Wagenaar D., Potter S. Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 120:113-120.
55. Welter M.L., Houeto J.L., Bonnet A.M., Bejjani P.B., Mesnage V., Dormont D., et al. Effects of high-frequency stimulation on subthalamic neuronal activity in parkinsonian patients. Arch Neurol 2004, 61:89-96.
56. Wichmann T. A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments. J Neurosci Methods 2000, 98:57-62.
57. Wu Z., Huang N.E. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise-assisted data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal 2009, 1:1-41.
58. Zhang F., Miller C.A., Robinson B.K., Abbas P.J., Hu N. Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007, 8:356-372.