Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 483-489

  Chatterjee, Prasenjit ^a   Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ^b   Chakraborty, Shankar ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Department of Mechanical Engineering Government Polytechnic ^*  (India)

Author keywords

Concordance matrix; Discordance matrix; ELECTRE; Multi criteria decision making; Robot selection; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MANUFACTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN; ROBOTS;

CONCORDANCE MATRIXES; DISCORDANCE MATRIXES; ELECTRE; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; ROBOT SELECTION; VIKOR;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 79955540489     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bhangale PP, Agrawal VP, Saha SK. Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot. Mech. Mach. Theory 2004;39:1345-66.
2. Goh C-H, Tung Y-CA, Cheng C-H. A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1996;30:193-9.
3. Khouja M, Booth DE. Fuzzy clustering procedure for evaluation and selection of industrial robots. J. Manuf. Syst. 1995;14:244-51.
4. Khouja M. The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1995;28:123-32.
5. Zhao L, Tsujimura Y, Gen M. Genetic algorithm for robot selection and work station assignment problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1996;31:599-602.
6. Baker RC, Talluri S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1997;32:101-8.
7. Goh C-H. Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection. J. Manuf. Syst.;16:381-6.
8. Parkan C, Wu M-L. Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1999;36:503-23.
9. Rao RV, Padmanabhan KK. Selection, identiication and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods. Rob. Computer-Integrated Manuf. 2006;22:373-83.
10. Kahraman C, Cevik S, Ates NY, Gulbay M. Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2007;52:414-33.
11. Karsak EE. Robot selection using an integrated approach based on quality function deployment and fuzzy regression. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2008;46:723-38.
12. Zeleny M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: McGraw Hill; 2002.
13. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004;156: 445-455.
14. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007;178:514-29.
15. Rao RV. Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007.
16. Roy B, Vincke P. Multi-criteria analysis: survey and new directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1981;8:207-18.
17. Cho KT. Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Math. Comput. Modelling 2003;37:1099-119.
18. Milani AS, Shanian A, El-Lahham C. Using different ELECTRE methods in strategic planning in the presence of human behavioral resistance. J. Appl. Math. Dec. Scs. 2006;Article ID 10936:1-19.
19. Chatterjee P, Athawale VM, Chakraborty S. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Mater. Des. 2009;30:4043-53.
20. Hunjak T. Mathematical foundations of the methods for multicriteria decision making. Math. Commun. 1997;2:161-9.