Parents' attitudes toward pediatric genetic testing for common disease risk

Pediatrics

Volumn 127, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Tercyak, Kenneth P ^a   Hensley Alford, Sharon ^b   Emmons, Karen M ^c   Lipkus, Isaac M ^d   Wilfond, Benjamin S ^e   McBride, Colleen M ^f  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Chronic disease; Genetic testing; Parents; Risks and benefits

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FATHER; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MOTHER; ONSET AGE; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC TESTING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARENTS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 79955507522     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0938     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hamilton A. (2008, Oct 30). TIME's best inventions of 2008: invention of the year: the retail DNA test. Time. Available at: www.time.com/time/specials/ packages/completelist/0,,1852747,00.html. Accessed March 2011
2. Multiplex genetic testing: the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998;28(4):15-21
3. Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM. Letting the genome out of the bottle: will we get our wish? N Engl J Med. 2008;358(2):105-107
4. Moore CA, Khoury MJ, Bradley LA. From genetics to genomics: using gene-based medicine to prevent disease and promote health in children. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(3):135-143 (Pubitemid 40909868)
5. McBride CM, Alford SH, Reid RJ, Larson EB, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC. Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions. Genet Med. 2009;11(8):582-587
6. Frueh FW, Gurwitz D. From pharmacogenetics to personalized medicine: a vital need for educating health professionals and the community. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5(5):571-579 (Pubitemid 39023073)
7. Tercyak KP, Tyc VL. Opportunities and challenges in the prevention and control of cancer and other chronic diseases: children's diet and nutrition and weight and physical activity. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31(8):750-763 (Pubitemid 44321665)
8. Darnton-Hill I, Nishida C, James WP. A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1A):101-121 (Pubitemid 38294513)
9. Borry P, Stultiens L, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clin Genet. 2006;70(5):374-381 (Pubitemid 44515636)
10. Duncan RE, Savulescu J, Gillam L, Williamson R, Delatycki MB. An international survey of predictive genetic testing in children for adult onset conditions. Genet Med. 2005;7(6):390-396 (Pubitemid 41139622)
11. Scheuner MT, Sieverding P, Shekelle PG. Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;299(11):1320-1334 (Pubitemid 351439078)
12. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:89-103
13. Omenn GS. Overview of the Symposium on Public Health Significance of Genomics and Eco-Genetics. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:1-8
14. Borry P, Howard HC, Senecal K, Avard D. Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors. Fam Cancer. 2010;9(1):51-59
15. Borry P, Howard HC, Senecal K, Avard D. Direct-to-consumer genome scanning services: also for children? Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):8
16. McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to- consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):3-10
17. Conti R, Veenstra DL, Armstrong K, Lesko LJ, Grosse SD. Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(3):328-340
18. McBride CM, Alford SH, Reid RJ, Larson EB, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC. Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics. Nat Genet. 2008;40(8):939-942
19. Hensley Alford S, McBride CM, Reid RJ, Larson EB, Baxevanis AD, Brody LC. Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group. Public Health Genomics. 2010;[Epub ahead of print]
20. Kaphingst KA, McBride CM, Wade C, Alford SH, Brody LC, Baxevanis AD. Consumers' use of Web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing. J Med Informatics Res. 2010;12(3):e41
21. Wade CH, McBride CM, Kardia SL, Brody LC. Considerations for designing a prototype genetic test for use in translational research. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(3):155-165
22. Burrows KR, Kelley CK. Parental interrater reliability as a function of situational specificity and familiarity of target child. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1983;11(1):41-47 (Pubitemid 13104485)
23. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(3):784-797 (Pubitemid 34640743)
24. Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, Neuwirth K. Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ Res. 1999;80(2 pt 2):S230-S245 (Pubitemid 29143250)
25. Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Brandenburg N. Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;48(5):1279-1289
26. Budtz-Jorgensen E, Keiding N, Grandjean P, Weihe P. Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(1):27-35 (Pubitemid 44920370)
27. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(11):923-936 (Pubitemid 24002359)
28. Geransar R, Einsiedel E. Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: informed choices or buyers beware? Genet Test. 2008;12(1):13-23 (Pubitemid 351457776)
29. McBride CM, Guttmacher AE. Commentary: trailblazing a research agenda at the interface of pediatrics and genomic discovery: a commentary on the psychological aspects of genomics and child health. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(6):662-664
30. Schor EL. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics. 2003;111(6 pt 2):1541-1571
31. Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, Worden JK, Solomon LJ. Psychosocial factors associated with the public's willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(2):157-172 (Pubitemid 32401912)
32. Sanderson SC, Wardle J. Associations between anticipated reactions to genetic test results and interest in genetic testing: will self-selection reduce the potential for harm? Genet Test. 2008;12(1):59-66 (Pubitemid 351457783)
33. Miller SM, Roussi P, Daly MB, et al. Enhanced counseling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: impact on subsequent decision making about risk reduction behaviors. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32(5):654-667 (Pubitemid 41426746)
34. Dorval M, Patenaude AF, Schneider KA, et al. Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility: findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2135-2142 (Pubitemid 30324367)
35. Peshkin BN, DeMarco TA, Garber JE, et al. Brief assessment of parents' attitudes toward testing minor children for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes: development and validation of the Pediatric BRCA1/2 Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS). J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(6):627-638