Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: Informed choices or buyers beware

Genetic Testing

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-23

  Geransar, Rose ^a   Einsiedel, Edna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; HUNTINGTON CHOREA; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; OVARY CANCER; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 41449113701     PISSN: 10906576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0024     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. American College of Medical Genetics (2005) Policy statements. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from: http://www.acmg.net/resources/policy-list.asp.
2. Barrett S, Hall H (2003) Dubious genetic testing. Genewatch UK. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from: http://www.quackwatch.org/QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/ genomics.html.
3. Bates BR, Poirot K, Harris TM, Condit CM, Achter PJ (2004) Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race-based pharmacogenomics: a focus group study of public understanding of applied genomic medication. J Health Commun 9:541-559.
4. Burke W (2002) Genetic testing. N Engl J Med 347:1867-1875.
5. Caulfield T (1998) The commercialization of human genetics: a discussion of issues relevant to the Canadian consumer. J Consum Policy 21:125-167.
6. Caulfield T (1999) Gene testing in the biotech century: are physicians ready? Can Med Assoc J 161:1122-1124.
7. Caulfield TA, Burgess MM, Williams-Jones B, Bail M, Chadwich R, Cho M, Deber R, Fleising U, Flood C, Friedman J, Lank R, Owen T, Sproule J (2001) Providing genetic testing through the private sector - a view from Canada. ISUMA 2(3):72-81. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from: http://www.isuma.net/v02n03/ caulfield/caulfield_e.shtml.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing - Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 53:603-606.
9. Davis JJ (2000) Riskier than we think? The relationship between risk statement completeness and prescriptions of direct to consumer advertised prescription drugs. J Health Commun 5:349-369.
10. Donelle L, Hoffman-Goetz L, Clarke JN (2004) Portrayal of genetic risk for breast cancer in ethnic and non-ethnic newspapers. Women Health 40:93-111.
11. Genetics and Public Policy Centre (2006, September 26) Lax oversight of genetic tests "a risk to public health" - public policy groups file petition for rulemaking with CMS. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from: http://www.dnapolicy.org/news.release.php?action=detail&pressrelease_id=61.
12. Gilbody S, Wilson P, Watt I (2005) Benefits and harms of direct to consumer advertising: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 14:246-250.
13. Gollust SE, Chandros Hull S, Wilfond BS (2002) Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing. J Am Med Assoc 288:1762-1766.
14. Gollust SE, Wilfond BS, Hull SC (2003) Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the internet. Genet Med 5:332-337.
15. Gray S, Olopade OI (2003) Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests for cancer: buyer beware. J Clin Oncol 21:3191-3193.
16. Henneman L, Timmermans DRM, van der Wal G (2004) Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genet 7:33-43.
17. Holtzman NA, Watson MS, eds. (1997) Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States: final report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from: http://www.genome.gov/10001733.
18. Hull SC, Prasad K (2001) Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing in the USA. Reprod Health Matters 9:44-48.
19. Human Genetics Commission (2002) The supply of genetic tests direct to the public: a consultation document.
20. Human Genetics Commission (2003) Genes direct: ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public.
21. Hunter A, Wright P, Cappelli M, Kasaboski A, Surh L (1998) Physician knowledge and attitudes towards molecular genetic (DNA) testing of their patients. Clin Genet 53:447-455.
22. Javitt GH, Hudson K (2006) Federal neglect: regulation of genetic testing. Issues Sci Technol Spring: 59-66 Spring 2006. Retrieved October 6, 2006, from: http://www.dnapolicy.org/resources/Issues_in_Science_and_Technology. pdf#search=%22federal%20neglect%3A%20regulation%20of%20genetic%20testing%22.
23. Ledley F (2002) A consumer charter for genomic services. Nat Biotechnol 20:767.
24. McCabe LL, McCabe ERB (2004) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: access and marketing. Genet Med 6:58-59.
25. McPherson E (2006) Genetic diagnosis and testing in clinical practice. Clin Med Res 4:123-129.
26. Menasha JD, Schechter C, Willner J (2000) Genetic testing: a physician's perspective. Mt Sinai J Med 67:144-151.
27. Mouchawar J, Hensley-Alford S, Laurion S, Ellis J, Kulchak-Rahm A, Finucane ML, Meenan R, Axell L, Pollack R, Ritzwoller D (2005a) Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed care organizations: a naturally-occurring experiment. Genet Med 7:191-197.
28. Mouchawar J, Laurion S, Rizwoller DP, Ellis J, Kulchak-Rahm A, Hensley-Alford S (2005b) Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for heriditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization. Am J Man Care 11:601-608.
29. Mykitiuk R (2004) Caveat emptor: direct-to-consumer supply and advertising of genetic testing. Clin Invest Med 27:23-32.
30. Myriad Genetics (2002, September 12) Myriad Genetics launches direct to consumer advertising campaign for breast cancer test. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from: http://www.myriad.com.
31. National Cancer Institute (2002) Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: it's your choice. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA.
32. National Human Genome Research Institute (2004, March 23). Direct to consumer marketing of genetic tests. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from the National Institutes of Health Web site: http://www.genome.gov/12010659.
33. National Library of Medicine (2006) What is direct-to-consumer genetic testing? Retrieved October 6, 2006, from: http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/ testing/directtoconsumer.
34. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (2000) Enhancing the oversight of genetic tests: recommendations of the SACGT. National Institutes of Health.
35. Taylor MR, Alman A, Manchester DK (2001) Use of the internet by patients and their families to obtain genetics-related information. Mayo Clin Proc 76:772-776.
36. United States Government Accountability Office (2006, June 27) Nutrigenetic testing: tests purchased from four web sites mislead consumers. Retrieved September 2, 2006, from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06977t.pdf.
37. Wade CH, Wilfond BS (2006) Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests. Am J Med Genet 142C:284-292.
38. Wasson K (2006) Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues. Ethics & Med. Retrieved April 30, 2007, from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4004/is_200607/ ai_n17172948.
39. Weigmann K (2004) The code, the text and the language of God. Eur Mol Biol Organ Rep 5:116-118.
40. Welch G, Burke W (1998) Uncertainties in genetic testing for chronic disease. J Am Med Assoc 280:1525-1527.
41. Williams S (2006) Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: empowering or endangering the public? Retrieved January 18, 2007, from the Genetics and Public Policy Centre Web site: http://www.dnapolicy.org/policy.issue.php?action= detail&issuebrief_id=32.
42. Williams-Jones B (1999) Re-framing the discussion: commercial genetic testing in Canada. Health Law J 7:49-67.
43. Williams-Jones B (2003) Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the internet. Community Genet 6:46-57.
44. Williams-Jones B (2006) "Be ready against cancer now": direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing. New Genet Soc 25:89-107.
45. Wolfberg AJ (2006) Genes on the web-direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing. N Engl J Med 355:543-545.