Hypnosis and the control of attention: Where to from here?

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 321-324

  MacLeod, Colin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MODULATION; NOTE; READING; STROOP TEST;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; STROOP TEST; SUGGESTION;

EID: 79955481389     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.007     Document Type: Note

References (25)

1. Cohen Kadosh R., Henik A., Catena A., Walsh V., Fuentes L.J. Induced cross-modal synaesthetic experience without abnormal neuronal connections. Psychological Science 2009, 20:258-265.
2. Cox R.E., Bryant R.A. Advances in hypnosis research: Methods, designs and contributions of intrinsic and instrumental hypnosis. The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice 2008, 311-336. Oxford University Press, New York. M.R. Nash, A.J. Barnier (Eds.).
3. Dalrymple-Alford E.C., Budayr B. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1966, 23:1211-1214.
4. Eriksen C.W. The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition 1995, 2:101-118.
5. Karlin R.A. Hypnotizability and attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1979, 88:92-95.
6. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. Selection for cognition: Cognitive constraints on visual spatial attention. Visual Cognition 1999, 6:55-81.
7. Lu C., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:174-207.
8. Lupiáñez J., Klein R.M., Bartolomeo P. Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:1003-1014.
9. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 109:163-203.
10. MacLeod C.M. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:201-211.
11. MacLeod C.M., Sheehan P.W. Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: A historical footnote. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12:347-353.
12. Navon D., Gopher D. On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review 1979, 86:214-255.
13. Neely J.H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 264-336. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys (Eds.).
14. Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (in press). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, doi:. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004.
15. Raz A. Atypical attention: Hypnosis and conflict reduction. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 420-429. Guilford Press, New York. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
16. Raz A., Campbell N.K.J. Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:312-320.
17. Raz A., Fan J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102:9978-9983.
18. Raz A., Kirsch I., Pollard J., Nitkin-Kaner Y. Suggestion reduces the Stroop effect. Psychological Science 2006, 17:91-95.
19. Raz A., Landzberg K.S., Schweizer H.R., Zephrani Z.R., Shapiro T., Fan J., et al. Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia. Consciousness and Cognition 2003, 12:332-346.
20. Raz A., Moreno-Íñiguez M., Martin L., Zhu H. Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:331-338.
21. Raz A., Shapiro T., Fan J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry 2002, 59:1155-1161.
22. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 12:242-248.
23. Tipper S.P. Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54A:321-343.
24. van Veen V., Carter C.S. Conflict and cognitive control in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15:237-240.
25. Wendelken C., Shastri L. Connectionist mechanisms for cognitive control. Neurocomputing 2005, 65:663-672.