Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: A historical footnote

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 347-353

  MacLeod, Colin M ^a,b   Sheehan, Peter W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COGNITION; COLOR; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SLEEP WALKING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0041401756     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00025-4     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Blum G.S., Graef J.R. The detection over time of subjects simulating hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 19:1971;211-224.
2. Cattell J.M. The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind. 11:1886;63-65.
3. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review. 97:1990;332-361.
4. Dixon M., Laurence J.-R. Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: Automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop color-naming task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 101:1992;344-347.
5. Dixon M., Brunet A., Laurence J.-R. Hypnotizability and automaticity: Toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 99:1990;336-343.
6. Kahneman D., Chajczyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 9:1983;497-509.
7. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109:1991;163-203.
8. MacLeod C.M. Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition. 26:1998;201-211.
9. MacLeod C.M., Dunbar K. Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14:1988;126-135.
10. MacLeod C.M., MacDonald P.A. Inter-dimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;383-391.
11. Melara R.D., Algom D. Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review. 2003.
12. Nordby H., Hugdahl K., Jasiukaitis P., Spiegel D. Effects of hypnotisability on performance of a Stroop task and event related potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 88:1999;819-830.
13. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control. Solso R.L. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. 1975;55-85 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
14. Raz A., Landzberg K.S., Schweizer H.R., Zephrani Z., Shapiro T., Fan J., Posner M.I. Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under psychoplegia. Consciousness and Cognition. 2003.
15. Raz A., Shapiro T. Hypnosis and neuroscience: A cross talk between clinical and cognitive research. Archives of General Psychiatry. 59:2002;85-90.
16. Raz A., Shapiro T., Fan J., Posner M.I. Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry. 59:2002;1155-1161.
17. Sheehan P.W., Donovan P., MacLeod C.M. Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 97:1988;455-460.
18. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 12:1935;242-248.