Unsupervised multiparametric classification of dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging: Study of the healthy brain

NeuroImage

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 858-864

  Artzi, M ^a,b   Aizenstein, O ^a   Hendler, T ^a,b   Ben Bashat, D ^a  

^a TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Brain vascular territories; Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) imaging; Healthy brain; Multiparametric classification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN REGION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DURA MATER; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST IMAGING; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; TREND STUDY; VOLUNTEER; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BLOOD CIRCULATION TIME; BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PERFUSION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79955462799     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akbudak E., H.R., Li Y. AR* and A) Contrast Agent Perfusion Effects in Blood: Quantitation and Linearity Assessment. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Sydney, Australia 1998.
2. Alger J.R., Schaewe T.J., Lai T.C., Frew A.J., Vespa P.M., Etchepare M., Liebeskind D.S., Saver J.L., Kidwell S.C. Contrast agent dose effects in cerebral dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009, 29:52-64.
3. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. Neuroimage 2000, 11:805-821.
4. Bjornerud A., Emblem K.E. A fully automated method for quantitative cerebral hemodynamic analysis using DSC-MRI. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30:1066-1078.
5. Chou Y.C., Lu C.F., Guo W.Y., Wu Y.T. Blind source separation of hemodynamics from magnetic resonance perfusion brain images using independent factor analysis. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2010, 2010:360568.
6. Chou Y.C., Teng M.M., Guo W.Y., Hsieh J.C., Wu Y.T. Classification of hemodynamics from dynamic-susceptibility-contrast magnetic resonance (DSC-MR) brain images using noiseless independent factor analysis. Med. Image Anal. 2007, 11:242-253.
7. Covarrubias D.J., Rosen B.R., Lev M.H. Dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion imaging of brain tumors. Oncologist 2004, 9:528-537.
8. Harris G.J., Lewis R.F., Satlin A., English C.D., Scott T.M., Yurgelun-Todd D.A., Renshaw P.F. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging of regional cerebral blood volume in Alzheimer disease: a promising alternative to nuclear medicine. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1998, 19:1727-1732.
9. Helenius J., Perkio J., Soinne L., Ostergaard L., Carano R.A., Salonen O., Savolainen S., Kaste M., Aronen H.J., Tatlisumak T. Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. Acta Radiol. 2003, 44:538-546.
10. Herzog H., Seitz R.J., Tellmann L., Rota Kops E., Julicher F., Schlaug G., Kleinschmidt A., Muller-Gartner H.W. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow with 15O-butanol and positron emission tomography in humans. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16:645-649.
11. Huisman T.A., Sorensen A.G. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: techniques and application in children. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14:59-72.
12. Ibaraki M., Ito H., Shimosegawa E., Toyoshima H., Ishigame K., Takahashi K., Kanno I., Miura S. Cerebral vascular mean transit time in healthy humans: a comparative study with PET and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27:404-413.
13. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002, 17:825-841.
14. Jenkinson M., Smith S. Optimisation in Robust Linear Registration of Brain Images FMRIB Analysis Group Technical Reports 2000.
15. Jezzard P., Balaban R.S. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 34:65-73.
16. Kao Y.H., Guo W.Y., Wu Y.T., Liu K.C., Chai W.Y., Lin C.Y., Hwang Y.S., Jy-Kang Liou A., Wu H.M., Cheng H.C., Yeh T.C., Hsieh J.C., Mu Huo Teng M. Hemodynamic segmentation of MR brain perfusion images using independent component analysis, thresholding, and Bayesian estimation. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003, 49:885-894.
17. Knutsson L., Borjesson S., Larsson E.M., Risberg J., Gustafson L., Passant U., Stahlberg F., Wirestam R. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007, 26:913-920.
18. Koshimoto Y., Yamada H., Kimura H., Maeda M., Tsuchida C., Kawamura Y., Ishii Y. Quantitative analysis of cerebral microvascular hemodynamics with T2-weighted dynamic MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999, 9:462-467.
19. Kvinnsland Y., Brekke N., Taxt T.M., Gruner R. Multispectral analysis of multimodal images. Acta Oncol. 2009, 48:277-284.
20. Law M., Kazmi K., Wetzel S., Wang E., Iacob C., Zagzag D., Golfinos J.G., Johnson G. Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion and conventional MR imaging findings for adult patients with cerebral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004, 25:997-1005.
21. Law M., Yang S., Wang H., Babb J.S., Johnson G., Cha S., Knopp E.A., Zagzag D. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24:1989-1998.
22. Lee M.C., Cha S., Chang S.M., Nelson S.J. Partial-volume model for determining white matter and gray matter cerebral blood volume for analysis of gliomas. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 23:257-266.
23. Lupo J.M., Cha S., Chang S.M., Nelson S.J. Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26:1446-1454.
24. Matsuda H., Ohnishi T., Asada T., Li Z.J., Kanetaka H., Imabayashi E., Tanaka F., Nakano S. Correction for partial-volume effects on brain perfusion SPECT in healthy men. J. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44:1243-1252.
25. Moeller T.B. Pocket Atlas of Sectional Anatomy 2007, Second ed.
26. Montavont A., Nighoghossian N., Derex L., Hermier M., Honnorat J., Philippeau F., Belo M., Turjman F., Adeleine P., Froment J.C., Trouillas P. Intravenous r-TPA in vertebrobasilar acute infarcts. Neurology 2004, 62:1854-1856.
27. Moustafa R.R., Baron J.C. Imaging the penumbra in acute stroke. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2006, 8:281-289.
28. Ostergaard L. Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005, 22:710-717.
29. Ostergaard L., Sorensen A.G., Kwong K.K., Weisskoff R.M., Gyldensted C., Rosen B.R. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 36:726-736.
30. Ostergaard L., Weisskoff R.M., Chesler D.A., Gyldensted C., Rosen B.R. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 36:715-725.
31. Pantano P., Baron J.C., Lebrun-Grandie P., Duquesnoy N., Bousser M.G., Comar D. Regional cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in human aging. Stroke 1984, 15:635-641.
32. Petrella J.R., Provenzale J.M. MR perfusion imaging of the brain: techniques and applications. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 175:207-219.
33. Renshaw P.F., Levin J.M., Kaufman M.J., Ross M.H., Lewis R.F., Harris G.J. Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in neuropsychiatry: present utility and future promise. Eur. Radiol. 1997, 7(Suppl 5):216-221.
34. Rohl L., Ostergaard L., Simonsen C.Z., Vestergaard-Poulsen P., Andersen G., Sakoh M., Le Bihan D., Gyldensted C. Viability thresholds of ischemic penumbra of hyperacute stroke defined by perfusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient. Stroke 2001, 32:1140-1146.
35. Shin W., Horowitz S., Ragin A., Chen Y., Walker M., Carroll T.J. Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 58:1232-1241.
36. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17:143-155.
37. Speck O., Chang L., DeSilva N.M., Ernst T. Perfusion MRI of the human brain with dynamic susceptibility contrast: gradient-echo versus spin-echo techniques. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000, 12:381-387.
38. van der Zwan A., Hillen B., Tulleken C.A., Dujovny M. A quantitative investigation of the variability of the major cerebral arterial territories. Stroke 1993, 24:1951-1959.
39. Van Laere K.J., Dierckx R.A. Brain perfusion SPECT: age- and sex-related effects correlated with voxel-based morphometric findings in healthy adults. Radiology 2001, 221:810-817.
40. Weber M.A., Gunther M., Lichy M.P., Delorme S., Bongers A., Thilmann C., Essig M., Zuna I., Schad L.R., Debus J., Schlemmer H.P. Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. Invest. Radiol. 2003, 38:712-718.
41. Wong J.C., Provenzale J.M., Petrella J.R. Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 174:1147-1157.
42. Wu Y.T., Chou Y.C., Guo W.Y., Yeh T.C., Hsieh J.C. Classification of spatiotemporal hemodynamics from brain perfusion MR images using expectation-maximization estimation with finite mixture of multivariate gaussian distributions. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 57:181-191.
43. Zhang Y., Brady M., Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20:45-57.