Comparison of intravascular and extracellular contrast media for absolute quantification of myocardial rest-perfusion using high-resolution MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1047-1051

  Ritter, Christian O ^a,c   Wilke, Aline ^a   Wichmann, Tobias ^b   Beer, Meinrad ^a   Hahn, Dietbert ^a   Köstler, Herbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b RAPID BIOMEDICAL GMBH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

intravasal contrast medium; magnetic resonance tomography; myocardial perfusion; quantitative first pass perfusion

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOFOSVESET; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; CALIBRATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MYOCARDIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERFUSION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79955446435     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22557     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kaufmann PA, Camici PG,. Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 75-88. (Pubitemid 43086001)
2. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N,. MR first pass imaging: quantitative assessment of transmural perfusion and collateral flow. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13: 205-218.
3. Larsson HBW, Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Sondergaard L, Ring P, Henriksen O,. Myocardial perfusion modelling using MRI. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 716-726. (Pubitemid 26134567)
4. Jerosch-Herold M, Swingen C, Seethamraju RT,. Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Med Phys 2002; 29: 886-897. (Pubitemid 34525918)
5. Valleé J-P, Sostman HD, MacFall JR, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion by MRI after coronary occlusion. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 287-297. (Pubitemid 28361532)
6. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE,. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998; 25: 73-84. (Pubitemid 28063691)
7. Zierler KL,. Theoretical basis of indicator-dilution methods. Circ Res 1962; 10: 393-407.
8. Sourbron S, Dujardin M, Makkat S, Luypaert R,. Pixel-by-pixel deconvolution of bolus tracking data: optimization and implementation. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 429-447. (Pubitemid 46646462)
9. Makkat S, Luypaert R, Sourbron S, Stadnik T, DeMey J,. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in breast tumours with a deconvolution-based analysis of second-bolus T1-DCE data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1159-1167. (Pubitemid 46870273)
10. Pack NA, DiBella EV, Rust TC, et al. Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 52-67.
11. Köstler H, Sandstede J, Lipke C, et al. Auto-SENSE perfusion imaging of the whole human heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 702-708. (Pubitemid 37467271)
12. Ritter C, Brackertz A, Sandstede J, Beer M, Hahn D, Köstler H,. Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion at rest and under adenosine stress. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 844-849. (Pubitemid 44477667)
13. Köstler H, Ritter C, Lipp M, Beer M, Hahn D, Sandstede J,. Prebolus quantitative MR heart perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 296-299. (Pubitemid 39025273)
14. Hsu LJ, Rhoads KL, Holly JE, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 315-322. (Pubitemid 43364057)
15. Köstler H, Ritter C, Reiss-Zimmermann M, Beer M, Hahn D, Sandstede J,. Correction for partial volume errors in MR heart perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 848-852. (Pubitemid 38420464)
16. Köstler H, Ritter C, Trumpp, Beer M, Hahn D, Sandstede J,. Comparison of the Fermi function and the exponential function as model functions for deconvolution in quantitative heart perfusion imaging. MAGMA 2004; 16 (Suppl 1): 104.
17. Kroll K, Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, et al. Modelling regional myocardial flows from residue functions of an intravascular indicator. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: H1643-1655.
18. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100: 1992-2002. (Pubitemid 29529292)
19. Port M, Corot C, Rousseaux O, et al. P792: a rapid clearance blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results. MAGMA 2001; 12: 121-127. (Pubitemid 32510130)
20. Dewey M, Kaufels N, Laule M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability using a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 498-505. (Pubitemid 38982153)
21. Ritter CO, del Savio K, Brackertz A, Beer M, Hahn D, Köstler H,. Hochaufgelöste quantitative MR-tomographische Bestimmung der subendo- und subepimyokardialen Perfusion unter Stress und in Ruhe. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 945-952. (Pubitemid 47596419)
22. Gadofosveset: MS 325, MS 32520, Vasovist, ZK 236018. Drugs R D 2004; 5: 339-342.
23. De Haen C, La Ferla R, Maggioni F,. Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23 (Suppl 1): 161-688.
24. Köstler H, Ritter CO, Hahn D, Sandstede J,. Comparison of different contrast agents and doses for quantitative MR myocardial perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 382-389.
25. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210. (Pubitemid 34587412)
26. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, et al. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 677-684. (Pubitemid 39100248)
27. Jerosch-Herold M, Hu X, Murthy NS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial contrast enhancement with MS-325 and its relation to myocardial blood flow and the perfusion reserve. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 544-554 (Pubitemid 37339799)
28. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Wang Y, et al. Direct comparison of an intravascular and an extracellular contrast agent for quantification of myocardial perfusion. Int J Card Imaging 1999; 15: 453-464. (Pubitemid 30189171)
29. Lüdemann L, Nafz B, Elsner F, et al. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 125-134.
30. Kraitchman DL, Chin BB, Heldman AW, Solaiyappan M, Bluemke DA,. MRI detection of myocardial perfusion defects due to coronary artery stenosis with MS-325. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 149-158. (Pubitemid 34112904)
31. Gerber BL, Bluemke DA, Chin BB, et al. Single-vessel coronary artery stenosis: myocardial perfusion imaging with gadomer-17 first-pass MR imaging in a swine model of comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 2002; 225: 104-112.