High-resolution MRI for the quantitative evaluation of subendocardial and subepicardial perfusion under pharmacological stress and at rest;Hochaufgelöste quantitative MR-tomografische bestimmung der subendo- und subepimyokardialen perfusion unter stress und in ruhe

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 945-952

  Ritter, Christian Oliver ^a   Del Savio, K ^a   Brackertz, A ^a   Beer, M ^a   Hahn, D ^a   Kostler H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

High resolution MR imaging; Magnetic resonance tomography; Myocardial stress perfusion; Quantitative first pass perfusion

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPICARDIUM; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE; HEART PERFUSION; HEART STRESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REST; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VOLUNTEER; ALGORITHM; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART RATE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STRESS;

ADENOSINE; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY CIRCULATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REST; STRESS; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 35148882977     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963350     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Schwaiger M. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 693-698
2. Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography: comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. Circulation 1989; 79: 825-835
3. Muzik O, Duvernoy C, Beanlands RS et al. Assessment of diagnostic performance of quantitative flow measurements in normal subjects and patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease by means of nitrogen 13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 534-540
4. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium 82 PET and thallium SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nuc Med 1990; 31: 1899-1905
5. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2230-2235
6. Okazawa H, Takahashi M, Hata T et al. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blood flow and ejection fraction with a single dose of (NH3)-N-13 and gated PET. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 999-1005
7. Schwaiger M, Mehlin J. Cardiological applications of nuclear medicine. The Lancet 1999; 54: 6661-666
8. Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance: imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 864-870
9. Bache RJ, McHale PA, Greenfield JC Jr et al. Transmural myocardial perfusion during restricted coronary inflow in the awake dog. Am J Physiol 1977; 232: H645-651
10. Ootaki Y, Kamohara K, Schenk S et al. Transmural distribution of myocardial blood perfusion and phasic coronary blood flow pattern in a canine model of acute ischemia. Int J of Cardiology 2006; 107: 382-388
11. Klumpp B, Helber U, Fenchel M et al. Myocardial Perfusion MR-Imaging at 3 Tesla. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 122
12. Strach K, Meyer C, Naehle CP et al. High Resolution Myocardial Perfusion Imaging at 3 Tesla: Comparison to standard 1.5 Tesla perfusion studies and diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected CAD. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 122
13. Ligabue G, Romagnoli R, Torricelli P et al. 3 Tesla MR cardiac applications: 6 months experience of daily clinical practice with emphasis on comparison with 1.5 Tesla for myocardial viability evaluation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 586
14. Kondo M, Kawata K, Azuma A. Relationship between Coronary Blood flow velocity waveform and transmural distribution of myocardial blood flow in coronary artery. Jpn Heart 1999; 40: 783-790
15. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J et al. Contrast enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 485-497
16. Kraitchman DL, Wilke N, Hexeberg E et al. Myocardial perfusion and function in dogs with moderate coronary stenosis. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 771-780
17. Jerosch-Herold M, Hu X, Murthy NS et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Contrast Enhancement with MS-325 and Its Relation to Myocardial Blood Flow and the Perfusion Reserve. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 544-554
18. Epstein FH, London JF, Peters DC et al. Multislice first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI: validation in a model of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 482-491
19. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 2001; 104: 2412-2416
20. Cullen JH, Horsfield MA, Reek CR et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1386-1394
21. Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Søndergaard L et al. Capillary transfer constant of Gd-DTPA in the myocardium at rest and during vasodilation assessed by MRI. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 922-929
22. Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM et al. Analysis of Myocardial Perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 758-770
23. Muehling OM, Jerosch-Herold M, Panse P et al. Regional heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion in healthy human myocardium: Assessment with Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004; 6: 499-507
24. Muehling OM, Wilke NM, Panse P et al. Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve and transmural perfusion gradient in heart transplant arteriopathy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1054-1060
25. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1948-1953
26. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 1202-1210
27. Köstler H, Sandstede J, Lipke C et al. Auto-SENSE perfusion imaging of the whole human heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 18: 702-708
28. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH et al. Absolute Myocardial Perfusion in Canines Measured by Using Dual-Bolus First-Pass MR Imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 677-684
29. Köstler H, Ritter C, Lipp M et al. Prebolus Quantitative MR Heart Perfusion Imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 296-299
30. Hsu LJ, Rhoads KL, Holly JE et al. Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Analysis with a Dual-Bolus Contrast-Enhanced First-Pass MRI Technique in Humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 315-322
31. Ritter C, Brackertz A, Sandstede J et al. Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion at rest and under adenosine stress. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 844-849
32. Köstler H, Ritter C, Reiss-Zimmermann M et al. Correction for Partial Volume Errors in MR Heart Perfusion Imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 848-852
33. Köstler H, Ritter C, Trumpp M et al. Comparison of the Fermi function and the exponential function as model functions for deconvolution in quantitative heart perfusion imaging. MAGMA 2004; 16: p104
34. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys 1998; 25: 73-84
35. Zierler KL. Equations for Measuring Blood Flow by External Monitoring of Radioisotopes. Circ Res 1965; 16: 309-321
36. Jerosch-Herold M, Swingen C, Seethamraju RT. Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Med Phys 2002; 29: 886-897
37. Rimoldi O, Schäfers K, Boellaard R et al. Quantification of Subendocardial and Subepicardial Blood Flow Using 150-Labeled Water and PET: Experimental Validation. The J of Nuc Med 2006; 47: 163-172
38. Sandstede J, Ritter C, Köstler H. Vergleich von Gd-DTPA, Gd-BOPTA und Gadobutrol zur Bestimmung der myokardialen Perfusionsreserve in Präbolus-Technik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 190
39. Canet E, Douek P, Janier M et al. Influence of bolus volume and dose of Gadolinium chelate for first-pass myocardial perfusion MR imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 411-415
40. Fukuda S, Muro T, Hozumi T et al. Changes in transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans. Heart 2002; 88: 368-372
41. Wada H, Yasu T, Kotsuka H et al. Evaluation of Transmural Perfusion by Ultra Harmonic Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2005; 69: 1041-1046
42. Masugata H, Lafitte S, Peters B. Comparison real-time and intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography for quantification coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient. Circulation 2001; 104: 1550-1556
43. Masugata H, Cotter B, Peters B. Assessment of coronary stenosis severity and transmural perfusion gradient by myocardial contrast echocardiography: Comparison of gray-scale B-mode with power doppler imaging. Circulation 2000; 102: 1472-1433
44. Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A et al. Magnetic resonance first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 676-685