Control performance assessment subject to multi-objective user-specified performance characteristics

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 682-691

  Liu, Chunyu ^a   Huang, Biao ^b   Wang, Qinglin ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Linear matrix inequality (LMI); performance assessment; user specified benchmark

Indexed keywords

CLOSED-LOOP RESPONSE; CONE COMPLEMENTARITY LINEARIZATION; CONTROL LOOP PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; CONTROL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLER PERFORMANCE; MODEL APPROXIMATIONS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROBLEM; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PEAK AMPLITUDE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; POLE LOCATION; SIMULATION STUDIES; UPPER BOUND; USER-SPECIFIED BENCHMARK;

ALGORITHMS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RATING;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 79955407013     PISSN: 10636536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2051669     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. B. C. Kuo, Automatic Control Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1982.
2. B. Huang and S. L. Shah, "Practical issues in multivariable feedback control performance assessment," J. Process Control, vol. 8, pp. 421-430, 1998. (Pubitemid 128400781)
3. B. Huang and S. L. Shah, Performance Assessment of Control Loops: Theory and Applications. London, U.K.: Spinger-Verlag, 1999.
4. C. Scherer, P. Gahinet, and M. Chilali, "Multiobjective ouput-feedback control via LMI optimization," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 896-911, Jul. 1997. (Pubitemid 127826249)
5. E. C. Martínez and C. de Prada, "Performance assessment using ordinal time series analysis," Comput.-Aided Chem. Eng., vol. 24, pp. 261-266, 2007.
6. F. Olaleye, B. Huang, and E. Tamayo, "Performance assessment of control loops with time-variant disturbance dynamics," J. Process Control, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 867-877, 2004.
7. F. Xu and B. Huang, "Performance monitoring of SISO control loops subject to LTV disturbance dynamics: An improved LTI benchmark," J. Process Control, vol. 16, pp. 567-579, 2006.
8. F. Xu, K. H. Lee, and B. Huang, "Monitoring control performance via structured closed-loop response subject to output variance/covariance upper bound," J. Process Control, vol. 16, pp. 971-984, 2006. (Pubitemid 44331606)
9. K. J.Åström, Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1970.
10. K. Johansson, "The quadruple-tank process:Amultivariable laboratory process with an adjustable zero," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 456-465, May 2000.
11. ∞ model reduction of markovian jump linear systems," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 50, pp. 103-118, 2003.
12. 2 control problem," Automatica, vol. 29, pp. 373-385, 1993.
13. ∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 358-367, Mar. 1996. (Pubitemid 126767888)
14. M. Jelali, "An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications," Control Eng. Pract., vol. 14, pp. 441-466, 2006. (Pubitemid 43092173)
15. N. D. Pour, B. Huang, and S. L. Shah, "Consistency of noise covariance estimation in joint input-output closed-loop subspace identification with application in LQG benchmarking," J. Process Control, vol. 19, pp. 1649-1657, 2009.
16. N. F. Thornhill, M. Oettinger, and P. Fedenczuk, "Refinery-wide control loop performance assessment," J. Process Control, vol. 9, pp. 109-124, 1999.
17. S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, "Linear matrix inequalities in systems and control theory," presented at the Proc. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
18. T. J. Harris, "Assessment of closed loop performance," Canadian J. Chem. Eng., vol. 67, pp. 856-861, 1989.
19. 2 suboptimal control problems," Syst. Control Lett., vol. 36, pp. 295-305, 1999. (Pubitemid 129608999)
20. Y. Ebihara and T. Hagiwara, "On model reduction using LMI's," in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., 2004, vol. 1, pp. 774-777.