Monitoring control performance via structured closed-loop response subject to output variance/covariance upper bound

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 971-984

  Xu, Fangwei ^a   Lee, Kwan Ho ^a   Huang, Biao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Control monitoring; Convex optimization; Output variance covariance upper bound; Performance assessment; Structured closed loop response

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONDITION MONITORING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS CONTROL; TRAJECTORIES;

CONTROL MONITORING; CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; OUTPUT VARIANCE/COVARIANCE UPPER BOUND; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURED CLOSED-LOOP RESPONSE;

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33748310749     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2006.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Astrom K.J., and Wittenmark B. Computer-controlled Systems: Theory and Design. third ed. (1997), Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey
2. Bertsekas D.P. Nonlinear Programming (1995), Athena Scientific, Belmont, Mass
3. Collins E.G., and Skelton R.E. A theory of state covariance assignment for discrete systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 32 1 (1987) 35-41
4. M.C. de Oliveira, J.C. Geromel, Numerical comparison of output feedback design methods. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 1997. pp. 72-76.
5. Desborough L., and Harris T. Performance assessment measures for univarite feedback control. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 70 (1992) 1186-1197
6. ∞ model reduction using LMIs. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 49 7 (2004) 1187-1191
7. Frank M., and Wolfe P. An algorithm for quadratic programming. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 3 (1956) 95-110
8. ∞ control. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 4 (1994) 421-448
9. Ghaoui L.E., Oustry F., and AitRami M. A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 42 8 (1997) 1171-1176
10. Grigoriadis K.M., and Skelton R.E. Minimum-energy covariance controllers. Automatica 33 4 (1997) 569-578
11. Harris T.J. Assessment of control loop performance. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 67 (1989) 856-861
12. A. Horch, Condition monitoring of control loops. Ph.D. thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
13. Horch A., and Isaksson A.J. A modified index for control performance assessment. Journal of Process Control 9 6 (1999) 475-483
14. Hsieh C., and Skelton R.E. All covariance controllers for linear discrete-time systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 35 8 (1990) 908-915
15. Hsieh C., Skelton R.E., and Damra R.M. Minimum energy controllers with inequality constraints on output variances. Optimal Control Application & Methods 10 (1989) 347-366
16. Huang B. Performance assessment of processes with abrupt changes of disturbance. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 77 5 (1999) 1044-1054
17. Huang B., and Shah S.L. Practical issues in multivariable feedback control performance assessment. Journal of Process Control 8 5-6 (1998) 421-430
18. Huang B., and Shah S.L. Performance Assessment of Control Loops: Theory and Applications (1999), Spring-Verlag, London
19. X. Huang, Covariance analysis, control and fault detection. Ph.D. thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2003.
20. X. Huang, L. Zhang, B. Huang, Covariance constrained LQ control and applications. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, June 4-6, 2003. pp. 3992-3997.
21. D.J. Kozub, Controller performance monitoring and diagnosis: experiences and challenges, in: Jeffrey C. Kantor, Carlos E. Garcia, Brice Carnahan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Chemical Process Control, AIChE Symposium Series No. 316, vol. 93, Tahoe City, California, January 1996, pp. 83-96.
22. Li Q., Whiteley J.R., and Rhinehart R.R. A relative performance monitor for process controllers. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 17 (2003) 685-708
23. Mäkilä P.M., Westerlund T., and Toivonen H.T. Constrained linear quadratic gaussian control with process applications. Automatica 20 1 (1984) 15-29
24. Ogunnaike B.A., and Ray W.H. Process Dynamics, Modelling, and Control (1994), Oxford University Press, New York
25. F. Olaleye, Controller performance assessment of time variant processes. Master's thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2002.
26. Olaleye F., Huang B., and Tamayo E. Performance assessment of control loops with time-variant disturbance dynamics. Journal of Process Control 14 8 (2004) 867-877
27. Shunta J.P. Achieving World Class Manufacturing Through Process Control (1995), Prentice Hall, PTR, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
28. Skelton R.E., Iwasaki T., and Grigoriadis K.M. A Unified Algebraic Approach to Linear Control Design (1998), Taylor & Francis, London, UK
29. Tyler M.L., and Morari M. Performance monitoring of control systems using likelihood methods. Automatica 32 8 (1996) 1145-1162
30. Westerlund T. A digital quality control system for an industrial dry process rotary cement kiln. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26 4 (1981) 885-890
31. Xu F., and Huang B. Performance monitoring of SISO control loops subject to LTV disturbance dynamics: an improved LTI benchmark. Journal of Process Control 16 6 (2006) 567-579
32. ∞ model reduction for linear time-delay systems: continuous-time case. International Journal of Control 74 1 (2001) 1062-1074
33. ∞ model reduction of Markovian jump linear systems. Systems & Control Letters 50 (2003) 103-118
34. Zhu G., Rotea M.A., and Skelton R. A convergent algorithm for the output covariance constraint control problem. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 35 1 (1997) 341-361