Consistency of noise covariance estimation in joint input-output closed-loop subspace identification with application in LQG benchmarking

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1649-1657

  Danesh Pour, N ^a   Huang, B ^a   Shah, S L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Closed loop subspace identification; LQG benchmark; Performance assessment; System identification

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP IDENTIFICATION; CLOSED-LOOP; CONTROL LOOP PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; INPUT-OUTPUT; NOISE COVARIANCE; NOISE COVARIANCE MATRIX; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION STUDIES; SUBSPACE APPROACH; SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION; TRADE-OFF CURVES;

BENCHMARKING; CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS;

COVARIANCE MATRIX;

EID: 71849106130     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bauer D., Deistler M., and Scherrer W. Consistency and asymptotic normality of some subspace algorithms for systems without observed inputs. Automatica 35 7 (1999) 1243-1254
2. Bauer D., and Jansson M. Analysis of the asymptotic properties of the moesp type of subspace algorithms. Automatica 36 4 (2000) 497-509
3. D. Bauer, Some asymptotic theory for the estimation of linear systems using maximum likelihood methods or subspace algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, Tu Wein, 1998.
4. Bauer D. Asymptotic properties of subspace estimators. Automatica 41 3 (2005) 359-376
5. Bialkowski W.L. Dreams versus reality: a review from both sides of the gap. Pulp Pap. - Canada 94 (1993) 19-27
6. Boyd S.P., and Barratt C.H. Linear Control Design (1991), Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersy
7. A. Chiuso, G. Picci, Consistency analysis of closed-loop subspace identification, in: 43rd Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Atlantis, Bahamas, December 2004.
8. Chiuso A., and Picci G. Consistency analysis of some closed-loop subspace identification methods. Automatica 41 3 (2005) 377-391
9. Chiuso A., and Picci G. Asymptotic variance of closed-loop subspace identification methods. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 51 (2006) 1299-1314
10. N.L.C. Chui, Subspace methods and informative experiments for system identification, Ph.D. Thesis, Pembroke College, Cambridge, 1997.
11. Desborough L., and Harris T.J. Performance assessment measure for univariate feedback control. Cand. J. Chem. Eng. 70 (1992) 1186-1197
12. Ender D. Process control performance: not as good as you think. Control Eng. 9 (1993) 180-190
13. Harris T.J., Boudreau F., and MacGregor J.F. Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers. Automatica 32 11 (1996) 1505-1518
14. Harris T.J., Seppala C.T., and Desborough L.D. A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems. J. Process Control 9 (1999) 1-17
15. Harris T.J. Assessment of control loop performance. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 67 10 (1989) 856-861
16. Hoo K.A., Piovoso M.J., Schnelle P.D., and Rowan D.A. Process and controller performance monitoring: overview with industrial applications. Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Process. 17 (2003) 635-662
17. Huang B., Ding S.X., and Qin S.J. Closed-loop subspace identification: an orthogonal projection approach. J. Process Control 15 (2005) 53-66
18. Huang B., and Kadali R. Dynamic Modelling, Predictive Control and Performance Monitoring: A Data-driven Subspace Approach (2008), Springer Verlag, London
19. Huang B., Shah S.L., and Fujii H. The unitary interactor matrix and its estimation using closed-loop data. J. Process Control 7 3 (1997) 195-207
20. Huang B., Shah S.L., and Kwok E.K. Good, bad or optimal? performance assessment of multivariable processes. Automatica 33 6 (1997) 1175-1183
21. Huang B., and Shah S.L. Control Loop Performance Assessment: Theory and Applications (1999), Springer-Verlag, London
22. B. Huang, Multivariable statistical methods for control loop performance assessment, Ph.D. Thesis, Dep. of Chem. and Mate. Eng., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1997.
23. Jansson M., and Wahlberg B. On consistency of subspace methods for system identification. Automatica 34 12 (1998) 1507-1519
24. Kadali R., and Huang B. Controller performance assessment using lqg-benchmark obtained under closed loop. ISA Trans. 41 (2002) 521-537
25. Kadali R., and Huang B. Estimation of dynamic matrix and noise model for predictive control using closed-loop data. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41 (2002) 842-852
26. R. Kadali, B. Huang, Multivariate control performance assessment without interactor matrix, in: IFAC Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, 2003, pp. 61-66.
27. Katayama T., and Tanaka H. An approach to closed-loop subspace identification by orthogonal decomposition. Automatica 43 (2007) 1623-1630
28. Knudsen T. Consistency analysis of subspace identification methods based on linear regression approach. Automatica 47 (2001) 81-89
29. D.J. Kozub, Controller performance monitoring and diagnosis: experiences and challenges, in: J.C. Kantor, C.E. Garcia, B.C. Carnahan, (Eds.), Fifth International Conference on Chemical Process Control, AIChE and CACHE, Tahoe, CA, 1996, pp. 83-96.
30. Ko B.S., and Edgar T.F. Performance assessment of constrained model predictive control systems. AIChE J. 37 (2001) 1363-1371
31. Larimore W.E. System identification, reduced order filters and modeling via canonical variate analysis. In: Rao H.S., and Dorato P. (Eds). American Control Conference vol. 2 (1983), Piscataway, NJ 445-451
32. Larimore W.E. Statistical optimality and canonical variate analysis system identification. Signal Process. 52 (1996) 131-144
33. W. Lin, S.J. Qin, L. Ljung, On consistency of closed-loop subspace identification with innovation estimation, in: 43rd Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Atlantis, Bahamas, December 2004.
34. Ljung L., and McKelvey T. Subspace identification from closed loop data. Signal Process. 52 (1996) 209-215
35. L. Ljung, T. McKelvey, Interpretation of subspace methods: consistency analysis, in: 11th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, vol. 3, Fukuoka, Japan, July 1997, pp. 1125-1130.
36. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User (1999), Prentice-Hall
37. McNabb C.A., and Qin S.J. Projection based mimo control performance monitoring: I - covariance monitoring in state space. J. Process Control 13 (2003) 739-757
38. C.A. McNabb, MIMO control performance monitoring based on subspace projections, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
39. Moonen M., De Moor B., Vandenberghe L., and Vandewalle J. On- and off-line identification of linear state-space models. Int. J. Control 49 1 (1989) 219-232
40. Peternell K., Deistler M., and Scherrer W. Consistency and relative efficiency of subspace methods. Automatica 31 12 (1993) 1865-1875
41. Peternell K., Scherrer W., and Deistler M. Statistical analysis of novel subspace identification methods. Signal Process. 52 (1996) 161-177
42. S.J. Qin, L. Ljung, Closed-loop subspace identification with innovation estimation, in: 13th IFAC SYSID Symposium, Rotterdam, Netherlands, August 2003.
43. S.J. Qin, L. Ljung, Parallel qr-implementation of subspace identification with parsimonious models, in: 13th IFAC SYSID Symposium, Rotterdam, Netherlands, August 2003.
44. Qin S.J., and Yu J. Recent developments in multivariable controller performance monitoring. J. Process Control 17 (2007) 221-227
45. Qin S.J. Control performance monitoring a review and assessment. Comput. Chem. Eng. 23 (1998) 178-186
46. Schäfer J., and Cinar A. Multivariable mpc system performance assessment, monitoring, and diagnosis. J. Process Control 14 (2004) 113-129
47. Söderström T., and Stoica P. System Identification (1989), Prentice Hall International
48. A.K. Tangirala, S. Lakshminarayanan, S.L. Shah, Closed-loop identification using canonical variate analysis, in: 47th CSChE Conference, Edmonton, Canada, 1997.
49. Thornhill N.F., Oettinger M., and Surgenor B. Refinery-wide control loop performance assessment. J. Process Control 9 (1999) 109-124
50. van Overschee P., and deMoor B. Subspace Identification for Linear Systems; Theory, Implementation, Application (1996), Katholieke Universiteit
51. van Overschee P., and De Moor B. N4sid: subspace algorithm for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica 30 1 (1994) 75-93
52. van Overschee P., and De Moor B. A unifying theorem for three subspace system identification algorithms. Automatica 31 12 (1995) 1877-1883
53. P. van Overschee, B. De Moor, Closed-loop subspace system identification, Technical Report ESAT-SISTA/TR 1996-52I, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, 1996.
54. P. van Overschee, B. De Moor, Closed-loop subspace system identification, in: 36th Conference on Decision and Control, 1997, pp. 1834-1853.
55. Verhaegen M., and Dewilde P. Subspace model identification part 1. the output-error state-space model identification class of algorithms. Int. J. Control 56 5 (1992) 1187-1210
56. Verhaegen M. Application of a subspace model identification techniques to identify lti systems operating on closed-loop. Automatica 29 (1993) 1027-1040
57. Wang J., and Qin S.J. Closed-loop subspace identification using the parity space. Automatica 42 (2006) 315-320
58. Yu J., and Qin S.J. Statistical mimo controller performance monitoring. part i: Data-driven covariance benchmark. J. Process Control 18 3 (2008) 277-296