Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 561-566

  Tuinenburg, Joan C ^a   Koning, Gerhard ^a   Seppenwoolde, Yvette ^a   Reiber, Johan H C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contour detection; Flat panel detector; Image intensifier; Quantitative analysis; X ray angiography

Indexed keywords

MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CAMERA; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMAGING SYSTEM; PHANTOM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VESSELS; DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33749617042     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20797     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. van der Zwet PMJ, Meyer DJ, Reiber JHC. Automated and accurate assessment of the distribution, magnitude, and direction of pincushion distortion in angiographic images. Invest Radiol 1995;30: 204-213.
2. Holmes DR Jr, Laskey WK, Wondrow MA, Cusma JT. Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Revolution or evolution-What are the issues? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63: 324-330.
3. Spahn M, Heer V, Freytag R. Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems. Radiologe 2003;43:340-350.
4. Geijer H. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimalization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat panel digital detector. Acta Radiol Suppl 2002;43:1-43.
5. Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Dafnomilli P, Koutelou M, Vano E, et al. Comparison of a conventional and flat-panel digital system in interventional cadiology procedures. Br J Radiol 2004;77:562-577.
6. Reiber JHC, von Land CD, Koning G, van der Zwet PMJ, van Houdt RCM, Schalij MJ, et al. Comparison of accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary arterial analyses between cinefilm and digital systems. In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, editors. Progress in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1994. pp 67-85.
7. Gronenschild E, Janssen J, Tijdens F. CAAS II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1994;33:61-75.
8. Haase J, Escaned J, van Swijndregt EM, Ozaki Y, Gronenschild E, Slager CJ, et al. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1993;30:104-114.
9. van der Zwet PMJ, Reiber JHC. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: The gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:216-224.
10. van Herck PL, Gavit L, Gorissen P, Wuyts FL, Claeys MJ, Bosmans JM, et al. Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat-panel system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;63:192-200.
11. Reiber JHC, Koning G, von Land CD, van der Zwet PMJ. Why and how should QCA systems be validated? In: Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, editors. Progress in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1994. pp 33-48.