The timing of binding and segregation of two compound aftereffects

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1047-1057

  McGovern, David P ^a   Hancock, Sarah ^a   Peirce, Jonathan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Binding; Contours; Plaids; Segregation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTOUR ADAPTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION; CURVATURE AFTEREFFECT; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PLAID ADAPTATION; PLAID SELECTIVE CONTRAST ADAPTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 79955157617     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adelson E.H., Farid H. Filtering reveals form in temporally structured displays. Science 1999, 286:2231.
2. Alais D., Blake R., Lee S.-H. Visual features that vary together over time group together over space. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:160-164.
3. Altmann L., Eckhorn R., Singer W. Temporal integration in the visual system: Influence of temporal dispersion on figure-ground discrimination. Vision Research 1986, 26:1949-1957.
4. Beaudot W.H.A., Mullen K.T. Processing time of contour integration: The role of colour, contrast, and curvature. Perception 2001, 30:833-853.
5. Dakin S.C., Bex P.J. Role of synchrony in contour binding: Some transient doubts sustained. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. Optics and Image Science 2002, 19:678-686.
6. Elliott M.A., Shi Z., Kelly S.D. A moment to reflect upon perceptual synchrony. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1663-1665.
7. Elliott M.A., Shi Z., Surer F. The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity. Psychological Research 2007, 71:687-693.
8. Fahle M. Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proceedings of the Royal Society London: B 1993, 254:199-203.
9. Fahle M., Koch C. Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding. Vision Research 1995, 35:491-494.
10. Forte J., Hogben J.H., Ross J. Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation. Vision Research 1999, 39:4052-4061.
11. Gray C.M., Singer W. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1989, 86:1698-1702.
12. Greenlee M.W., Georgeson M.A., Magnussen S., Harris J.P. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Research 1991, 31:223-236.
13. Hancock S., McGovern D.P., Peirce J.W. Ameliorating the combinatorial explosion with spatial frequency matched combinations of V1 outputs. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(8):7. http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/8/7. 10.1167/10.8.7.
14. Hancock S., Peirce J.W. Selective mechanisms for simple contours revealed by compound adaptation. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(7:11):1-10. http://journalofvision.org/8/7/11. 10.1167/8.7.11.
15. Hancock P.J.B., Walton L., Mitchell G., Plenderleith Y., Phillips W.A. Segregation by onset asynchrony. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(7:21):1-21. http://journalofvision.org/8/7/21/. 10.1167/8.7.21.
16. Hess R.F., Beaudot W.H.A., Mullen K.T. Dynamics of contour integration. Vision Research 2001, 41:1023-1037.
17. Holcombe A.O. A purely temporal transparency mechanism in the visual system. Perception 2001, 30:1311-1320.
18. Holcombe A.O. Seeing slow and seeing fast: Two limits on perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(5):216-221.
19. Holcombe A.O., Cavanagh P. Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(2):127-128.
20. Kandil F.I., Fahle M. Purely temporal figure-ground segregation. European Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 13:2004-2008.
21. Kanizsa G. Organisation in vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception 1979, Praeger, New York.
22. Kiper D.C., Gegnfurtner K.R., Movshon J.A. Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation. Vision Research 1996, 36:539-544.
23. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology 1935, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
24. Kojima H. Figure/ground segregation from temporal delay is best at high spatial frequencies. Vision Research 1998, 38:3729-3734.
25. Ledgeway T., Smith A.T. Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in Human vision. Vision Research 1994, 34:2727-2740. [PubMed].
26. Lee S.-H., Blake R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science 1999, 284:1165-1168.
27. Lee S.-H., Blake R. Reply to Adelson and Farid. Science 1999, 286:2231.
28. Leonards U., Singer W. Two segmentation mechanisms with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrast. Vision Research 1998, 38:101-109.
29. Leonards U., Singer W., Fahle M. The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation. Vision Research 1996, 36:2689-2697.
30. Magnussen S., Johnsen T. Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research 1986, 26:661-672.
31. May K.A., Hess R.F. Dynamics of snakes and ladders. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(12:13):1-9. http://journalofvision.org/7/12/13/. 10.1167/7.12.13.
32. McGovern D., Peirce J.W. The spatial characteristics of plaid-form-selective mechanisms. Vision Research 2010, 50:796-804.
33. Morrone M.C., Burr D.C., Maffei L. Functional implications of cross orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. 1. Neurophysiological evidence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 1982, 216:335-354.
34. Parton A., Donner T.H., Donnelly N., Usher M. Perceptual grouping based on temporal structure: Impact of subliminal flicker and visual transients. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:481-502.
35. Peirce J.W. The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(6:13):1-10. http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/6/13. 10.1167/7.6.13.
36. Peirce J.W. PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2007, 162:8-13. [PubMed][Article].
37. Peirce J.W., Taylor L.J. Selective mechanisms for complex visual patterns revealed by adaptation. Neuroscience 2006, 141:15-18. [PubMed][Article].
38. Rogers-Ramachandran D.C., Ramachandran V.S. Phantom contours - A new class of visual-patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1991, 29:391-394.
39. Rogers-Ramachandran D.C., Ramachandran V.S. Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision. Vision Research 1998, 38:71-77.
40. Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J. Generalized common fate: Grouping by common luminance changes. Psychological Science 2001, 12:437-444.
41. Shadlen M.N., Movshon J.A. Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 1999, 24:67-77.
42. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations?. Neuron 1999, 24:49-65.
43. Singer W., Gray C.M. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:555-586.
44. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Overlapping features can be parsed on the basis of rapid temporal cues than produce stable emergent percepts. Vision Research 2002, 42:2669-2692.
45. Usher M., Donnelly N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature 1998, 394:179-182.
46. VanRullen R., Koch C. Is perception discrete or continuous?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:207-213.