Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 24, 1999, Pages 4052-4061

  Forte, Jason ^a   Hogben, John H ^a   Ross, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contour; Flicker; Segregation; Short range; Temporal segmentation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032861630     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00124-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics & Image Science. 2:1985;284-299.
2. DeAngelis G.C., Ohzawa I., Freeman R.D. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 69:1993;1118-1135.
3. DeAngelis G.C., Ohzawa I., Freeman R.D. Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends in Neurosciences. 18:1995;451-458.
4. Dow B.M., Snyder A.Z., Vautin R.G., Bauer R. Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research. 44:1981;213-228.
5. Fahle M., Koch C. Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding. Vision Research. 35:1995;491-494.
6. Fahle M. Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences. 254:1993;199-203.
7. King-Smith P.E., Grigsby S.S., Vingrys A.J., Benes S.C., Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Research. 34:1994;885-912.
8. Kiper D.C., Gegenfurtner K.R., Movshon J.A. Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation. Vision Research. 36:1996;539-544.
9. Leonards U., Singer W. Two segmentation mechanisms with differential sensitivity for colour and luminance contrast. Vision Research. 38:1998;101-109.
10. Leonards U., Singer W., Fahle M. The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation. Vision Research. 36:1996;2689-2697.
11. Merigan W.H., Maunsell J.H. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience. 16:1993;369-402.
12. Ohzawa I., DeAngelis G.C., Freeman R.D. Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 75:1996;1779-1805.
13. Ramachandran V.S. Perception: a biological perspective. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S. Neural networks for vision and image processing. 1992;46-91 MIT, Cambridge, MA.
14. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D.C. Phantom contours: a new class of visual patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 29:1991;391-394.
15. Reppas J.B., Niyogi S., Dale A.M., Sereno M.I., Tootell R.B.H. Representation of motion boundaries in retinotopic human visual cortical areas. Nature. 388:1997;175-179.
16. Rogers-Ramachandran D.C., Ramachandran V.S. Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision. Vision Research. 38:1998;71-77.
17. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychophysical method. Perception & Psychophysics. 47:1990;87-91.
18. Weibull W.A. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 18:1951;292-297.