Figure/ground segregation from temporal delay is best at high spatial frequencies

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 23, 1998, Pages 3729-3734

  Kojima, Haruyuki ^a  

^a RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding; Figure ground; Segregation; Spatial frequency; Temporal difference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031659376     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00012-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Julesz B. A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends Neurosci 1984;7:41-5.
2. Ramachandran VS, Anstis S. Figure-ground segregation modulates apparent motion. Vis Res 1986;26:1969-75.
3. Nakayama K, Shimojo S, Silverman GH. Stereoscopic depth: its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 1989;18:55-68.
4. Nothdurft HC. Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vis Res 1991;31:1073-8.
5. Fahle M. Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proc R Soci Lond B 1993;254:199-203.
6. Lennie P. Parallel visual pathways: a review. Vis Res 1980;20:561-94.
7. DeYoe EA, Van Essen DC. Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends Neurosci 1988;11:219-26.
8. Merigan WH, Maunsell HR. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Ann Rev Neurosci 1993;16:369-402.
9. Schiller PH, Logothetis NK. The colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system. Trends Neurosci 1990;13:392-8.
10. Schiller PH, Logothetis NK, Charles ER. Functions of the colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the visual system. Nature 1990;343:68-70.
11. Merigan WH, Byrne CE, Maunsell HR. Does primate motion perception depend on the magnocellular pathway? J Neurosci 1991;11:3422-9.
12. Robson JG. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity functions of the visual system. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56:1141-2.
13. Tolhurst DJ. Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus. J Physiol 1973;231:385-402.
14. Tolhurst DJ. Transient and sustained channels in human vision. Vis Res 1975;15:1151-5.
15. Breitmeyer BG. Visual masking: an integrative approach. Oxford, New York, 1984:162-232.
16. Watson AB. Temporal sensitivity. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, editors. Handbook of perception and human performance. In: Sensory processes and perception, vol. I. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986:6-1-6-43.
17. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J Neurosci -68.
18. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56:1628-33.
19. Sagi D, Hochstein S. Lateral inhibition between spatially adjacent spatial-frequency channels? Percept Psychophys 1985;37:315-22.
20. Westheimer G, McKee SP. Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vis Res 1977;17:89-93.
21. Gray CM, König P, Engel AK, Singer W. Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 1989;338:334-7.
22. Engel AE, König P, Kreiter AK, Singer W. Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science 1991;252:1177-9.
23. Singer W, Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Ann Rev Neurosci 1995;18:555-86.
24. Kiper DC, Gegenfurtner KR, Movshon AJ. Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation. Vis Res 1996;36:539-44.
25. Fahle M, Koch C. Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding. Vis Res 1995;35:491-4.
26. Leonards U, Singer W, Fahle M. The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation. Vis Res 1996;36:2689-97.