The application of 3D representations in face recognition

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 969-977

  Schwaninger, Adrian ^a,b   Yang, Jisien ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

3D face representation; Face recognition; Silhouette

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RECOGNITION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955147479     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alley T.R., Schultheis J.A. Is facial skin tone sufficient to produce a cross-racial identification effect?. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2001, 92:1191-1198.
2. Barden J., Maddux W.W., Petty R.E., Brewer M.B. Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 2004, 87:5-22.
3. Beymer, D., & Poggio, T. (1995). Face recognition from one example view. In Fifth international conference on computer vision (ICCV'95) (pp. 500-507).
4. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94:115-147.
5. Biederman I. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory. Spatial Vision 2000, 13(2, 3):241-253.
6. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects - Evidence and conditions for 3dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:1162-1182.
7. Biederman I., Kalocsai P. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1997, 352(1358):1203-1219.
8. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 187-194).
9. Bruce V. Recognising faces 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, London.
10. Bruce V., Hanna E., Dench N., Healey P., Burton M. The importance of 'Mass' in line drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1992, 6:619-628.
11. Bruce V., Healey P., Burton M., Doyle T., Coombes A., Linney A. Recognition facial surfaces. Perception 1991, 20:755-769.
12. Bruce V., Langton S. The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognizing the sex and identities of faces. Perception 1994, 23:803-822.
13. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a 2-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992, 89:60-64.
14. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S.Y., Tarr M.J. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:247-260.
15. Casey, S. J., & Newell, F. (2003). Haptic own-face recognition. Poster presented at EuroHaptics 2003, Zurich.
16. Chen C.C., Kao K.L.C., Tyler C.W. Face configuration processing in the human brain: The role of symmetry. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 17:1423-1432.
17. Davidenko N. Silhouetted face profiles: A new methodology for face perception research. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(4):1-17.
18. Davies G.M., Ellis H.D., Shepherd J.W. Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63:180-187.
19. Desimone R. Face-selective cells in the temporal vortex of monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:1-7.
20. Ellis H.D., Florence M. Bodamer's (1947) paper on prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990, 7:81-105.
21. Farah M.J. Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:1-19.
22. Farah M.J., Levinson K.L., Klein K.L. Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:661-674.
23. Goldstein A.G., Chance J. Do 'foreign' faces really look alike?. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1979, 13(2):111-113.
24. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Avidan G., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
25. Hayward W.G., Rhodes G., Schwaninger A. An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition 2008, 106:1017-1027.
26. Hecaen H., Angelergues R. Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Archives of Neurology 1962, 7:92-100.
27. Hill H., Schyns P.G., Akamatsu S. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 1997, 62:201-222.
28. Johnson A., Hill H., Carman N. Recognising faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 1992, 21:365-375.
29. Kanwisher N., Downing P., Epstein R., Kourtzi Z. Functional imagining of visual recognition. Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition 2001, 109-152. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Cabeza, A. Kingstone (Eds.).
30. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:4302-4311.
31. Kemp R., Pike G., White P., Musselman A. Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception 1996, 25:37-52.
32. Kilgour A.R., Lederman S.J. Face recognition by hand. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:339-352.
33. Lades M., Vorbrüggen J.C., Buhmann J., Lange J., von der Malsburg C., Würtz R.P., et al. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1993, 42(3):300-311.
34. Leder H. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception 1996, 25:355-366.
35. Liu C.H., Collin C.A., Burton A.K., Chaudhuri A. Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative. Vision Research 1999, 39(24):4003-4009.
36. Marr D. Vision 1982, W.H. Freeman, San Franciso.
37. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B 1978, 200:269-294.
38. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:3-35.
39. ÓToole, A. J., Bülthoff, H. H., Troje, N. F., &Vetter, T. (1995). Face recognition across large view point changes. In M. Bichsel (Ed.), Proceedings of the intern workshop on automatic face- and gesture recognition (pp. 326-331). Zürich: MultiMedia Lab. Computer Science Dept. Univ.
40. Ojemann J.G., Ojemann G.A., Lettich E. Neuronal activity related to faces and matching human right nondominant temporal cortex. Brain 1992, 115:1-13.
41. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., Harries M.H., Bevan R., Hietanen J.K., Benson P.J., et al. Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 86:159-173.
42. Poggio, T. (1990). 3D object recognition: On a result by Basri and Ullman. Technical report 9005-03, IRST, Povo, Italy.
43. Poggio, T. (1991). 3D object recognition and prototypes: One 2D view may be sufficient. Technical Report 9107-02, IRST, Povo, Italy.
44. Poggio, T., & Vetter, T. (1992). Recognition and structure from one 2D model view: Observations on prototypes, object classes and symmetries. A. I. Memo No. 1347, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusettes Institute of Technology.
45. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize 3dimensional objects. Nature 1990, 343(6255):263-266.
46. Rhodes G., Brennan S.E., Carey S. Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:473-497.
47. Russell R., Biederman I., Nederhouser M., Sinha P. The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces. Vision Research 2007, 47:157-165.
48. Schwaninger A., Lobmaier J., Wallraven C., Collishaw S. Two routes to face perception: Evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1413-1440.
49. Schwaninger, A., Schumacher, S., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Using 3D computer graphics for perception: The role of local and global information in face processing. In Proceedings of the 4th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization (pp. 19-26). New York, USA: ACM Press.
50. Schwaninger A., Ryf S., Hofer F. Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces. Vision Research 2003, 43:1501-1505.
51. Schwaninger A., Wallraven C., Bülthoff H.H. Computational modeling of face recognition based on psychophysical experiments. European Journal of Psychology 2004, 63:207-215.
52. Schwaninger A., Wallraven C., Cunningham D.W., Chiller-Glaus S. Processing of identity and emotion in faces: A psychophysical, physiological and computational perspective. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 156:321-343.
53. Schyns, P. G., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1993). Conditions for viewpoint dependent face recognition. A.I. Memo No. 1432, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
54. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:367-372.
55. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 46A(2):225-245.
56. Tanaka J.W., Kiefer M., Bukach C.M. A holistic account of the own-face effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 2004, 93:B1-B9.
57. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by Geon structural descriptions or by multiple views - Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:1494-1505.
58. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape-recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1989, 21:233-282.
59. Tong F., Nakayama K. Robust representations for faces evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1016-1035.
60. Troje N.F., Kersten D. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception 1999, 28:483-487.
61. Ullman S., Basri R. Recognition by linear-combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1991, 13:992-1006.
62. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1988, 79:471-491.
63. Vetter T. Synthesis of novel views from a single face image. International Journal of Computer Vision 1998, 28:103-116.
64. Wallraven C., Schwaninger A., Bülthoff H.H. Learning from humans: Computational modeling of face recognition. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2005, 16:401-418.
65. Wallraven C., Schwaninger A., Schuhmacher S., Bülthoff H.H. View-based recognition of faces in man and machine: Re-visiting inter-extra-ortho. Lectures Notes in Computer Science 2002, 2525:651-660.
66. Wiskott L., Fellous J.M., Krüger N., von der Malsburg C. Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1997, 19:775-779.
67. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.
68. Yin R.K. Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability?. Neuropsychologia 1970, 8:395-402.
69. Yip A.W., Sinha P. Contribution of color to face recognition. Perception 2002, 32:995-1003.