Using 3D computer graphics for perception: The role of local and global information in face processing

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 253, Issue , 2007, Pages 19-26

  Schwaninger, Adrian ^a,b   Schumacher, Sandra ^b   Bülthoff, Heinrich ^a   Wallraven, Christian ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Psychophysics; Viewpoint generalization

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FACE RECOGNITION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SET THEORY; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

FACE PROCESSINGS; FEATURAL INFORMATIONS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VIEWPOINT GENERALIZATIONS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 36849016018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1272582.1272586     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. BLANZ, V., AND VETTER, T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In Siggraph99, 187-194.
2. BRUCE, V., BURTON, A. M., AND CRAW, I. 1999. Modeling face recognition. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, vol. 335(1273), 121-128.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., AND EDELMANN, S. 1992. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89(1), 60-64.
4. CABEZA, R., AND KATO, T. 2000. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. In Psychol Sci, vol. 11(5), 429-433.
5. COLLISHAW, S. M., AND HOLE, G. J. 2000. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. In Perception, vol. 29(8), 893-909.
6. DIAMOND, R., AND CAREY, S. 1986. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 115, 107-117.
7. GREEN, D. M., AND SWETS, J. A. 1966. In Signal detection theory andpsychophysics, New York: Wiley, 187-194.
8. HAYWARD, W. G., RHODES, G., AND SCHWANINGER, A. in press. An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. In Cognition.
9. HILL, H., SCHYNS, P. G., AND AKAMATSU, S. 1997. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. In Cognition, vol. 62(2), 201-222.
10. LEDER, H., CANDRIAN, G., HUBER, O., AND BRUCE, V. 2001. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. In Perception, vol. 30, 73-83.
11. LOWE, D. G. 1987. 3-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. In Artificial Intelligence, vol. 31(3), 355-395.
12. MOSES, Y., ULLMAN, S., AND EDELMAN, S. 1996. Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces. In Perception, vol. 25(4), 443-461.
13. O'TOOLE, A. J., EDELMAN, S., AND BÜLTHOFF. 1998. Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. In Vision Research, vol. 38(15-16), 2351-2363.
14. PALMER, S., ROSCH, E., AND CHASE, P. 1981. Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In Attention and Performances IX, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, J. L. . A. Baddeley, Ed.
15. RAKOVER, S.S., AND TEUCHER, B. 1997. Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship. In Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 59(5), 752-761.
16. RAKOVER, S.S. 2002. Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. In British Journal of Psychology, vol. 93, 1-30.
17. RHODES, G., BRAKE, S., AND ARKINSON, A. P. 1993. Whats lost in inverted faces. In Cognition, vol. 47(1), 25-57.
18. SCHANINGER, A., WALLRAVEN, C., CUNNINGHAM, D. W., AND CHILLER-GLAUS, S. 2006. Processing of identity and emotion in faces: A psychophysical, physiological and computational perspective. In Progress in Brain Research, vol. 156, 321-343.
19. SCHWANINGER, A., AND MAST, F. 1999. Why is face recognition so orientation-sensitive? psychophysical evidence for an integrative model. In Perception (S'uppl.), vol. 28, 116.
20. SCHWANINGER, A., LOBMAIER, J., AND S M. COLLISHAW. 2002. Role of featural and configural information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition. In Lectures Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2525, 643-650.
21. SCHWANINGER, A., CARBON, C. C., AND LEDER, H. 2003. Expert face processing: Specialization and constraints. In Development of face processing, Göttingen: Hogrefe, G. Schwarzer and H. Leder, Eds., 81-97.
22. SCHWANINGER, A., SCHUMACHER, S., WALLRAVEN, C., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. submitted. View-based recognition of faces: Generalization across viewpoint is orientation-sensitive. In Vision Research.
23. SCHYNS, P. G., BONNAR, L., AND GOSSELIN, F. 2002. Show me the features! understanding recognition from the use of visual information. In Psychological Science, vol. 13(5), 402-409.
24. SERGENT, J. 1984. An investigation into component and configurational processes underlying face recognition. In British Journal of Psychology, vol. 75, 221-242.
25. SINHA, P., BALAS, B. J., OSTROVSKY, Y., AND RUSSELL, R. 2006. Face recognition by humans: 19 results all computer vision researchers should know about. In Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, 1948-1962.
26. TANAKA, J. W., AND FARAH, M. J. 1993. Parts and wholes in face recognition. In Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, vol. 46(2), 225-245.
27. TANAKA, J. W., AND SENGCO, J. A. 1997. Features and their configuration in face recognition. In Memory & Cognition, vol. 25(5), 583-592.
28. TARR, M., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 1998. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. In Cognition, vol. 67, 1-20.
29. TROJE, N. F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 1996. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. In Vision Research, vol. 36(12), 1761-1771.
30. TROJE, N. F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 1998. How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views? In Vision Research, vol. 38(1), 79-89.
31. ULLMAN, S., AND BASRI, R. 1991. Recognition by linear-combinations of models. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis andMachine Intelligence, vol. 13(10), 992-1006.
32. VETTER, T., POGGIO, T., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 1994. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in 3-dimensional object recognition. In Current Biology, vol. 4(1), 18-23.
33. WALLRAVEN, C., SCHWANINGER, A., SCHUMACHER, S., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2002. View-based recognition of faces in man and machine: Re-visiting inter-extra-ortho. In Lectures Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2525, 651-660.
34. YOUNG, A. W., HELLAWELL, D., AND HAY, D. C. 1987. Configurational information in face perception. In Perception, vol. 16(6), 747-759.