Neuronal signal dynamics during preparation and execution for behavioral shifting in macaque posterior parietal cortex

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2503-2520

  Kamigaki, Tsukasa ^a   Fukushima, Tetsuya ^a   Miyashita, Yasushi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COGNITION; DYNAMICS; MACACA; MALE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MALE; NEURONS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955142361     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21613     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 189-220.
3. Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230, 456-458.
4. Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D. (1991). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 909-922.
5. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2006). Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 103, 7186-7191.
6. Boussaoud, D., & Bremmer, F. (1999). Gaze effects in the cerebral cortex: Reference frames for space coding and action. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 170-180.
7. Bremmer, F., Distler, C., & Hoffmann, K. P. (1997). Eye position effects in monkey cortex. II. Pursuit- and fixation-related activity in posterior parietal areas LIP and 7A. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 962-977.
8. Calton, J. L., Dickinson, A. R., & Snyder, L. H. (2002). Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 580-588.
9. Chiu, Y. C., & Yantis, S. (2009). A domain-independent source of cognitive control for task sets: Shifting spatial attention and switching categorization rules. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3930-3938.
10. Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319-349.
11. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
12. Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996). Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature, 380, 69-72.
13. Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1997). Dissociable forms of inhibitory control within prefrontal cortex with an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: Restriction to novel situations and independence from "on-line" processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 9285-9297.
14. Everling, S., & DeSouza, J. F. (2005). Rule-dependent activity for prosaccades and antisaccades in the primate prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1483-1496.
15. Fox, M. T., Barense, M. D., & Baxter, M. G. (2003). Perceptual attentional set-shifting is impaired in rats with neurotoxic lesions of posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 676-681.
16. Genovesio, A., Brasted, P. J., Mitz, A. R., & Wise, S. P. (2005). Prefrontal cortex activity related to abstract response strategies. Neuron, 47, 307-320.
17. Goldberg, M. E., Bisley, J. W., Powell, K. D., & Gottlieb, J. (2006). Saccades, salience and attention: The role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 157-175.
18. Gruber, O., Karch, S., Schlueter, E. K., Falkai, P., & Goschke, T. (2006). Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching. Neuroimage, 31, 887-895.
19. Isoda, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2007). Switching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 240-248.
20. Janssen, P., Srivastava, S., Ombelet, S., & Orban, G. A. (2008). Coding of shape and position in macaque lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6679-6690.
21. Johnston, K., & Everling, S. (2006). Monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex sends task-selective signals directly to the superior colliculus. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 12471-12478.
22. Johnston, K., Levin, H. M., Koval, M. J., & Everling, S. (2007). Top-down control-signal dynamics in anterior cingulated and prefrontal cortex neurons following task switching. Neuron, 53, 453-462.
23. Kamigaki, T., Fukushima, T., & Miyashita, Y. (2009). Cognitive set reconfiguration signaled by macaque posterior parietal neurons. Neuron, 61, 941-951.
24. Katai, S., Kato, K., Unno, S., Kang, Y., Saruwatari, M., Ishikawa, N., et al. (2010). Classification of extracellularly recorded neurons by their discharge patterns and their correlates with intracellularly identified neuronal types in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1322-1338.
25. Kimberg, D. Y., Aguirre, G. K., & D'Esposito, M. (2000). Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 189-196.
26. Konishi, S., Nakajima, K., Uchida, I., Kameyama, M., Nakahara, K., Sekihara, K., et al. (1998). Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 80-84.
27. Lewis, J. W., & Van Essen, D. C. (2000). Mapping of architectonic subdivisions in the macaque monkey, with emphasis on parieto-occipital cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 428, 79-111.
28. Mansouri, F. A., Matsumoto, K., & Tanaka, K. (2006). Prefrontal cell activities related to monkeys' success and failure in adapting to rule changes in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test analog. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2745-2756.
29. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
30. Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90-100.
31. Monchi, O., Petrides, M., Petre, V., Worsley, K., & Dagher, A. (2001). Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: Distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 7733-7741.
32. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
33. Mountain, M. A., & Snow, W. G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 108-118.
34. Nakahara, K., Hayashi, T., Konishi, S., & Miyashita, Y. (2002). Functional MRI of macaque monkeys performing a cognitive set-shifting task. Science, 295, 1532-1536.
35. Passingham, R. E. (1972). Non-reversal shifts after selective prefrontal ablations in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Neuropsychologia, 10, 41-46.
36. Quilodran, R., Rothé, M., & Procyk, E. (2008). Behavioral shifts and action valuation in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neuron, 57, 314-325.
37. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 763-797.
38. Ruge, H., Goschke, T., & Braver, T. S. (2009). Separating event-related BOLD components within trials: The partial-trial design revisited. Neuroimage, 47, 501-513.
39. Rushworth, M. F., Hadland, K. A., Gaffan, D., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). The effect of cingulate cortex lesions on task switching and working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 338-353.
40. Rushworth, M. F. S., Paus, T., & Sipila, P. K. (2001). Attention systems and the organization of the human parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 5262-5271.
41. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 1404-1419.
42. Sakai, K., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 75-81.
43. Schultz, W. (2007). Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 259-288.
44. Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000). Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 473-500.
45. Sereno, A. B., & Maunsell, J. H. (1998). Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex. Nature, 395, 500-503.
46. Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (1998). Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on reward. Science, 282, 1335-1338.
47. Sohn, M. H., Ursu, S., Anderson, J. R., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 97, 13448-13453.
48. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2003). Executive control and task-switching in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1357-1364.
49. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2004). Single neurons in posterior parietal cortex of monkeys encode cognitive set. Neuron, 42, 1003-1012.
50. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2007). Correlates of stimulus-response congruence in the posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 194-203.
51. Wallis, J. D., Anderson, K. C., & Miller, E. K. (2001). Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules. Nature, 411, 953-956.
52. Whiete, I. M., & Wise, S. P. (1999). Rule-dependent neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 315-335.
53. Yantis, S., & Serences, J. T. (2003). Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 187-193.