Correlates of stimulus-response congruence in the posterior parietal cortex

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 194-203

  Stoet, Gijsbert ^a,b   Snyder, Lawrence H ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b School of Psychology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; MACACA MULATTA; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846871507     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.194     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Warsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., et al. (2002). A developmental fMRI study of the Stroop Color-Word task. Neuroimage, 16, 61-75.
2. Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230, 456-458.
3. Assad, J. A. (2003). Neural coding of behavioral relevance in parietal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 194-197.
4. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004). Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring; assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms. Neuron, 41, 473-487.
5. Bench, C. J., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S., et al. (1993). Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia, 31, 907-922.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
7. Bushnell, M. C., Goldberg, M. E., & Robinson, D. L. (1981). Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex: I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 755-772.
8. Calton, J. L., Dickinson, A. R., & Snyder, L. H. (2002). Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 580-588.
9. 15O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2, 264-272.
10. Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319-349.
11. Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255, 90-92.
12. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
13. Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2000). Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 387-400.
14. Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1992). Characteristics of "anti" saccades in man. Experimental Brain Research, 89, 415-424.
15. Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. (1969). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 165, 664-672.
16. Gerrig, R. J., & Murphy, G. L. (1992). Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 205-230.
17. Gurd, J. M., Amunts, K., Weiss, P. H., Zafiris, O., Zilles, K., Marshall, J. C., et al. (2002). Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal f luency tasks: An fMRI study with clinical implications. Brain, 125, 1024-1038.
18. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 1-81.
19. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.
20. Langenecker, S. A., Nielson, K. A., & Rao, S. M. (2004). fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference. Neuroimage, 21, 192-200.
21. Larrue, V., Celsis, P., Bes, A., & Marc-Vergnes, J. P. (1994). The functional anatomy of attention in humans: Cerebral blood f low changes induced by reading, naming, and the Stroop effect. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 14, 958-962.
22. Leung, H. C., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., Peterson, B. S., & Gore, J. C. (2000). An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 552-560.
23. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
24. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 128-130.
25. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
26. Mead, L. A., Mayer, A. R., Bobholz, J. A., Woodley, S. J., Cunningham, J. M., Hammeke, T. A., et al. (2002). Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 735-742.
27. Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975). Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 38, 871-908.
28. Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218-228.
29. Nakamura, K., Roesch, M. R., & Olson, C. R. (2005). Neuronal activity in macaque SEF and ACC during performance of tasks involving conflict. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 884-908.
30. Olson, C. R., & Gettner, S. N. (2002). Neuronal activity related to rule and conflict in macaque supplementary eye field. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 664-670.
31. Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 87, 256-259.
32. Peterson, B. S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J. C., Zhang, H., Anderson, A. W., & Gore, J. C. (1999). An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: Evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 1237-1258.
33. Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, 400, 233-238.
34. Premack, D. (1971). Language in chimpanzee? Science, 172, 808-822.
35. R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
36. Schlag-Rey, M., Amador, N., Sanchez, H., & Schlag, J. (1997). Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field. Nature, 390, 398-401.
37. Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1997). Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 386, 167-170.
38. Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (2000). Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: A review. Vision Research, 40, 1433-1441.
39. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2003a). Executive control and task-switching in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1357-1364.
40. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2003b). Task preparation in macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 6, 121-130.
41. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2004). Single neurons in posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of monkeys encode cognitive set. Neuron, 42, 1003-1012.
42. Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2006). Effects of the NMDA antagonist ketamine on task-switching performance: Evidence for specific impairments of executive control. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 1675-1681.
43. Strohner, H., & Stoet, G. (1999). Cognitive compositionality: An activation and evaluation hypothesis. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 152 of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 195-208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
45. Sugrue, L. P., Corrado, G. S., & Newsome, W. T. (2004). Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science, 304, 1782-1787.
46. Taylor, S. F., Kornblum, S., Lauber, E. J., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R. A. (1997). Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies. Neuroimage, 6, 81-92.
47. Toth, L. J., & Assad, J. A. (2002). Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex. Nature, 415, 165-168.
48. Ujhelyi, M. (1996). Is there any intermediate stage between animal communication and language? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 180, 71-76.
49. Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 477-482.
50. Von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464-476.
51. Weissman, D. H., Giesbrecht, B., Song, A. W., Mangun, G. R., & Woldorff, M. G. (2003). Conflict monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex during selective attention to global and local object features. Neuroimage, 19, 1361-1368.
52. Zysset, S., Muller, K., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Color-word matching Stroop task: Separating interference and response conflict. Neuroimage, 13, 29-36.