Three-dimensional ultrasonography for breast malignancy detection

Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 253-261

  Chen, Dar Ren ^a   Lai, Hung Wen ^a  

^a CHANGHUA CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Breast ultrasound; color Doppler; computer aided diagnosis; three dimensional

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; REVIEW; SKIN TUMOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 79955083768     PISSN: 17530059     EISSN: 17530067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1517/17530059.2011.561314     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(2):106-30
2. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden. Int J Cancer 1993;55(6):891-903 (Pubitemid 24005331)
3. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(1):18-27
4. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-63 (Pubitemid 351679706)
5. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75-89 (Pubitemid 46535708)
6. Simpson JF, Page DL. Status of breast cancer prognostication based on histopathologic data. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102(4 Suppl 1):S3-8 (Pubitemid 24345577)
7. Pereira H, Pinder SE, Sibbering DM, et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma. Histopathology 1995;27(3):219-26
8. Beyer T, Moonka R Normal mammography and ultrasonography in the setting of palpable breast cancer. Am J Surg 2003;185(5):416-19 (Pubitemid 36513949)
9. Adler DD, Helvie MA. Mammographic biopsy recommendations. Curr Opin Radiol 1992;4(5):123-9
10. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158(3):521-6
11. Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(6):1373-7
12. Jackson VP, Reynolds HE, Hawes DR. Sonography of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17(5):460-75 (Pubitemid 26337998)
13. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196(1):123-34
14. Fenster A, Downey DB. 3-D Ultrasound imaging: a review. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1996;15(6):41-51 (Pubitemid 26403813)
15. Rotten D, Levaillant JM, Zerat L. Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14(2):114-24 (Pubitemid 29440653)
16. Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, et al. Fetal lip and primary palate: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional US. Radiology 2000;217(1):236-9 (Pubitemid 33097607)
17. Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics 2000;20(2):559-71
18. Hamper UM, Trapanotto V, DeJong MR, et al. Three-dimensional US of the prostate: early experience. Radiology 1999;212(3):719-23 (Pubitemid 29410974)
19. Downey DB, Fenster A. Vascular imaging with a three-dimensional power Doppler system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(3):665-8
20. Meyberg-Solomayer GC, Kraemer B, Bergmann A, et al. Does 3-D sonography bring any advantage to noninvasive breast diagnostics? Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(5):583-9 (Pubitemid 38739362)
21. Huang SF, Chang RF, Chen DR, Moon WK. Characterization of spiculation on ultrasound lesions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23(1):111-21
22. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US. Radiology 2006;240(1):26-32
23. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Lev-ToaffA, et al. Feasibility of performing a virtual patient examination using three-dimensional ultrasonographic data acquired at remote locations. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20(9):941-52 (Pubitemid 32823217)
24. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24(3):371-8 (Pubitemid 40315964)
25. Weismann CF, Forstner R, Prokop E, Rettenbacher T. Three-dimensional targeting: a new three-dimensional ultrasound technique to evaluate needle position during breast biopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16(4):359-64 (Pubitemid 32154674)
26. Fenster A, Surry KJ, Mills GR, Downey DB. 3D ultrasound guided breast biopsy system. Ultrasonics 2004;42(1-9):769-74
27. Hochmuth A, Boehm T, Bitzer C, et al. Differentiation of breast masses using 3-D sonographic and echo-enhancer-based evaluation of the vascular pattern: initial experiences. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28(7):845-51
28. Chen DR, Chang RF, Chen WM, Moon WK. Computer-aided diagnosis for 3-dimensional breast ultrasonography. Arch Surg 2003;138(3):296-302
29. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, et al. Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. Med Phys 2004;31(4):744-54 (Pubitemid 38508854)
30. Gooding MJ, Mellor M, Shipley JA, et al. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005;8(Pt 1):434-41 (Pubitemid 43828280)
31. Gooding MJ, Finlay J, Shipley JA, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of mammary ducts in lactating women: a feasibility study. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29(1):95-103
32. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, et al. Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 1993;15(4):267-85 (Pubitemid 24090199)
33. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology 1999;213(2):407-12
34. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 2003;226(2):504-14
35. Chen DR, Hsiao YH. Computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. J Med Ultrasound 2008;16(1):46-56
36. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999;212(3):817-27 (Pubitemid 29410988)
37. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 2002;224(2):560-8 (Pubitemid 34809142)
38. Hadjiiski L, Chan HP, Sahiner B, et al. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 2004;233(1):255-65 (Pubitemid 39280982)
39. Chen D, Chang RF, Huang YL. Breast cancer diagnosis using self-organizing map for sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26(3):405-11 (Pubitemid 30204552)
40. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL, et al. Texture analysis of breast tumors on sonograms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21(4):308-16
41. Horsch K, Giger ML, Venta LA, Vyborny CJ. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 2002;29(2):157-64 (Pubitemid 34157988)
42. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system® (BI-RADS®) ATLAS. American College of Radiology, Reston, Va 2003
43. Merz E, editor. Use ofthree-dimensional ultrasound mammography to analyze normal breast tissue and solid breast masses. 3-D ultrasonography in obstetric and gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc Philadelphia, Pa; 1998. p. 73-8
44. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, et al. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2007;242(3):716-24
45. Chen DR, Chang RF, Chen CJ, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in margin evaluation for breast tumor excision using Mammotome. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(2):169-79
46. Chen DR, Chang RF, Wu WJ, et al. 3-D breast ultrasound segmentation using active contour model. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(7):1017-26
47. DeJean P, Brackstone M, Fenster A. An intraoperative 3D ultrasound system for tumor margin determination in breast cancer surgery. Med Phys 2010;37(2):564-70
48. Chen DR, Chang RF, Kuo WJ, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28(10):1301-10
49. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Hull A, et al. Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16(4):374-83 (Pubitemid 32154677)
50. Carson PL, Moskalik AP, Govil A, et al. The 3D and 2D color flow display of breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23(6):837-49 (Pubitemid 27349531)
51. Kuo SJ, Hsiao YH, Huang YL, Chen DR. Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors using neural networks and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32(1):97-102
52. LeCarpentier GL, Roubidoux MA, Fowlkes JB, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: assessment of 3D Doppler US indexes for classification in a test population and fourfold cross-validation scheme. Radiology 2008;249(2):463-70