Normal mammography and ultrasonography in the setting of palpable breast cancer

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 416-419

  Beyer, Todd ^a   Moonka, Ravi ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Imaging; Mammography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PALPATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PALPATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0037406604     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00042-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Perdue P., Page D., Nellestein M., et al. Early detection of breast carcinoma a comparison of palpable and non-palpable lesions. Surgery. 111:1992;656-659.
2. Baker L. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project five year summary report. Cancer. 32:1982;194.
3. Vetto J., Pommier R., Schmidt W., et al. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. Am J Surg. 169:1995;519-522.
4. Dennis M.A., Parker S.H., Klaus A.J., et al. Breast biopsy avoidance the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology. 219:2001;186-191.
5. Zonderland H., Coerkamp E., Hermans J., et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology. 213:1999;413-422.
6. Duijm L.E.M., Guit G.L., Zaat J.O.M., et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer. Br J Cancer. 76:1997;377-381.
7. Lister D., Evans A.J., Burrell H.C., et al. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. Clin Radiol. 53:1998;490-492.
8. Soo M.S., Rosen E.L., Baker J.A., et al. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 177:2001;1167-1170.
9. Yang W.T., Mok C.O., King W., et al. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women alternative to mammography? J Ultrasound Med. 15:1996;637-644.
10. Moss H., Britton P., Flower C.D.R., et al. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population? Clin Radiol. 54:1999;676-682.
11. Perre C.I., Koot C.M., de Hooge P., Leguit P. The value of ultrasound in the evaluation of palpable breast tumours a prospective study of 400 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 20:1994;637-640.
12. Kopans D.B., Moore R.H., Slanetz P.J., et al. The specificity of combined mammographic and ultrasonographic evaluation of palpable lumps and palpable thickening. [abstract] Radiology. 213:1999;371.
13. Georgian-Smith D., Taylor K.J., Madjar H., et al. Sonography of palpable breast cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 28:2000;211-216.
14. Skaane P. The additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer;a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 40:1999;486-490.