Restoration of particle size distributions from fiber-optical in-line measurements in fluidized bed processes

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2842-2852

  Fischer, C ^a   Peglow, M ^a   Tsotsas, E ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chord length distribution; Fluidization; Granulation; In line particle size measurement; Particle processing; Powder technology

Indexed keywords

CHORD LENGTH DISTRIBUTION; CHORD LENGTHS; DISCRETIZATIONS; DYNAMIC NOISE; FIBER-OPTICAL; FILTERING TECHNIQUE; FLUIDIZED BED GRANULATION; GROWTH BEHAVIOR; ILL-CONDITIONED; IN-LINE; IN-LINE MEASUREMENTS; IN-LINE PARTICLE SIZE MEASUREMENT; NOISE REDUCTIONS; PARTICLE PROCESSING; PARTICLES SIZES; POWDER TECHNOLOGY; PROCESS PARAMETERS; REAL-TIME DETECTION; SYNERGETIC EFFECT; TRANSFORMATION ALGORITHM;

ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT; DISCRETE FOURIER TRANSFORMS; FLUIDIZATION; FLUIDIZED BED PROCESS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; GRANULATION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY; PROBES; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

PARTICLE SIZE;

EID: 79955027259     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.03.054     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Burggraeve A., Van Den Kerkhof T., Hellings M., Remon J.P., Vervaet C., De Beer T. Evaluation of in-line spatial filter velocimetry as PAT monitoring tool for particle growth during fluid bed granulation. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2010, 76(1):138-146.
2. Chandra Sekhar S., Sreenivas T.V. Adaptive spectrogram vs. adaptive pseudo-Wigner-Ville distribution for instantaneous frequency estimation. Signal Processing 2003, 83:1529-1543.
3. Czapla F., Kail N., Öncül A., Lorenz H., Briesen H., Seidel-Morgenstern A. Application of a recent FBRM-probe model to quantify preferential crystallization of dl-threonine. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2010, 88(11):1494-1504.
4. Davies C.E., Carroll A., Flemmer R. Particle size monitoring in a fluidized bed using pressure fluctuations. Powder Technology 2008, 180(3):307-311.
5. Dernedde, M., Peglow, M., Tsotsas, E., 2010. Stochastic modelling of fluidised bed granulation. In: Proceedings of 17th International Drying Symposium 2010, Magdeburg, Germany, p. 1120.
6. Frake P., Greenhalgh D., Grierson S.M., Hempenstall J.M., Rudd D.R. Process control and end-point determination of a fluid bed granulation by application of near infra-red spectroscopy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1997, 151(1):75-80.
7. Gečiauskas E. Standardization of distributions of the chord length within oval domains. Lithunian Mathematical Journal 1999, No. 4:39.
8. Gille W. Geometric figures with the same chord length probability density function: six examples. Powder Technology 2009, 192:85-91.
9. Heath A.R., Fawell P.D., Bahri P.A., Swift J.D. Estimating average particle size by focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM). Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 2002, 19(2):84-95.
10. Hu X., Cunningham J.C., Winstead D. Study growth kinetics in fluidized bed granulation with at-line FBRM. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2008, 347(1-2):54-61.
11. Kempkes M., Eggers J., Mazzotti M. Measurement of particle size and shape by FBRM and in situ microscopy. Chemical Engineering Science 2008, 63(19):4656-4675.
12. Kullback S., Leibler R.A. On Information and Sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1951, 22(1):79-86.
13. Langston P.A., Burbidge A.S., Jones T.F., Simmons M.J.H. Particle and droplet size analysis from chord measurements using Bayes' theorem. Powder Technology 2001, 116(1):33-42.
14. Li M., Wilkinson D. Determination of non-spherical particle size distribution from chord length measurements. Theoretical analysis. Chemical Engineering Science 2005, 60(12):3251-3265.
15. Li M., Wilkinson D., Patchigolla K. Determination of non-spherical particle size distribution from chord length measurements. Experimental validation, Chemical Engineering Science 2005, 60(18):4992-5003.
16. Liu W., Clark N.N. Relationships between distribution of chord lengths and distributions of bubble sizes including their statistical parameters. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 1995, 21:1073-1088.
17. Ma Y., Zhu J., Chen K., Wu Y., Chen A. Study on growth kinetics of phosphoric acid hemihydrate using FBRM. Journal of Crystal Growth 2009, 312(1):109-113.
18. Mustard D. Uncertainty principle invariant under fractional Fourier transform. Journal of Australian Mathematical Society., Series B 1991, 33.
19. Närvänen T., Lipsanen T., Antikainen O., Räikkönen H., Heinämäki J., Yliruusi J. Gaining fluid bed process understanding by in-line particle size analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2009, 98(3):1110-1117.
20. Nawab S.H., Dorken E. A framework for quality versus efficiency tradeoffs in STFT analysis. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1995, 43(No. 4).
21. Ozaktas H.M., Aytur O. Fractional Fourier domains. Signal Processing 1995, 46(1):119-124. September 1995.
22. Petrak A., Rauh D. Particle probe for the in-line determination of the particle shape, size and velocity. Particulate Science and Technology 2006, 24:381-394.
23. Petrak D. Simultaeous measurements of particle-size and velocity with spatial filtering technique in comparison with Coulter multisizer and laser Doppler velocimetry. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 2001, 19:391-400.
24. Preikschat, F.K., Preikschat, E., 1989. Apparatus and Method for Particle Analysis. United States Patent 4871251.
25. Ruf A., Worlitschek J., Mazotti M. Modelling and experimental analysis of PSD measurements through FBRM. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 2000, 17:167-169.
26. Scott D., Boxman A., Jochen E. In-line particle characterization. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 1998, 15:47-50.
27. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 1948, 27:379-423. 623-656.
28. Simmons M.J.H., Langston P.A., Burbidge A.S. Particle and droplet size analysis from chord distributions. Powder Technology 1999, 102(1):75-83.
29. Solomon H. Geometric Probability 1978, Society for Industrial Mathematics (US), Philadelphia.
30. Tadayyon A., Rohani S. Determination of particle size distribution by Par-Tec® 100: modeling and experimental results. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 1998, 15(3):127-135.
31. Tan H.S., Salman A.D., Hounslow M.J. Kinetics of fluidised bed melt granulation I: the effect of process variables. Chemical Engineering Science 2006, 61:1585-1601.
32. Thielmann F., Naderi M., Ansari M.A., Stepanek F. The effect of primary particle surface energy on agglomeration rate in fluidised bed wet granulation. Powder Technology 2008, 181(2):160-168.
33. Tok A.T., Goh X., Ng W.K., Tan R.B.H. Monitoring granulation rate processes using three PAT tools in a pilot-scale fluidized bed. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2008, 9(No. 4):1083-1091.
34. Worlitschek J., Hocker T., Mazzotti M. Restoration of PSD from chord length distribution data using the method of projections onto convex sets. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 2005, 22.