Conception, development and implementation of an e-Government maturity model in public agencies

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 176-187

  Valdés, Gonzalo ^a   Solar, Mauricio ^a   Astudillo, Hernán ^a   Iribarren, Marcelo ^a   Concha, Gastón ^a   Visconti, Marcello ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

Author keywords

E Government readiness; IT governance; Maturity model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955020025     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersen K.V., Henriksen H.Z. e-Government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government information quarterly 2006, 23(2):236-248.
2. Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Delivering Australian Government Services: Service delivery capability model 2006.
3. Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) The Australian Government business process interoperability framework 2007.
4. Comité de Ministros para el Desarrollo Digital (CMDD) Estrategia Digital [Digital Strategy] 2007-2012 Retrieved from. http://www.estrategiadigital.gob.cl.
5. Cresswell A., Pardo T., Canestraro D. Digital capability assessment for e-Government: A multi-dimensional approach. EGOV 2006, Lecture notes in computer science 2006, Vol. 4084:293-304. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. Cresswell A.M., Pardo T.A., Hassan S. Assessing capability for justice information sharing. Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on digital government research 2007, 122-130. Digital Government Society of North America, Philadelphia, PA.
7. Esteves J., Joseph R.C. A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects. Government information quarterly 2008, 25(1):118-132.
8. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change 2001, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
9. Gil-García J.R., Pardo T.A. E-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government information quarterly 2005, 22(2):187-216.
10. Gottschalk P. Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government information quarterly 2009, 26(1):75-81.
11. Government of Canada e-Government capacity check diagnostic tool (Developed by KPMG)., Retrieved June 25, 2009, from. http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/emf-cag/risk-risques/tools-outils-eng.asp.
12. Guijarro L. Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government information quarterly 2007, 24(1):89-101.
13. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Programa de fortalecimiento de la estrategia digital de Chile [Multiphase program for the strengthening of Chile's digital strategy] Retrieved from. http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=383309.
14. Interoperable Delivery of European eGovernment Services to public Administrations, Businesses and Citizens (IDABC) European interoperability framework for pan-European eGovernment services v1.0 2004, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15. Iribarren M., Concha G., Valdes G., Solar M., Villarroel M., Gutiérrez P., et al. Capability maturity framework for e-Government: A multi-dimensional model and assessing tool. EGOV 2008, Lecture notes in computer science 2008, Vol. 5184:136-147. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. ISO/IEC ISO/IEC TR 15504: Information technology - Software process assessment 1998.
17. IT Governance Institute COBIT 4.1 2007, ISACA, Rolling Meadows, IL.
18. Klievink B., Janssen M. Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government information quarterly 2009, 26(2):275-284.
19. Layne K., Lee J. Developing fully functional e-Government: A four stage model. Government information quarterly 2001, 18(2):122-136.
20. Makolm J. A holistic reference framework for e-Government: The practical proof of a scientific concept. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2006, 77.1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
21. Maumbe B.M., Owei V., Alex H. Questioning the pace and pathway of e-Government development in Africa: A case study of South Africa's Cape Gateway project. Government information quarterly 2008, 25(4):757-777.
22. Montagna J.M. A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic government proposals. Electronic commerce research and applications 2005, 4(3):204-219.
23. National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO) NASCIO enterprise architecture maturity model version 1.3 2003.
24. Secretaría de Economía de México (SEM) Modelo de procesos para la industria de software (MoProSoft) v1.3 [Process model for software industry v1.3] 2005.
25. Secretaría de Economía de México (SEM) Método de evaluación de procesos para la industria de software (EvalProSoft) v1.1 [Process assessment method for software industry v1.1] 2005.
26. Shahkooh K.A., Saghafi F., Abdollahi A. A proposed model for e-Government maturity. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on information and communication technologies: From theory to applications 2008, 1-5. IEEE Computer Society.
27. Software Engineering Institute (SEI) CMMI for development, version 1.2 2006.
28. Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, version 1.2: Method definition document 2006.
29. Solar M., Astudillo H., Valdes G., Iribarren M., Concha G. Identifying weaknesses for Chilean e-Government implementation in public agencies with maturity model. EGOV 2009, Lecture notes in computer science 2009, Vol. 5693:151-162. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
30. U.S.Department of Defense Levels of information systems interoperability (LISI) 1998, C4ISR Interoperability Working Group, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.
31. United Nations, American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Benchmarking e-Government: A global perspective 2002, United Nations, New York.
32. Valdes G., Iribarren M., Concha G., Solar M., Astudillo H., Visconti M., et al. Identifying relevant national e-Government implementations for an emerging country: A selective survey. EGOV 2008: Ongoing research and projects, Schriftenreihe Informatik Vol. 27 2008, 141-149. Trauner Verlag, Linz, Austria. E. Ferro, H.J. Scholl, M.A. Wimmer (Eds.).
33. Wimmer M., Tambouris E. Online one-stop government: A working framework and requirements. Information systems: The e-Business challenge 2002, 117-130. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. R. Traunmüller (Ed.).
34. Yildiz M. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government information quarterly 2007, 24(3):646-665.