Potential impact of process parameters upon the bacterial diversity in the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of beet silage

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 5692-5701

  Krakat, Niclas ^a,b   Schmidt, Stefan ^c   Scherer, Paul ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; ARDRA; Bacterial population dynamics; Beet silage; Energy crops

Indexed keywords

ACTINOBACTERIA; ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION; ARDRA; BACTERIAL DIVERSITY; BACTERIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; BEET SILAGE; ENERGY CROPS; FIRMICUTES; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; OPERATIONAL TAXONOMIC UNITS; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PLANCTOMYCETES; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; RIBOSOMAL DNA; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS;

BACTERIOLOGY; CROPS; MANURES; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

RIBOSOME DNA;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIUM; ENERGY CROP; FERMENTATION; INOCULATION; MANURE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SILAGE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUBSTRATE; SUGAR BEET;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL DIVERSITY; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BEET; BIOREACTOR; CHLOROFLEXI; CLOSTRIDIA; ENERGY CROP; MANURE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTRICTION MAPPING; SILAGE; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BASE SEQUENCE; BETA VULGARIS; BIODIVERSITY; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DNA PRIMERS; FERMENTATION; MANURE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

ACIDOBACTERIA; ACTINOBACTERIA; ALCALIGENACEAE; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; CHLOROFLEXI; CHLOROFLEXI (CLASS); CLOSTRIDIA; FIRMICUTES; OTUS; PLANCTOMYCETES; THERMOTOGAE; THERMOTOGAE (CLASS);

EID: 79955001056     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.108     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ahring B.K., Sandberg M., Angelidaki I. Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 43(3):559-565.
2. Ashelford K.E., Chuzhanova N.A., Fry J.C., Jones A.J., Weightman A.J. At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71(12):7724-7736.
3. Chouari R., Le Paslier D., Daegelen P., Ginestet P., Weissenbach J., Sghir A. Novel predominant archaeal and bacterial groups revealed by molecular analysis of an anaerobic sludge digester. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7(8):1104-1115.
4. Cirne D.G., Lehtomäki A., Björnsson L., Blackall L.L. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103(3):516-527.
5. Cobb S.A., Hill D.T. Using nitrogen ratio as an indicator of biomass retention and steady-state in anaerobic fermentation. Trans. ASAE 1990, 33(1):282-287.
6. Collins G., Woods A., McHugh S., Carton M., O'Flaherty V. Microbial community structure and methanogenic activity during start-up of psychrophilic anaerobic digesters treating synthetic industrial wastewaters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2003, 46(2):159-170.
7. Curtis T., Sloan W., Scannell J. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99(16):10494-10499.
8. Demirel B., Scherer P. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32(3):203-209.
9. DIN 38414-8, 1985. German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge; sludge and sediments (group S); determination of the amenability to anaerobic digestion (S8).
10. Fernandez A.S., Hashsham S.A., Dollhopf S.L., Raskin L., Glagoleva O., Dazzo F.B., Hickey R.F., Criddle C.S., Tiedje J.M. Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66(9):4058-4067.
11. Forney L., Liu W., Guckert J., Kumagai Y., Namkung E., Nishihara T., Larson R. Structure of microbial communities in activated sludge: potential implications for assessing the biodegradability of chemicals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2001, 49(1):40-53.
12. Fuerst J. The planctomycetes: emerging models for microbial ecology, evolution and cell biology. Microbiology 1995, 141(7):1493-1506.
13. Grimm V., Schmidt E., Wissel C. On the application of stability concepts in ecology. Ecol. Model 1992, 63(1-4):143-161.
14. Hugenholtz P., Goebel B.M., Pace N.R. Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180(18):4765-4774.
15. Jumas-Bilak E., Roudière L., Marchandin H. Description of 'Synergistetes' phyl. nov. and emended description of the phylum 'Deferribacteres' and of the family Syntrophomonadaceae, phylum 'Firmicutes'. Int. J. Systc. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59:1028-1035.
16. Klocke M., Mähnert P., Mundt K., Souidi K., Linke B. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 30(2):139-151.
17. Krakat N., Schmidt S., Scherer P. The mesophilic fermentation of renewable biomass - does hydraulic retention time regulate diversity of methanogens?. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76(18):6322-6326.
18. Krakat N., Westphal A., Satke K., Schmidt S., Scherer P. The microcosm of a biogas fermenter: comparison of moderate hyperthermophilic (60°C) with thermophilic (55°C) conditions. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 10(6):520-527.
19. Krakat N., Westphal A., Schmidt S., Scherer P. Anaerobic digestion of renewable biomass - thermophilic temperature governs population dynamics of methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76(6):1842-1850.
20. Krause L., Diaz N.N., Edwards R.A., Gartemann K.H., Kromeke H., Neuweger H., Pühler A., Runte K.J., Schlüter A., Stoye J., Szczepanowski R., Tauch A., Goesmann A. Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136(1-2):91-101.
21. Lane D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991, 115-175. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York. E. Stackebrandt, M. Goodfellow (Eds.).
22. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83(1):37-46.
23. Nesbø C.L., Dlutek M., Zhaxybayeva O., Doolittle W.F. Evidence for existence of "mesotogas,'' members of the order Thermotogales adapted to low-temperature environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72(7):5061.
24. Neumann L., Scherer P. Impact of bioaugmentation by compost on the performance and ecology of an anaerobic digester fed with energy crops. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:2931-2935.
25. Rivière D., Desvignes V., Pelletier E., Chaussonnerie S., Guermazi S., Weissenbach J., Li T., Camacho P., Sghir A. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J. 2009, 3(6):700-714.
26. Scherer P., Lehmann K., Schmidt O., Demirel B. Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono-substrate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102(3):736-748.
27. Scherer P.A., Dobler S., Rohardt S., Loock R., Büttner B., Nöldeke P., Brettschuh A. Continuous biogas production from fodder beet silage as sole substrate. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48(4):229-233.
28. Sekiguchi Y. Yet-to-be cultured microorganisms relevant to methane fermentation processes. Microbes Environ. 2006, 21(1):1-15.
29. Sekiguchi Y., Kamagata Y., Syutsubo K., Ohashi A., Harada H., Nakamura K. Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. Microbiology 1998, 144:2655-2665.
30. Shin S., Lee S., Lee C., Hwang K., Hwang S. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Biores. Technol. 2010, 101:9461-9470.
31. Souidi K., Mumme J., Mundt K., Nettmann E., Bergmann I., Linke B., Klocke M. Microbial diversity in a biogas-producing co-fermentation of maize silage and bovine manure. Agric. Eng. Res. Agrartech. 2007, 13:197-206.
32. Strous M., Fuerst J., Kramer E., Logemann S., Muyzer G., Van De Pas-Schoonen K., Webb R., Kuenen J., Jetten M. Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete. Nature 1999, 400(6743):446-449.
33. ter Braak C.F.J. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetation 1987, 69(1):69-77.
34. Wang H., Lehtomäki A., Tolvanen K., Puhakka J., Rintala J. Impact of crop species on bacterial community structure during anaerobic co-digestion of crops and cow manure. Biores. Technol. 2009, 100(7):2311-2315.
35. Weiland P. Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 109(1-3):263-274.
36. Yamada T., Sekiguchi Y., Imachi H., Kamagata Y., Ohashi A., Harada H. Diversity, localization, and physiological properties of filamentous microbes belonging to Chloroflexi subphylum I in mesophilic and thermophilic methanogenic sludge granules. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71(11):7493-7503.
37. Zarzycki J., Brecht V., Müller M., Fuchs G. Identifying the missing steps of the autotrophic 3-hydroxypropionate CO2 fixation cycle in Chloroflexus aurantiacus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(50):21317-21322.
38. Zhang Y., Cañas E., Zhu Z., Linville J., Chen S., He Q. Robustness of archaeal populations in anaerobic co-digestion of dairy and poultry wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 102:779-785.
39. Zhu C., Zhang J., Tang Y., Zhengkai X., Song R. Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a biogas reactor fed with swine feces as the mono-substrate by mcrA analysis. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 166:27-35.