Impact of bioaugmentation by compost on the performance and ecology of an anaerobic digester fed with energy crops

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 2931-2935

  Neumann, L ^a   Scherer, P ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Bioaugmentation; Biogas; Compost; Microbial community

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; ARCHAEAL POPULATION; BIO-AUGMENTATION; COMPOST; ENERGY CROPS; FERMENTORS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GAS PRODUCTIONS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROGENOTROPHIC METHANOGENS; MESOPHILIC; METHANOGENIC COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES;

BIOGAS; COMPOSTING; CROPS; ECOLOGY; FERMENTERS; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MANURES; PULP DIGESTERS; SEWAGE SLUDGE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPOST; ENERGY CROP; FERMENTATION; FLUORESCENCE; GAS PRODUCTION; HYBRIDIZATION; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE; SILAGE; SLUDGE; SUBSTRATE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BEET; BIOAUGMENTATION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOREACTOR; BIOREMEDIATION; COMPOST; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CROP; FEEDING ECOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GAS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; INOCULATION; MANURE; MESOPHILE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SILAGE; SLUDGE;

BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BETA VULGARIS; BIOREACTORS; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ECOSYSTEM; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

ARCHAEA; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 78650804143     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.068     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bauer C., Korthals M., Gronauer A., Lebuhn M. Methanogens in biogas production from renewable resources-a novel molecular population analysis approach. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58(7):1433-1439.
2. Cirne D., Björnsson L., Alves M., Mattiasson B. Effects of bioaugmentation by an anaerobic lipolytic bacterium on anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81(11):1745-1752.
3. Crocetti G., Murto M., Bjornsson L. An update and optimisation of oligonucleotide probes targeting methanogenic Archaea for use in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 65(1):194-201.
4. Daims H., Bruhl A., Amann R., Schleifer K.H., Wagner M. The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: Development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 22(3):434-444.
5. Demirel B., Scherer P. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 7(2):173-190.
6. Derikx P., de Jong G., Op den Camp H., van der Drift C., van Griensven L., Vogels G. Isolation and characterization of thermophilic methanogenic bacteria from mushroom compost. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1989, 62(4):251-257.
7. Doddema H.J., Vogels G.D. Improved identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1978, 36(5):752-754.
8. Gerbens-Leenes W., Hoekstra A.Y., van der Meer T.H. The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106(25):10219-10223.
9. Klocke M., Mähnert P., Mundt K., Souidi K., Linke B. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 30(2):139-151.
10. Krakat, N., Westphal, A., Satke, K., Schmidt, S., Scherer, P. 2010a. The microcosm of a biogas fermenter: Comparison of moderate hyperthermophilic (60°C) with thermophilic (55°C) conditions. Eng Life Sci, n/a. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201000064.
11. Krakat N., Westphal A., Schmidt S., Scherer P. Anaerobic digestion of renewable biomass: Thermophilic temperature governs methanogen population dynamics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76(6):1842-1850.
12. Krause L., Diaz N.N., Edwards R.A., Gartemann K.H., Kromeke H., Neuweger H., Puhler A., Runte K.J., Schluter A., Stoye J., Szczepanowski R., Tauch A., Goesmann A. Taxonomic composition and gene content of a methane-producing microbial community isolated from a biogas reactor. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136(1-2):91-101.
13. Küsel K., Drake H.L. Anaerobic capacities of leaf litter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62(11):4216-4219.
14. Nettmann E., Bergmann I., Mundt K., Linke B., Klocke M. Archaea diversity within a commercial biogas plant utilizing herbal biomass determined by 16S rDNA and mcrA analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105(6):1835-1850.
15. Nielsen H.B., Mladenovska Z., Ahring B.K. Bioaugmentation of a two-stage thermophilic (68 degrees C/55 degrees C) anaerobic digestion concept for improvement of the methane yield from cattle manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97(6):1638-1643.
16. Raskin L., Poulsen L.K., Noguera D.R., Rittmann B.E., Stahl D.A. Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60(4):1241-1248.
17. Reichle C., Sander P. The use of rotten plant litter to benefit the degradation of sewage sludge in not proper working digesters and limited degradable industrial waste water. Gesundheits-Ingenieur 1935, 58(36):558-559.
18. Saravanane R., Murthy D.V., Krishnaiah K. Bioaugmentation and anaerobic treatment of pharmaceutical effluent in fluidized bed reactor. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2001, 36(5):779-791.
19. Schauer-Gimenez A.E., Zitomer D.H., Maki J.S., Struble C.A. Bioaugmentation for improved recovery of anaerobic digesters after toxicant exposure. Water Res. 2010, 44(12):3555-3564.
20. Scherer P., Lippert H., Wolff G. Composition of the major elements and trace elements of 10 methanogenic bacteria determined by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1983, 5(3):149-163.
21. Scherer P.A., Vollmer G.R., Fakhouri T., Martensen S. Development of a methanogenic process to degrade exhaustively the organic fraction of municipal "grey waste" under thermophilic and hyperthermophilic conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41(3):83-91.
22. Scherer P.A., Dobler S., Rohardt S., Loock R., Buettner B., Noeldeke P., Brettschuh A. Continuous biogas production from fodder beet silage as sole substrate. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48(4):229-233.
23. Scherer P., Lehmann K., Schmidt O., Demirel B. Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono-substrate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102(3):736-748.
24. Scherer P., Neumann L., Demirel B., Schmidt O., Unbehauen M. Long term fermentation studies about the nutritional requirements for biogasification of fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33:873-881.
25. Schmack, D., Reuter, M. 2010. Methanogenic Microorganisms for Generating Biogas. in: WO Patent WO/2010/115,424.
26. Stahl D.A., Amann R.I. Development and application of nucleic acid probes. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics 1991, 205-248. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York. E. Stackebrandt, M. Goodfellow (Eds.).
27. Stevens N. The application of bioaugmentation to waste water treatment. Int. biodeterioration 1989, 25(1-3):87-95.
28. Thummes K., Schaefer J., Kaempfer P., Jaeckel U. Thermophilic methanogenic Archaea in compost material: Occurrence, persistence and possible mechanisms for their distribution to other environments. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 30(8):634-643.
29. Tilche A., Galatola M. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: A qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57(11):1683-1692.
30. Wallner G., Amann R., Beisker W. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 1993, 14(2):136-143.