Demand for sanitation in Salvador, Brazil: A hybrid choice approach

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1325-1332

  Santos, Andreia C ^a   Roberts, Jennifer A ^a   Barreto, Mauricio L ^b   Cairncross, Sandy ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Hybrid choice model; Mixed logit; Sanitation; Sewerage system

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; INVESTMENT; LOGIT ANALYSIS; SANITATION; SEWER NETWORK; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BRAZIL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; MALE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRIVACY; PROPHYLAXIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SANITATION; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADULT; BRAZIL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SANITATION; SEWAGE; SOCIAL CLASS; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

BAHIA; BRAZIL; SALVADOR;

EID: 79954743960     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. GAUSS 8.0 2006, Aptech Systems, Inc (Aptech), Aptech, Washington.
2. Avaliaçao do impacto epidemiológico do programa de saneamento ambiental da Baia de Todos os Santos (Bahia Azul) 2006, Instituto de Saude Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador. M.L. Barreto (Ed.).
3. Barreto M.L., Genser B., Strina A., Teixeira M.G., Assis A.M.O., Rego R.F., et al. Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort studies. Lancet 2007, 370(9599):1622-1628.
4. Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D., Gärling T., Gopinath D., Walker J., Bolduc D., et al. Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters 1999, 10:187-203.
5. Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D., Train K., Walker J., Bhat C., Bierlaire M., et al. Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges. Marketing Letters 2002, 13(3):163-175.
6. Bolduc D., Ben-Akiva M. Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: Applicability to large scale models 2005, Elsevier, Boston.
7. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994, 8(4):45-64.
8. Ding Z., Ng F. A new way of developing semantic differential scales with personal construct theory. Construction Management and Economics 2008, 26(11):1213-1226.
9. Domencich T., McFadden D. Urban travel demand: A behavioral analysis 1975, North-Holland Publishing Corporation, New York.
10. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilios (PNAD) 2008, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Available in. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/trabalhoerendimento/pnad2008/default.shtm.
11. Jenkins M.W. Sanitation promotion in developing countries: Why the latrines of Benin are few and far between 1999, University of California, Davis, Department of Civil and environmental Engineering.
12. Jenkins M.W., Scott B. Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64:2427-2442.
13. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 2003, 93(5):1449-1475.
14. Knetsch J.L., Sinden J.A. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1994, 99(3):507-521.
15. Larrea C.K., Barreto M.L. Salud ambiental urbana; aproximaciones antropológicas y epidemiológicas sobre la evaluación de un programa de alcantarillado en contexto de grandes desigualdades sociales. Quaderns de l'Institut Català d'Antropologia 2009, 22:71-99.
16. Liao T.F. Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models 1994, Sage Publications, Iowa.
17. Maelli F., Rubin D.B. Assumptions allowing the estimation of direct causal effects. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 112:79-87.
18. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. Microeconomic theory 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
19. McFadden D. Economic choices. The American Economic Review 2001, 91:351-378.
20. Moffitt R. Causal analysis in population research: an economist's perspective. Population and Development Review 2003, 29(3):448-458.
21. Morikawa T., Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D. Incorporating psychometric data in econometric choice models 1996, Massachusetts Institute of technology, Massachusetts, Working paper.
22. Persson T.H. Welfare calculations in models of the demand for sanitation. Applied Economics 2002, 34:1509-1518.
23. Phaneuf D.J., Carbone J.C., Herriges J.A. Non-price equilibria for non-marketed goods 2007, Frontiers of Environmental Economics Workshop, Washington.
24. Rubin D.B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomised and nonrandomised studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 1974, 66:668-701.
25. Shordt K., van Wijk C., Brikke F. Monitoring millennium development goals for water and sanitation: A review of experiences and challenges 2004, IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, Delft.
26. Tesh S.N., Paes-Machado E. Sewers, garbage, and environmentalism in Brazil. Journal of Environment & Development 2004, 13:42-72.
27. Train K. Halton sequences for mixed logit 1999, University of California, Berkley, Department of Economics. Available in. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/wp/train0899.pdf.
28. Train K., Wilson W.W. Econometric analysis of stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices 2007, University of California, Berkley, Department of Economics. Available in. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/%7etrain/spoffrp.pdf.
29. Walker J.L. Extended discrete choice models: Integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables 2001, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
30. Walker J.L. Opening up the black box: enrichment behavioral models of spatial and travel choices. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14(5):396-398.