Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 221-228

  Seigneurin, Arnaud ^a,b   Exbrayat, C ^c   Labarere J ^a,b   Delafosse, P ^a   Poncet, F ^a   Colonna, M ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

^c Office de Lutte Contre le Cancer   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; False positive; Mass screening; Re attendance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 79954659175     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1118-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. JG Elmore K Armstrong CD Lehman SW Fletcher 2005 Screening for breast cancer JAMA 293 1245 1256 15755947 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2MXit1Wrs74%3D (Pubitemid 40327910)
2. BC Yankaskas CN Klabunde R Ancelle-Park G Rennert H Wang J Fracheboud, et al. 2004 International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done? J Med Screen 11 187 193 15624239 10.1258/0969141042467430 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cnksF2rsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40006742)
3. JG Elmore MB Barton VM Moceri S Polk PJ Arena SW Fletcher 1998 Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations N Engl J Med 338 1089 1096 9545356 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ps1Kitw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28227478)
4. NT Brewer T Salz SE Lillie 2007 Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms Ann Intern Med 146 502 510 17404352 (Pubitemid 351650559)
5. J Brett C Bankhead B Henderson E Watson J Austoker 2005 The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review Psychooncology 14 917 938 15786514 10.1002/pon.904 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrotVamtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41701209)
6. C Lampic E Thurfjell PO Sjoden 2003 The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer Eur J Cancer 39 1730 1737 12888368 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00451-3 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3szlsFCnuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36897610)
7. A Seigneurin C Exbrayat J Labarere M Colonna 2009 Comparison of interval breast cancer rates for two-versus single-view screening mammography: a population-based study Breast 18 284 288 19713113 10.1016/j.breast.2009.07.007 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mjls1Gqtg%3D%3D
8. A Billette de Villemeur C Exbrayat A Garnier R Ancelle-Park JP Ferley C Jestin 2007 Evaluation of a combined screening programme for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers in France Eur J Cancer Prev 16 26 35 17220701 10.1097/01.cej.0000228399.30235.bc (Pubitemid 46115911)
9. J Stines 2007 BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties Eur J Radiol 61 224 234 17178447 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.038 (Pubitemid 46096701)
10. RG Pinckney BM Geller M Burman B Littenberg 2003 Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography Am J Med 114 120 125 12586231 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01438-9 (Pubitemid 36183593)
11. SS Hofvind H Wang S Thoresen 2003 The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result Cancer Causes Control 14 391 398 12846372 10.1023/A:1023918610664 (Pubitemid 36735110)
12. J Fracheboud HJ de Koning PM Beemsterboer R Boer JH Hendriks AL Verbeek, et al. 1998 Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening Int J Cancer 75 694 698 9495236 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0215(19980302)75:5<694::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-U 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7lsVKhtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28145815)
13. MA Ganott JH Sumkin JL King AH Klym VJ Catullo CS Cohen, et al. 2006 Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer? Radiology 238 793 800 16505392 10.1148/radiol.2383050852 (Pubitemid 43289909)
14. LM Schwartz S Woloshin HC Sox B Fischhoff HG Welch 2000 US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey BMJ 320 1635 1640 10856064 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1635 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsVejsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30364633)
15. AM Chiarelli V Moravan E Halapy V Majpruz V Mai RK Tatla 2003 False-positive result and reattendance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program J Med Screen 10 129 133 14561264 10.1258/096914103769011021 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3svotlGmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38296848)
16. MM Johnson TG Hislop L Kan AJ Coldman A Lai 1996 Compliance with the screening mammography program of British Columbia: will she return? Can J Public Health 87 176 180 8771920 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmslyjtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26265712)
17. IM Lipkus S Halabi TS Strigo BK Rimer 2000 The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening Psychooncology 9 402 410 11038478 10.1002/1099-1611(200009/10)9:5<402::AID-PON475>3.3.CO;2- L 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjtVKhsQ%3D%3D
18. I O'Sullivan S Sutton S Dixon N Perry 2001 False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening J Med Screen 8 145 148 11678554 10.1136/jms.8.3.145 (Pubitemid 32929840)
19. AR Aro HJ de Koning P Absetz M Schreck 2001 Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program Breast Cancer Res Treat 70 145 153 11768605 10.1023/A:1012939228916 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2Fkt1Crsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33139673)
20. CN Klabunde H Sancho-Garnier S Taplin S Thoresen N Ohuchi R Ballard-Barbash 2002 Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries Int J Qual Health Care 14 449 461 12515331 10.1093/intqhc/14.6.449 (Pubitemid 36054418)
21. J Brett J Austoker 2001 Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance J Public Health Med 23 292 300 11873891 10.1093/pubmed/23.4.292 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387ktlGrtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34087292)
22. KD McCaul AD Branstetter DM Schroeder RE Glasgow 1996 What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review Health Psychol 15 423 429 8973921 10.1037/0278-6133.15.6. 423 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ivFCisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126459102)
23. Vernon SW (1999) Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:101-119
24. SB Andersen I Vejborg M von Euler-Chelpin 2008 Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme Acta Oncol 47 550 555 18465321 10.1080/02841860801935483 (Pubitemid 351878440)