The Norwegian breast cancer screening program: Re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result

Cancer Causes and Control

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 391-398

  Hofvind, Solveig S H ^a   Wang, Hege ^a   Thoresen, Steinar ^a  

^a CANCER REGISTRY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Experiences; Intentions; Mammography; Re attendance; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; NORWAY; PAIN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; TIME;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0038039258     PISSN: 09575243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023918610664     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL (1995) Efficacy of screening mammography. A recta-analysis. JAMA 273: 149-154.
2. Tabàr L, Vitak B, Hsiu-Hsi TC, Ming-Fang Y, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trail. Cancer 91: 1724-1731.
3. Nystöm L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359: 904-905.
4. Rimer BK, Bluman LG (1997) The psychosocial consequences of mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22: 131-138.
5. Gram IT, Lurid E, Slenker SE (1990) Quality of life following a false positive mammogram. Br J Cancer 62: 1018-1022.
6. Aro AR, Pilvikki AS, van-Elderen TM, van-der-Ploeg E, van-der-Kamp LJ (2000) False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress - breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer 36: 1089-1097.
7. Ekeberg O, Skjauff H, Karesen R (2001) Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distress. The Breast 10: 20-24.
8. Bakker DA, Lightfoot NE, Steggles S, Jackson C (1998) The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 25: 115-121.
9. Løken K, Steine S, Laerum E (1998) Mammography; influence of departmental sspractice and womens characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Qual Health Care 7: 136-141.
10. Paskett ED, Rimer BK (1995) Psykchosocial effects of abnormal pap tests and mammograms: a review. J Women's Health 4: 73-81.
11. O'Sullivan I, Sutton S, Dixon S, Perry N (2001) False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening. J Mad Screen 8: 145-148.
12. O'Byrne AM, Kavanagh AM, Ugoni A, Diver F (2000) Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme. J Med Screen 7: 190-194.
13. Wang H, Karesen R, Hervik A, Thoresen SO (2001) Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening. Cancer Causes Control 12: 39-45.
14. Ottestad PM (1996) IT solutions in a centrally organized mammography screening in Norway. Med Inform Europe 34: 54-57.
15. Bathes CJ, To T, Wall C (1990) Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study. A questionnaire survey. Cancer 65: 1663-1669.
16. Gram IT, Slenker SE (1992) Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited. Am J Public Health 82: 249-251.
17. McNoe B, Richardson A, Elwood J (1996) Factors affecting participating in mammography screening. N Z Med J 109: 359-361.
18. Aro AR, de-Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M (1999) Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6: 82-88.
19. Schofield PE, Cockburn J, Hill DJ, Reading D (1994) Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screen 1: 144-149.
20. Cole SR, Bryant CA, McDermott RJ, Sorrell C, Flynn M (1997) Beliefs and mammography screening. Am J Prev Med 13: 439-443.
21. Otsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Screening for breast cancer mammography. (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD 001877.
22. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358: 1340-1342.
23. Kashikar ZS, Keefe FJ, Komguth P, Beaupre P, Holzberg A, Delong D (1997) Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a preliminary study. Pain 73: 165-172.
24. Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M (1998) Once is enough-why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 111: 180-183.
25. Bruyninckx E, Mortelmans D, Van-Goethem M, Van-Hove E (1999) Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening. Soc Sci Med 49: 933-941.
26. Keemers-Gels ME, Groenendijk RP, van den Heuvel JH, Boetes C, Peer PG, Wobbes TH (2000) Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60: 235-240.
27. Sutton S, Saidi G, Bickler G, Hunter J (1995) Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a tree wave prospective study in England. J Epidemiol Comm Health 49: 413-418.
28. Bastani R, Kaplan CP, Maxwell AE, Nisenbaum R, Pearce J, Marcus AC (1995) Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los-Angeles. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2: 161-167.
29. Sheeran P, Orbell S (2002) Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol 19: 283-289.
30. Tinkler C, Pegington K, Baldwin R (2001) Breast screening attendance: making better use of appointment system. J Med Screen 8: 36-38.
31. Hayes C, O'Herlihy B, Hynes M, Johnson Z (1999) The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening. Ir J Med Sci 168: 29-32.
32. Hyndman JCC, Holman CDJ, Dawes VP (2000) Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. J Med Screen 7: 141-145.
33. Drossaert C, Boer H, Seydel E (2001) Does mammography screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening? J Med Screen 8: 204-212.
34. Lerman CE, Rimer BK (1993) Psychosocial impact of cancer screening. Oncology 4: 67-72.
35. Lerman C, Truck B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF (1991) Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114: 657-661.
36. Miller D, Martin I, Herbison P (2002) Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD 002942.
37. Rutter D (2000) Attendance and reattendance for breast cancer screening: a prospective 3-year test of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 5: 1-13.
38. Conner M, Armitage C (1998) Extending the theory of planned behaviour: A review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 28: 1429-1464.