Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 188-201

  Gozzi, Marta ^a,b   Cherubini, Paolo ^a   Papagno, Costanza ^a   Bricolo, Emanuela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTUITION; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; THINKING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; INTUITION; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; THINKING;

EID: 79954632015     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0296-1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baddeley, A., & Della Sala, S. (1996). Working memory and executive control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1397-1404.
2. Barry, D., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Predictors of decision-making on the Iowa gambling task: Independent effects of lifetime history of substance use disorders and performance on the Trail Making Test. Brain and Cognition, 66, 243-252.
3. Bechara, A., Damasio, A., Damasio, H., & Anderson, W. S. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
4. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, W. S. (1998). Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 426-437.
5. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189-2202.
6. Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (2003). Real vs. facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 53, 207-210.
7. Buelow, M. T., & Suhr, J. A. (2009). Construct validity of the Iowa gambling task. Neuropsychology Review, 19, 102-114.
8. Cavallaro, R., Cavedini, P., Mistretta, P., Bassi, T., Angelone, S. M., Ubbiali, A., et al. (2003). Basal-corticofrontal circuits in schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A controlled, double dissociation study. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 437-443.
9. Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D'Annucci, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 334-341.
10. Cella, M., Dymond, S., Cooper, A., & Turnbull, O. (2007). Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 64, 164-169.
11. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Clark, L., Manes, F., Antoun, N., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1474-1483.
13. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 351, 1413-1420.
14. De Neys, W. (2006a). Automatic-heuristic and executive analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1070-1100.
15. De Neys, W. (2006b). Dual processes in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428-433.
16. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
17. Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239-271.
18. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 451-458.
19. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
20. Evans, C. E., Kemish, K., & Turnbull, O. H. (2004). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 240-244.
21. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.
22. Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2003). Ventromedial frontal cortex mediates affective shifting in humans: Evidence from a reversal learning paradigm. Brain, 126, 1830-1837.
23. Fernie, G., & Tunney, R. J. (2006). Some decks are better than others: The effect of reinforcer type and task instructions on learning in the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 60, 94-102.
24. Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-211). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
25. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
26. Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought (pp. 167-184). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., Wetherick, N. E., & Wynn, V. (1993). Working memory and strategies in syllogistic reasoning tasks. Memory and Cognition, 21, 115-124.
28. Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., & Wynn, V. (2002). Syllogistic reasoning tasks and working memory: Evidence from sequential presentation of premises. Current Psychological Research, 21, 111-120.
29. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive Behavioural and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 341-353.
31. Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., Holben, H., & Wirick, A. K. (2006). Affective biasing of choices in gambling task decision making. Cognitive Behavioural and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 190-200.
32. Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265-315.
33. Jameson, T. L., Hinson, J. M., & Whitney, P. (2004). Components of working memory and somatic markers in decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 515-520.
34. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93, 1449-1475.
36. Kerr, A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2004). Development of "hot" executive function: The children's gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 55, 148-157.
37. Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy for Science USA, 101, 16075-16080.
38. Manes, F., Sahakian, B. J., Clark, L., Rogers, R., Antoun, N., Aitken, M., et al. (2002). Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. Brain, 125, 624-639.
39. Mellers, B. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910-924.
40. Northoff, G., Grimm, S., Boeker, H., Schmidt, C., Bermpohl, F., Heinzel, A., et al. (2006). Affective judgment and beneficial decision making: Ventromedial prefrontal activity correlates with performance in the Iowa gambling task. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 572-587.
41. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Optimal data selection: Revision, review, and reevaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 289-318.
42. Overman, W. H., Frassrand, K., Ansel, S., Trawalter, S., Bies, B., & Redmond, A. (2004). Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1838-1851.
43. Oya, H., Adolphs, R., Kawasaki, H., Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of reward prediction error recorded in the human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 8351-8356.
44. Reverberi, C., Rusconi, P., Paulesu, E., & Cherubini, P. (2009). Response demands and the recruitment of heuristic strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester), 62, 513-530.
45. Sanfey, A. G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 108-116.
46. Sloman, S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
47. Sloman, S. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought (pp. 379-396). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought (pp. 397-420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
50. Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Denburg, N. L. (2002). Asymmetric functional roles of right and left ventromedial prefrontal cortices in social conduct, decision-making, and emotional processing. Cortex, 38(4), 589-612.
51. Turnbull, O. H., Evans, C. Y., Bunce, A., Carzolio, B., & O'Connor, J. (2005). Emotion based learning and central executive resources: An investigation of intuition and the Iowa gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 57, 244-247.
52. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Wason, P. C., & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141-154.
54. Windmann, S., Kirsch, P., Mier, D., Stark, R., Walter, B., Gunturkun, O., et al. (2006). On framing effects in decision making: Linking lateral versus medial orbitofrontal cortex activation to choice outcome processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1198-1211.