Natural populations of lactic acid bacteria associated with silage fermentation as determined by phenotype, 16S ribosomal RNA and recA gene analysis

Systematic and Applied Microbiology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 235-241

  Pang, Huili ^a,b   Qin, Guangyong ^b   Tan, Zhongfang ^b   Li, Zongwei ^b   Wang, Yanping ^b   Cai, Yimin ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LIVESTOCK AND GRASSLAND SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

16S rRNA gene; Lactic acid bacteria; RecA gene; Silage fermentation

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; AMMONIA; CATALASE; LACTIC ACID; NITROGEN; RNA 16S;

ALFALFA; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRYING; FERMENTATION; FOOD; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; LACTIC ACID BACTERIUM; LACTOBACILLUS PARAPLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; LEUCONOSTOC; LEUCONOSTOC CITREUM; LEUCONOSTOC PSEUDOMESENTEROIDES; LEUKONOSTOC LACTIS; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PH MEASUREMENT; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECA GENE; RICE; SILAGE; SORGHUM; WEISSELLA; WEISSELLA CIBARIA; WEISSELLA CONFUSA;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; BILE ACIDS AND SALTS; BIODIVERSITY; FERMENTATION; GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; LACTIC ACID; LACTOBACILLALES; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORYZA SATIVA; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REC A RECOMBINASES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SILAGE; SORGHUM; ZEA MAYS;

LACTOBACILLUS PARAPLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS SUBSP. LACTIS; LEUCONOSTOC CITREUM; LEUCONOSTOC LACTIS; LEUCONOSTOC PSEUDOMESENTEROIDES; MEDICAGO SATIVA; ORYZA SATIVA; POSIBACTERIA; SORGHUM BICOLOR; WEISSELLA CIBARIA; WEISSELLA CONFUSA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79954610182     PISSN: 07232020     EISSN: 16180984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 1990, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA. 15th ed.
2. Ávila C.L.S., Valeriano A.R., Pinto J.C., Figueiredo A.V.R., Schwan R.F. Chemical and microbiological characteristics of sugar cane silages treated with microbial inoculants. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39:25-32.
3. Cai Y. Identification and characterization of Enterococcus species isolated from forage crops and their influence on silage fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:2466-2471.
4. Cai Y., Kumai S., Ogawa M., Benno Y., Nakase T. Characterization and identification of Pediococcus species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:2901-2906.
5. Cai Y., Ohmomo S., Ogawa M., Kumai S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:520-526.
6. Cai Y., Benno Y., Ogawa M., Ohmomo S., Kumai S., Nakase K. Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64:2982-2987.
7. Eisen J.A. The RecA protein as a model molecule for the molecular systematic studies of bacteria: comparison of trees of RecAs and 16S RNA from the same species. J. Mol. Evol. 1995, 41:1105-1123.
8. Eitan B.D., Shapiro O.H., Siboni N., Kushmaro A. Advantage of using inosine at the 3' termini of 16S rRNA gene universal primers for the study of microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:6902-6906.
9. Ennahar S., Cai Y., Fujita Y. Phylogenetic diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated with paddy rice silage as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:444-451.
10. Goering H.K., Van Soest P.J. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagent, Procedures, and Some Application) 1970, ARS-USDA, Washington, DC, Agric. Handbook No. 379.
11. Hammes W.P., Vogel R.F. The genus Lactobacillus. The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria 1995, vol. 2:19-54. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK. B.J.B. Wood, W.H. Holzapfel (Eds.).
12. Kim W.S., Ren J., Dunn N.W. Differentiation of Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis and subspecies cremoris strains by their adaptive response to stresses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 171:57-65.
13. Kimura M., Ohta T. On the stochastic model for estimation of mutation distance between homologous proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 1972, 2:87-90.
14. Kozaki M., Uchimura T., Okada S. Experimental Manual for Lactic Acid Bacteria 1992, Asakurasyoten, Tokyo, Japan.
15. Lloyd A.T., Sharp P.M. Evolution of the recA gene and the molecular phylogeny of bacteria. J. Mol. Evol. 1993, 37:399-407.
16. McDonald P., Henderson N., Heron S. The Biochemistry of Silage 1991, Chalcombe Publ., Marlow, UK. 2nd ed.
17. Morimoto H. Experimental Method of Animal Nutrition 1971, Youkendo, Tokyo, Japan.
18. Nomura M., Kimoto H., Someya Y., Suzuki I. Novel characteristic for distinguishing Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis from subsp. cremoris. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999, 49:163-166.
19. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
20. Torriani S., Felis G.E., Dellaglio F. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67:3450-3454.