Limitations of the MRL mouse as a model for cardiac regeneration

Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 648-656

  Moseley, Fleur L ^a,c   Faircloth, Matthew E ^b   Lockwood, Wendy ^a   Marber, Michael S ^b   Bicknell, Katrina A ^a   Valasek, Petr ^a   Brooks, Gavin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Innovex Medical Communications   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cell cycle; heart; MRL mouse; myocardial infarction; stem cell

Indexed keywords

ATAXIN 1; CD4 ANTIGEN; CYCLIN A; CYCLIN B1; CYCLIN D1; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 2; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 4; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 6; CYCLIN E; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PROTEIN P21; PROTEIN P27; STEM CELL FACTOR RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR E2F5;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CARDIAC REGENERATION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL POPULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY LIGATION; FETUS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE FIBROSIS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; LIVER CELL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOUSE; MURPHY ROTHS LARGE LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SHAM PROCEDURE; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES; CYCLINS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HEART; LIVER; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; REGENERATION; STEM CELLS;

EID: 79954572849     PISSN: 00223573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01261.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anversa P, et al,. Myocardial aging-a stem cell problem. Basic Res Cardiol 2005; 100: 482-493. (Pubitemid 41662428)
2. Beltrami AP, et al,. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1750-1757. (Pubitemid 32497029)
3. Nadal-Ginard B,. Commitment, fusion and biochemical differentiation of a myogenic cell line in the absence of DNA synthesis. Cell 1978; 15: 855-864.
4. Hristov M, Weber C,. The therapeutic potential of progenitor cells in ischemic heart disease-past, present and future. Basic Res Cardiol 2006; 101: 1-7. (Pubitemid 43323426)
5. Huttmann A, et al,. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced blood stem cell mobilisation in patients with chronic heart failure-feasibility, safety and effects on exercise tolerance and cardiac function. Basic Res Cardiol 2006; 101: 78-86. (Pubitemid 43323435)
6. Lyngbaek S, et al,. Cardiac regeneration by resident stem and progenitor cells in the adult heart. Basic Res Cardiol 2007; 102: 101-114. (Pubitemid 46193950)
7. Melo LG, et al,. Gene and cell-based therapies for heart disease. FASEB J 2004; 18: 648-663. (Pubitemid 38451787)
8. Brockes JP, Kumar A,. Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3: 566-574.
9. Brockes JP, et al,. Regeneration as an evolutionary variable. J Anat 2001; 199: 3-11. (Pubitemid 32785373)
10. Lepilina A, et al,. A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell 2006; 127: 607-619. (Pubitemid 44647426)
11. Poss KD, et al,. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 2002; 298: 2188-2190. (Pubitemid 35471243)
12. Metcalfe AD, et al,. Characterizing regeneration in the vertebrate ear. J Anat 2006; 209: 439-446.
13. Clark LD, et al,. A new murine model for mammalian wound repair and regeneration. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1998; 88: 35-45. (Pubitemid 28360931)
14. McBrearty BA, et al,. Genetic analysis of a mammalian wound-healing trait. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 11792-11797.
15. Naseem RH, et al,. Reparative myocardial mechanisms in adult C57BL/6 and MRL mice following injury. Physiol Genomics 2007; 30: 44-52. (Pubitemid 47173288)
16. Leferovich JM, et al,. Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 9830-9835. (Pubitemid 32769389)
17. Bedelbaeva K, et al,. The MRL mouse heart healing response shows donor dominance in allogeneic foetal liver chimeric mice. Cloning Stem Cells 2004; 6: 352-363. (Pubitemid 40023489)
18. Leferovich JM, Heber-Katz E,. The scarless heart. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2002; 13: 327-333. (Pubitemid 35300809)
19. Grisel P, et al,. The MRL mouse repairs both cryogenic and ischemic myocardial infarcts with scar. Cardiovasc Pathol 2008; 17: 14-22.
20. Oh YS, et al,. Scar formation after ischemic myocardial injury in MRL mice. Cardiovasc Pathol 2004; 13: 203-206.
21. Abdullah I, et al,. MRL mice fail to heal the heart in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Wound Repair Regen 2005; 13: 205-208. (Pubitemid 40489871)
22. Fisher SG, Marber MS,. An in vivo model of ischaemia-reperfusion injury and ischaemic preconditioning in the mouse heart. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2002; 48: 161-169. (Pubitemid 38373498)
23. Vara D, et al,. Inhibition of E2F abrogates the development of cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 21388-21394. (Pubitemid 36792534)
24. Werneck-de-Castro JP, et al,. G-CSF does not improve systolic function in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 2006; 101: 494-501.
25. Clark JE, et al,. Post-infarction remodeling is independent of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 (MKK3). Cardiovasc Res 2007; 74: 466-470. (Pubitemid 46693711)
26. Brooks G, et al,. Expression and activities of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases in developing rat ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997; 29: 2261-2271. (Pubitemid 27348535)
27. Poolman RA, Brooks G,. Expressions and activities of cell cycle regulatory molecules during the transition from myocyte hyperplasia to hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998; 30: 2121-2135. (Pubitemid 28495337)
28. Sharova LV, et al,. Global gene expression profiling reveals similarities and differences among mouse pluripotent stem cells of different origins and strains. Dev Biol 2007; 307: 446-459. (Pubitemid 47001365)
29. Ieda M, et al,. Cardiac fibroblasts regulate myocardial proliferation through beta1 integrin signaling. Dev Cell 2009; 16: 233-244.
30. Gerdes J, et al,. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int J Cancer 1983; 31: 13-20. (Pubitemid 13179545)
31. Robey TE, Murry CE,. Absence of regeneration in the MRL/MpJ mouse heart following infarction or cryoinjury. Cardiovasc Pathol 2008; 17: 6-13. (Pubitemid 350298446)
32. Cimini M, et al,. The MRL mouse heart does not recover ventricular function after a myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Pathol 2008; 17: 32-39. (Pubitemid 350298450)
33. Rajnoch C, et al,. Regeneration of the ear after wounding in different mouse strains is dependent on the severity of wound trauma. Dev Dyn 2003; 226: 388-397. (Pubitemid 36158183)
34. Chadwick RB, et al,. Digit tip regrowth and differential gene expression in MRL/Mpj, DBA/2, and C57BL/6 mice. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15: 275-284. (Pubitemid 46376390)
35. Ueno M, et al,. Accelerated wound healing of alkali-burned corneas in MRL mice is associated with a reduced inflammatory signature. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4097-4106. (Pubitemid 44264610)
36. Beare AH, et al,. Location of injury influences the mechanisms of both regeneration and repair within the MRL/MpJ mouse. J Anat 2006; 209: 547-559. (Pubitemid 44473322)
37. Colwell AS, et al,. Skin wounds in the MRL/MPJ mouse heal with scar. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 81-90.
38. Hampton DW, et al,. Altered CNS response to injury in the MRL/MpJ mouse. Neuroscience 2004; 127: 821-832. (Pubitemid 39099548)