Center-surround visual motion processing in migraine

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 6070-6076

  Battista, Josephine ^a   Badcock, David R ^b   McKendrick, Allison M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIGRAINE; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; MOTION; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; MOTION PERCEPTION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79954561689     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5290     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Stewart WF, Shechter A, Rasmussen BK. Migraine prevalence: a review of population based studies. Neurology. 1994;44(suppl 4): S17-S23.
2. Antal A, Temme J, Nitsche MA, et al. Altered motion perception in migraineurs: evidence for interictal cortical hyperexcitability. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:788-794.
3. Ditchfield JA, McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Processing of global form and motion in migraineurs. Vision Res. 2006;46:141-148.
4. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Motion processing deficits in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:363-372.
5. McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ, Badcock DR, Heywood JT. Visual dysfunction between migraine events. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:626-633.
6. Shepherd AJ. Local and global motion after-effects are both enhanced in migraine, and the underlying mechanisms differ across cortical areas. Brain. 2006;129:1833-1843.
7. Battelli L, Black KR, Wray SH. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:1066-1069.
8. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs with or without aura. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:442-448.
9. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Gurgone M. Vernier acuity is normal in migraine, whereas global form and global motion perception are not. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3213-3219.
10. Palmer JE, Chronicle EP, Rolan P, Mulleners WM. Cortical hyperexcitability is cortical under-inhibition: evidence from a novel functional test of migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:525-532.
11. Shepherd AJ. Increased visual after-effects following pattern adaptation in migraine: a lack of intracortical excitation? Brain. 2001; 124:2310-2318.
12. Aurora SK, Wilkinson F. The brain is hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:1442-1453.
13. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J. Is the cerebral cortex hyperexcitable or hyperresponsive in migraine? Cephalalgia. 2007;27: 1427-1439.
14. Brighina F, Palermo A, Fierro B. Cortical inhibition and habituation to evoked potentials: relevance for pathophysiology of migraine. J Headache Pain. 2009;10:77-84.
15. Chadaide Z, Arlt S, Antal A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation reveals inhibitory deficiency in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:833-839.
16. Aurora SK, Barrodale P, Chronicle EP, Mulleners WM. Cortical inhibition is reduced in chronic and episodic migraine and demonstrates a spectrum of illness. Headache. 2005;45:546-552.
17. Betts LR, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ. Aging reduces centersurround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron. 2005; 45:361-366.
18. Dakin S, Carlin P, Hemsley D. Weak suppression of visual context in chronic schizophrenia. Curr Biol. 2005;15:R822-R824.
19. Karas R, McKendrick AM. Aging alters surround modulation of perceived contrast. J Vis. 2009;9:1-9.
20. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Gilroy LA, Blake R. Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature. 2003;424:312-315.
21. Tadin D, Lappin JS. Optimal size for perceiving motion decreases with contrast. Vision Res. 2005;45:2059-2064.
22. Carpenter RH, Reddi BA, Anderson AJ. A simple two-stage model predicts response time distributions. J Physiol. 2009;587:4051-4062.
23. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature. 2000;404:390-394.
24. Roitman JD, Shadlen MN. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J Neurosci. 2002;22:9475-9489.
25. Pack CC, Hunter JN, Born RT. Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:1809-1815.
26. Leventhal AG, Wang Y, Pu M, Zhou Y, Ma Y. GABA and its agonists improved visual cortical function in senescent monkeys. Science. 2003;300:812-815.
27. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Blake R. Fine temporal properties of centersurround interactions in motion revealed by reverse correlation. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2614-2622.
28. Golomb JD, McDavitt JR, Ruf BM, et al. Enhanced visual motion perception in major depressive disorder. J Neurosci. 2009;29: 9072-9077.
29. The International Headache Society. The International classification of headache disorders. 2nd ed. Cephalalgia. 2004;1(suppl): 1-160.
30. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, Edmeads JG. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2001;41:854-861.
31. Marcus DA, Soso MJ. Migraine and stripe-induced visual discomfort. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:1129-1132.
32. Levinson E, Sekuler R. The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. J Physiol. 1975;250: 347-366.
33. Chen Y, Nakayama K, Levy D, Matthysse S, Hozman P. Processing of global, but not local, motion direction is deficient in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2003;61:215-227.
34. Bennett PJ, Sekuler R, Sekuler AB. The effects of aging on motion detection and motion identification. Vision Res. 2007;47:799-809.
35. Aurora SK, Ahmad BK, Welch KM, Bhardhwaj P, Ramadan NM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital cortex in migraine. Neurology. 1998;50:1111-1114.
36. Cutrer FM, O'Donnell A, Sanchez del Rio M. Functional neuroimaging: enhanced understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Neurology. 2000;55:S36-S45.
37. van den Maagdenberg AM, Pietrobon D, Pizzorusso T, et al. A Cacna1a knockin migraine mouse model with increased susceptibility to cortical spreading depression. Neuron. 2004;41:701-710.
38. Angelucci A, Bressloff PC. Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. Prog Brain Research. 2006;154:93-120.
39. Huang X, Albright TD, Stoner GR. Stimulus-dependency and mechanisms of surround modulation in cortical area MT. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13889-13906.
40. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Badcock JC, Gurgone M. Motion perception in migraineurs: abnormalities are not related to attention. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:1131-1136.
41. Wilkins A, Nimmo-Smith I, Tait A, et al. A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain. 1984;107:989-1017.
42. Barnes GR. Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements. Brain Cogn. 2008;68:309-326.
43. Wilkinson F, Karanovic O, Ross EC, Lillakas L, Steinbach MJ. Ocular motor measures in migraine with and without aura. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:660-671.
44. Wilkinson F, Crotogino J. Orientation discrimination thresholds in migraine: a measure of visual cortical inhibition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:57-66.
45. McColl SL, Wilkinson F. Visual contrast gain control in migraine: measures of visual cortical excitability and inhibition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:74-84.