Vernier acuity is normal in migraine, whereas global form and global motion perception are not

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 3213-3219

  McKendrick, Allison M ^a,b   Badcock, David R ^a   Gurgone, Melissa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIGRAINE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; ADOLESCENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 33746734400     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1549     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Antal A, Temme J, Nitsche MA, Varga ET, Lang N, Paulus W. Altered motion perception in migraineurs: evidence for interictal cortical hyperexcitability. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:788-794.
2. Ditchfield JA, McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Processing of global form and motion in migraineurs. Vision Res. 2006;46:141-148.
3. McColl SL, Wilkinson F. Visual contrast gain control in migraine: measures of visual cortical excitability and inhibition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:74-84.
4. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Motion processing deficits in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:363-372.
5. McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ, Badcock DR, Heywood JT. Visual dysfunction between migraine events. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:626-633.
6. Palmer JE, Chronicle EP, Rolan P, Mulleners WM. Cortical hyperexcitability is cortical under-inhibition: evidence from a novel functional test of migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:525-532.
7. Shepherd AJ. Increased visual after-effects following pattern adaptation in migraine: a lack of intracortical excitation? Brain. 2001;124:2310-2318.
8. Wilkinson F, Crotogino J. Orientation discrimination thresholds in migraine: a measure of visual cortical inhibition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:57-66.
9. Wray SH, Mijovic-Prelec D, Kosslyn SM. Visual processing in migraineurs. Brain. 1995;118:25-35.
10. Gallant JL, Shoup RE, Mazer JA. A human extrastriate area functionally homologous to macaque V4. Neuron. 2000;27:227-235.
11. Newsome WT, Britten KH, Movshon JA. Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature. 1989;341:52-54.
12. Pack CC, Berezovskii VK, Born RT. Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys. Nature. 2001;414:905-908.
13. Wilkinson F, James TW, Wilson HR, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Curr Biol. 2000;16:1455-1458.
14. Koyama S, Sasaki Y, Andersen GJ, Tootell RBH, Matsuura M, Watanabe T. Separate processing of different global-motion structures in visual cortex is measured by fMRI. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2027-2032.
15. Batelli L, Black KR, Wray SH. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:1066-1069.
16. Fierro B, Ricci R, Piazza A, et al. 1 Hz rTMS enhances extrastriate cortex activity in migraine: evidence of a reduced inhibition? Neurology. 2003;61:1446-1448.
17. Grusser O. Migraine phosphenes and the retino-cortical magnification factor. Vision Res. 1995;35:1125-1134.
18. Cao Y, Welch KMA, Aurora S, Vikingstad EM. Functional MRI-BOLD of visually triggered headache in patients with migraine. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:548-554.
19. Davies PTG, Steiner TJ. rCBF in acute migraine: high resolution SPECT with HmPAO shows primary visual cortical disturbance not parieto-occipital watershed (Abstract). Proceedings of the 6th International Headache Congress, Paris, France, August 26-29, 1993. Cephalalgia. 1993;13(suppl 13):17.
20. Lauritzen M, Skyhoj Olsen T, Lassen NA, Paulson OB. Regulation of regional cerebral blood flow during and between migraine attacks. Ann Neurol. 1983;14:569-572.
21. Lauritzen M, Skyhoj Olsen T, Lassen NA, Paulson OB. Changes in regional cerebral blood flow during the course of classic migraine attacks. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:633-641.
22. Palmer JE, Chronicle EP. Cognitive processing in migraine: a failure to find facilitation in patients with aura. Cephalalgia. 1998;18:125-132.
23. Barlow HB. Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and the visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981;212:1-34.
24. Wilson HR. Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain positional hyperexcitability. Vision Res. 1986;26:453-469.
25. Banton T, Levi DM. Spatial localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined contours. Vision Res. 1993;33:2225-2237.
26. Regan D. Form from motion parallax and form from luminance contrast: vernier discrimination. Spatial Vision. 1986;1:305-318.
27. Glass L. The Moire effect from random dots. Nature. 1969;223:578-580.
28. International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(suppl 1):160.
29. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, Edmeads JG. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2001;41:854-861.
30. Wetherill G, Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1965;18:1-10.
31. Wilson HR, Wilkinson F. Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: implications for form vision. Vision Res. 1998;38:2933-2947.
32. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Morgan WH. The detection of both global motion and global form is disrupted in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3693-3701.
33. Lewis TL, Ellemberg D, Maurer D, Dirks M, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR. A window on the normal development of sensitivity to global form in Glass patterns. Perception. 2004;33:409-418.
34. Hess RF, Hayes A. Neural recruitment explains "Weber's Law" of spatial position. Vision Res. 1993;33:1673-1684.
35. McColl SL, Wilkinson F. Migraineurs show visual field defects on motion coherence perimetry during the inter-ictal period (Abstract). 10th Congress of the International Headache Society, New York, NY, June 2001. Cephalalgia. 2001;21(suppl 4):391.
36. Schoenen J. Cortical electrophysiology in migraine and possible pathogenic implications. Clin Neurosci. 1998;5:10-17.
37. Schoenen J, Ambrosini A, Sandor P, De Noordhout A. Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:955-972.
38. Fumal A, Bohotin V, Vandenheede M, Schoenen J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: a review of the facts and controversies. Acta Neurol Belg. 2003;103:144-154.
39. Edwards M, Badcock DR. Global motion perception: interaction of on and off pathways. Vision Res. 1994;34:2849-2858.
40. Badcock DR, Clifford CWG, Khuu SK. Interactions between luminance and contrast signals in global form detection. Vision Res. 2005;45:881-889.
41. Lang E, Kaltenhauser M, Neundorfer B, Seidler S. Hyperexcitability of the primary somatosensory cortex in migraine: a magnetoencephalograhic study. Brain. 2004;127:2459-2469.
42. Ambrossini A, De Noordhout A, Sandor P, Schoenen J. Electrophysiological studies in migraine: a comprehensive review of their interest and limitations. Cephalalgia. 2003;23(suppl):13-31.
43. Kropp P, Gerber WD. Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine dur to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation? Cephalalgia. 1993;13:37-41.
44. Badcock DR, Wong TL. Resistance to positional noise in human vision. Nature. 1990;343:554-555.
45. Wilkins A, Nimmo-Smith I, Tait A, et al. A neurological basis for visual discomfort. Brain. 1984;107:989-1017.
46. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs both with and without aura. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:442-448.
47. Stuart GW, McAnally KI, Castles A. Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit? Vision Res. 2001;41:3205-3211.
48. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Badcock JC, Gurgone M. Motion perception in migraineurs: abnormalities are not related to attention. Cephalalgia. In press.
49. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. An analysis of the factors associated with visual field deficits measured with flickering stimuli in between migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:389-397.
50. Coleston DM, Chronicle E, Ruddock KH, Kennard C. Precortical dysfunction of spatial and temporal visual processing in migraine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:1208-1211.
51. Aurora SK, Cao Y, Bowyer SM, Welch KMA. The occipital cortex is hyperexcitable in migraine: evidence from TMS, fMRI, and MEG studies. Headache. 1999;39: 469-476.
52. Chronicle EP, Wilkins AJ, Coleston DM. Thresholds for detection of a target against a background grating suggest visual dysfunction in migraine with aura but not migraine without aura. Cephalalgia. 1995;15:117-122.