Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: A qualitative review

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 945-953

  Heilferty, Catherine Mcgeehin ^a  

^a HOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blogs; Ethical considerations; Illness narratives; Internet research; Literature review; Nursing; Qualitative review

Indexed keywords

CHILD; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PARENT; PRIVACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

BLOGGING; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; NARRATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PARENTS; PRIVACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;

EID: 79954528246     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05563.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Bakardjieva M. & Feenberg A. (2000) Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology 2, 233-240.
2. Bassett E. & O'Riordan K. (2002) Ethics of Internet research: contesting the human subjects model. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 233-247.
3. Beauchamp T. & Childress J. (2001) Principles of Bioethics. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Berry D. (2004) Internet research: privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach. Internet Research 14(4), 323-332.
5. Bruckman A. (2002a) Ethical Guidelines for Research Online. Retrieved from on 20 April 2008.
6. Bruckman A. (2002b) Studying the amateur artist: a perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 217-231.
7. Campbell A.V. (2003) The virtues (and vices) of the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 29, 292-296.
8. Elgesem D. (2002) What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology 4, 195-203.
9. Elm M. (2009) Question three: how do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative Internet research?. In Internet Inquiry (Markham A. & Baym N., eds), Sage, London, pp. 69-87.
10. Ess & the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical Decision Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Retrieved from on 18 March 2008.
11. Eysenbach G. & Till J. (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal 323, 1103-1105.
12. Grinyer A. (2007) The Ethics of Internet Usage in Health and Personal Narratives Research. Retrieved from on 18 March 2008.
13. Heilferty C.M. (2009) Toward a theory of online communication in illness: concept analysis of illness blogs. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(7), 1539-1547.
14. Himma K. & Tavani H. (Eds) (2008) The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ.
15. Im E. & Chee W. (2002) Issues in protection of human subjects in Internet research. Nursing Research 51(4), 266-269.
16. Kennedy E. (2008) Implementing ethically-sound research on online health-related support groups. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 6(4). Retrieved from on 3 December 2009.
17. Kralik D., Price K., Warren J. & Koch T. (2004) Issues in data generation using email group conversations for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(2), 213-220.
18. Markham A. (2008) The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (Denzin N. & Lincoln Y., eds), Sage Publications, London, pp. 247-284.
19. McNamara K.R. (2007) Blogging Breast Cancer: Language and Subjectivity in Women's Online Illness Narratives. Retrieved from on 27 June 2007.
20. Moreno M., Fost N. & Christakis D. (2008) Research ethics in the MySpace era. Pediatrics 121(1), 157-161.
21. Mount E. (1993) Can we talk? Contexts of meaning for interpreting illness. The Journal of Medical Humanities 14(2), 51-65.
22. Nosek B., Banaji M. & Greenwald A. (2002) E-research: ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58(1), 161-176.
23. Orgad S. (2004) Storytelling Online: Talking Breast Cancer on the Internet. Peter Lang, New York, NY.
24. Pitts V. (2004) Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health: Interdisciplinary Journal of Health, Illness and Medicine 8(1), 33-59.
25. Serfaty V. (2004) The Mirror and the Veil: An Overview of American Online Diaries and Blogs. Rodopi, New York.
26. Sharf B. (1999) Beyond netiquette: the ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (Jones S., ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 243-256.
27. Sixsmith J. & Murray C. (2001) Ethical issues in the documentary data analysis of internet posts and archives. Qualitative Health Research 11(3), 423-432.
28. Stern S. (2003) Encountering distressing information in online research: a consideration of legal and ethical responsibilities. New Media & Society 5(2), 249-266.
29. United States National Institutes of Health Office of Human Subjects Research (2010) Regulations and Ethical Guidelines. Retrieved from on 9 December 2009.
30. Watson M., Jones D. & Burns L. (2007) Internet research and informed consent: an ethical model for using archived emails. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 14(9), 396-403.
31. White M. (2002) Representations or people? Ethics and Information Technology 4, 249-266.
32. Whitehead L. (2007) Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: an integrated review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 65, 782-791.