Issues in protection of human subjects in internet research

Nursing Research

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 266-269

  Im, Eun Ok ^a   Chee, Wonshik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Milwaukee   (United States)

Author keywords

E mail; Human subjects; Informed consent; Internet; Issues; Protection; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; NEOPLASM; NURSING RESEARCH; PAIN; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; NEOPLASMS; NURSING RESEARCH; PAIN;

EID: 0036632625     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200207000-00007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Nurses Association (ANA). (2001). Human rights guidelines for nurses in clinical and other research. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses Association (ANA).
2. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human subjects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. American Sociological Association (1997). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
4. Baran, N. (1997). Privatizing cyberspace. New Internationalist, 228, 16-19.
5. rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Duffy, M. E. (1987). Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 79(3), 130-133.
7. Fawcett, J. F., & Buhle, E. L. (1995). Using the Internet for data collection. Computers in Nursing, 13, 273-279.
8. Frandsen, J. L. (1997). The use of computers in cancer pain management. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 13, 49-56.
9. Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. Retrieved July 1, 2001, from http://www.aaas.org/ spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf.
10. Im, E. O., & Chee. W. (2001). A feminist critique on the use of the Internet in nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(4), 67-82.
11. Katz, J. (1996). The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal [see comments]. JAMA, 276(20), 1662-1666.
12. Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.
13. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. A. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. In M. A. Smity & K. Peter (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
14. Lacroiz, E. M., Backus, J. E., & Lyon, B. J. (1994). Service providers and users discover the Internet. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 82, 412-418.
15. Lakeman, R. (1997). Using the Internet for data collection in nursing research. Computers in Nursing, 15, 269-275.
16. Mitchell, E. S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18-26.
17. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHEW Publication No. (05) 78-0012.
18. Nelson-Marten, P., & Rich, B. A. (1999). A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 15(2), 81-88.
19. O'Brien, J. (1999). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online interaction. In M. A. Smith & K. Peter (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. London & New York: Routledge.
20. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information-The HIPAA privacy rule. Retrieved September 24, 2001, from http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa.
21. World Medical Organization (1996a). The Nuremberg code. British Medical Journal, 313 (7070), 1448.
22. World Medical Organization (1996b). Declaration of Helsinki. British Medical Journal, 313 (7070), 1448-1449.