Quantification of magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals with lineshape estimation

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 183-192

  Osorio Garcia, M I ^a   Sima, D M ^a   Nielsen, F U ^a   Himmelreich, U ^a   Van Huffel, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Lineshape; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); Quantification; Shimming

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; METABOLITES;

CONDITION; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; INHOMOGENEITIES; LINES SHAPES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; METABOLITE CONCENTRATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; SHIMMING; SPECTRAL QUALITY; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS;

TISSUE;

EID: 79954480107     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1353     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Poullet J-B, Sima DM, Simonetti AW, De Neuter B, Vanhamme L, Lemmerling P, Van Huffel S. An automated quantitation of short echo time MRS spectra in an open source software environment: AQSES. NMR Biomed. 2007; 20(5): 493-504.
2. Poullet J-B, Sima DM, Van Huffel S. MRS signal quantitation: a review of time- and frequency-domain methods. J. Magn. Reson. 2008; 195(2): 134-144.
3. 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed. 2001; 14(4): 260-264.
4. 1H short echo-time signals: background accommodation. MAGMA 2004; 16(6): 284-296.
5. Blamire AM, Rothman DL, Nixon T. Dynamic shim updating: a new approach towards optimized whole brain shimmings. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996; 36(1): 159-165.
6. Gruetter R. Automatic localized in vivo adjustment of all first- and second- order shim coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993; 29(6): 804-811.
7. Juchem C, Muller-Bierl B, Schick F, Logothetis NK, Pfeuffer J. Combined passive and active shimming for in vivo MR spectroscopy at high magnetic fields. J. Magn. Reson. 2006; 183(2): 278-289.
8. Juchem C, Nixon TW, McIntyre S, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA. Magnetic field homogenization of the human prefrontal cortex with a set of localized electrical coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 63(1): 171-180.
9. Bartha R, Drost DJ, Menon RS, Williamson PC. Spectroscopic lineshape correction by QUECC: combined QUALITY deconvolution and eddy current correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44(4): 641-645.
10. Dong Z, Peterson BS. Spectral resolution amelioration by deconvolution (SPREAD) in MR spectroscopic imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009; 29(6): 1395-1405.
11. Klose U. In vivo proton spectroscopy in presence of eddy currents. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990; 14(1): 26-30.
12. Maudsley AA. Spectral lineshape determination by self-deconvolution. J. Magn. Reson. 1995; 106(1): 47-57.
13. Metz KR, Lam MM, Webb AG. Reference deconvolution: a simple and effective method for resolution enhancement in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Concepts Magn. Reson. 2000; 12(1): 21-42.
14. Popa E, Capobianco E, de Beer R, van Ormondt D, Graveron-Demilly D. In vivo quantitation of metabolites with an incomplete model function. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009; 20(10): 104032 (9 pp.).
15. Sima DM, Osorio-Garcia MI, Poullet J-B, Suvichakorn A, Antoine J-P, Van Huffel S, van Ormondt D. Lineshape estimation for MRS signals: self-deconvolution revisited. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009; 20(10): 104031 (12 pp.).
16. Slotboom J, Boesch C, Kreis R. Versatile frequency domain fitting using time domain models and prior knowledge. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39(6): 899-911.
17. Webb P, Spielman D, Macovski A. Inhomogeneity correction for in vivo spectroscopy by high-resolution water referencing. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 23(1): 1-11.
18. 1H NMR spectra with increased magnetic field strength. J. Magn. Reson. 1998; 135(1): 260-264.
19. 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a gallery of artifacts. NMR Biomed. 2004; 17(6): 361-381.
20. Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993; 30(6): 672-679.
21. Cudalbu C, Mlynarik V, Xin L, Gruetter R. Quantification of in vivo short echo-time proton magnetic resonance spectra at 14.1 T using two different approaches of modelling the macromolecule spectrum. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009; 20(10): 104034 (7 pp.).
22. 1H NMR spectroscopy of human brain. J. Magn. Reson. 1999; 140(1): 228-234.
23. Cobas JC, Bernstein MA, Martn-Pastor M, Garca Tahoces P. A new general-purpose fully automatic baseline-correction procedure for 1D and 2D NMR data. J. Magn. Reson. 2006; 183(1): 145-151.
24. Seeger U, Klose U, Mader I, Grodd W, Naegele T. Parameterized evaluation of macromolecules and lipids in proton MR spectroscopy of brain diseases. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003; 49(1): 19-28.
25. Bottomley PA. Selective volume method for performing localized NMR spectroscopy. In U.S. patent, (4 480 228), 1984.
26. 1H NMR spectroscopy of rat brain at 1ms echo time. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41(4): 649-656.
27. Laudadio T, Mastronardi N, Vanhamme L, Van Hecke P, Van Huffel S. Improved Lanczos algorithms for blackbox MRS data quantitation. J. Magn. Reson. 2002; 157(2): 292-297.
28. Stefan D, Di Cesare F, Andrasescu A, Popa E, Lazariev A, Vescovo E, Strbak O, Williams S, Starcuk Z, Cabanas M, van Ormondt D, Graveron-Demilly D. Quantitation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals: the jMRUI software package. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009; 20(10): 104035(9 pp.).
29. Smith SA, Levante TO, Meier BH, Ernst RR. Computer simulations in magnetic resonance. An object-oriented programming approach. J. Magn. Reson. 1994; 106(1): 75-105.
30. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1979; 74(368): 829-836.
31. 1H NMR spectra of the rat brain. J. Magn. Reson. 1999; 141(1): 104-120.
32. Lee JS, Cox DD. Robust smoothing: Smoothing parameter selection and applications to fluorescence spectroscopy. Comput. Stat. Data. An. 2009; 54(12): 3131-3143.