Determinants of success in treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 679-684

  Ghaem Maghami, S ^a   De Silva, D ^a   Tipples, M ^a   Lam, S J ^a   Perryman, K ^a   Soutter, W P ^a  

^a HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical neoplasia; post treatment disease; treatment depth; treatment failure rate; treatment margins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEEDLE EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79954458226     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02770.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, Soutter WP,. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: A meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 985-93. (Pubitemid 47629886)
2. Denny L, Kuhn L, De SM, Pollack AE, Dupree W, Wright TC Jr,. Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 294: 2173-81. (Pubitemid 41571134)
3. Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Esmy PO, Fayette JM, Shanthakumary S, Frappart L, et al. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of 'see and treat' with cryotherapy by nurses in a cervical screening study in India. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 738-43. (Pubitemid 46376636)
4. Soutter WP, Sasieni P, Panoskaltsis T,. Long-term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 2006; 118: 2048-55.
5. Soutter WP, Abernethy FM, Brown VA, Hill AS,. Success, complications and subsequent pregnancy outcome relative to the depth of laser treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Colposc Gynecol Laser Surg 1986; 2: 35-42. (Pubitemid 16158077)
6. Zaitoun AM, McKee G, Coppen MJ, Thomas SM, Wilson PO,. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. J Clin Pathol 2000; 53: 191-6. (Pubitemid 30163601)
7. Mitchell H, Hocking J,. Influences on the risk of recurrent high grade cervical abnormality. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002; 12: 728-34. (Pubitemid 35388041)
8. Orbo A, Arnesen T, Arnes M, Straume B,. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93: 479-83. (Pubitemid 38507622)
9. Costa S, De Nuzzo M, Infante FE, Bonavita B, Marinelli M, Rubino A, et al. Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 85: 119-24. (Pubitemid 34304020)
10. Santos C, Galdos R, Alvarez M, Velarde C, Barriga O, Dyer R, et al. One-session management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a solution for developing countries. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 61: 11-5.
11. Skjeldestad FE, Hagen B, Lie AK, Isaksen C,. Residual and recurrent disease after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 428-33. (Pubitemid 27357937)
12. Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, Novotny DB,. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement. Mod Pathol 1999; 12: 233-8. (Pubitemid 29133843)
13. Johnson N, Khalili M, Hirschowitz L, Ralli F, Porter R,. Predicting residual disease after excision of cervical dysplasia. BJOG 2003; 110: 952-5. (Pubitemid 37204953)
14. Flannelly G, Bolger B, Fawzi H, De Lopes AB, Monaghan JM,. Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence? BJOG 2001; 108: 1025-30. (Pubitemid 32971734)
15. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. Br Med J 2008; 337: a1284.
16. Partington CK, Turner MJ, Soutter WP, Griffiths M, Krausz T,. Laser vaporization versus laser excision conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 775-9. (Pubitemid 19116898)
17. Panoskaltsis T, Ind TEJ, Perryman K, Dina R, Abrahams Y, Soutter WP,. Needle versus loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2004; 111: 748-53. (Pubitemid 38869765)
18. Soutter WP, Haidopoulos D, Gornall RJ, McIndoe GA, Fox J, Mason WP, et al. Is conservative treatment for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix safe? BJOG 2001; 108: 1184-9. (Pubitemid 33052484)
19. Soutter WP,. Computerisation of a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 824-8.
20. Peto R, Peto J,. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser A 1972; 135: 185-207.
21. Cox DR,. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; 34: 187-220.
22. Hollander M, Wolfe DA,. Non-Parametric Statistical Methods, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 1999.
23. Manchanda R, Baldwin P, Crawford R, Vowler SL, Moseley R, Latimer J, et al. Effect of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence following LLETZ in women over 50 years. BJOG 2008; 115: 1238-42.