Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: A retrospective long-term follow-up material

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 479-483

  Orbo A ^a   Arnesen, T ^a   Arnes, M ^a   Straume, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

CIN; Prognosis; Resection margin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MARKER; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LASER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NORWAY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 1942540688     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lisfranc J. Memoire sur l'amputation du col l'uterus. Gas Med. Paris. 2:1834;385.
2. Ahlgren M., Ingermarsson I., Lindberg L.G., Nordquist S.R.B. Conization as treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 46:1975;135-140.
3. Bjerre B., Eliasson G., Linell F., Søderberg H., Sjøberg N.O. Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 15:1976;143-152.
4. Yarnoz M.C., Cortes J., Llompart M., Torrecabota J., Rossello J.J., Amengual E. The colposcopy and the biopsy in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of 81 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 9:1988;345-349.
5. Reich O., Pickel H., Lahousen M., Tamussino K., Winter R. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins. Obstet. Gynecol. 97:2001;428-430.
6. White C.D., Cooper W.L., Williams R.R. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia extending to the margins of resection in conisation of the cervix. J. Reprod. Med. 36(9):1991;635-638.
7. Lapaquette T.K., Dinh T.V., Hannigan E.V., Doherthy M.G., Yandell R.B., Buchanan V.S. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conisation. Obstet. Gynecol. 82(3):1993;440-443.
8. Schiffer M.A., Greene H.J., Pomerance W., Moltz A. Cervical conization for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma in situ. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 93:1965;889-895.
9. Husseinzadeh N., Shbaro I., Wesseler T. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 33:1989;198-200.
10. Murta F.C., Resende A.V., Souza M.A.H., Adad S.J., Salum R. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 263:1999;42-44.
11. Abdul-Karin F.W., Nunez C. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: a study of 522 consecutive cervical cones. Obstet. Gynecol. 65:1985;77-81.
12. Paterson-Brown S., Chapatte O.A., Clark S.K., Wright A., Maxwell P., Taub N.A.et al. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol. Oncol. 46:1992;182-185.
13. Kolstad P., Klem V. Long-term follow up of 1121 cases of carcinoma in situ. Obstet. Gynecol. 48:1976;125-129.
14. Gardeil F., Barry-Walsh C., Prendiville W., Clinch J., Turner M. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet. Gynecol. 89:1997;419-422.
15. Mohamed-Noor K., Quinn M.A., Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cases. Gynecol. Oncol. 67:1997;34-38.
16. Murdoch J.B., Morgan P.R., Lopes A., Monaghan J.M. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow-up not treatment. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 99:1992;990-993.
17. Reich O., Lahousen M., Pickel H., Tamussino K., Winter R. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conisation with involved margins. Obstet. Gynecol. 99:2002;193-196.
18. Andersen E.S., Pedersen B., Nielsen K. Laser conization: the result of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol. Oncol. 54:1994;201-204.
19. Moore B.C., Higgins R.V., Laurent S.L., Marroum M.C., Bellitt P. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173:1995;361-366.
20. Mathevet P., Chemali E., Roy M., Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 106:2003;214-218.
21. Schulman H., Cavanagh D. Intraepithelial lesion of the cervix: the predictability of residual carcinoma in the uterus from microscopic study of the margins of the cone biopsy specimen. Cancer. 14:1961;795-800.
22. Christopherson W.M., Gray L.A. Dysplasia and preclinical carcinoma of the uterine cervix: diagnosis and management. Semin. Oncol. 9:1982;265-279.
23. Burd E.M. Human papilloma virus and cervical cancer. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16:2003;1-17.
24. Demopoulos R.I., Horowitz L.R., Vamvakas E.C. Endocervical gland involvement by cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III - Predictive value for residual and/or recurrent disease. Cancer. 68:1991;1932-1936.
25. Kruse A.-J., Baak J.P.A., de Bruin P.C., Jiwa M., Snijders W.P., Boodt J.P.et al. The Ki-67 immunoquantitation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a sensitive marker for grading. J. Pathol. 193:2001;48-54.
26. Chang C.L., Wang S.Y., Wu C.C., Su T.H., Wang K.L., Chen H.S.et al. Microsatellite alterations in exfoliated cervical epithelia deoxyribonucleic acid as a marker for high-grade dysplasia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 185:2001;108-115.
27. Hofvind S.S.-H., Nygård J.F., Olsen A.O., Sauer T., Skare G.B., Skjeldestad F.E. Mass-investigation for cervical cancer in Norway. Evaluation of the program 1992-98 Institute of population based cancer research. 2000;1-72. [Report number 1].