|
Volumn 108, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 1025-1030
|
Follow up after LLETZ: Could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGE;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CYTOLOGY;
DISEASE ASSOCIATION;
DYSKARYOSIS;
EXCISION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HIGH RISK POPULATION;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RECURRENCE RISK;
RISK FACTOR;
SMEAR;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SURVIVAL;
TIME;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
CLINICAL PROTOCOLS;
COLPOSCOPY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
VAGINAL SMEARS;
|
EID: 0034798474
PISSN: 03065456
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00240-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (92)
|
References (17)
|