Promoting creativity in the computer science design studio

SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 649-654

  Cennamo, Katherine ^a   Douglas, Sarah A ^b   Vernon, Mitzi ^a   Brandt, Carol ^a   Scott, Brigitte ^a   Reimer, Yolanda ^c   McGrath, Margarita ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer science education research; Creativity; Design; Studio

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH; CREATIVITY; DESIGN STUDIOS; ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY; HUMAN-COMPUTER; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; SOFTWARE SOLUTION;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; EDUCATION COMPUTING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DESIGN; STUDENTS; STUDIOS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 79954448460     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1953163.1953344     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Brooks, F.P. 2010. The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
2. Combs, L. B., Cennamo, K. S. & Newbill, P. L. 2009. Developing critical and creative thinkers: Toward a conceptual model of creative and critical thinking processes. Educ. Technol., 49, 5 (September-October. 2009), 3-14.
3. Dannels, D. P. 2005. Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of "crits" in design studios. Commun. Educ., 54, 2, 136-160. (Pubitemid 43392648)
4. Docherty, M., Sutton, P., Brereton, M. & Kaplan, S. 2001. An innovative design and studio-based CS degree. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 33(1), 233-237. (Pubitemid 32499193)
5. Guilford, J.P., Christensen, P.R., Merrifield, P.R., & Wilson, R.C. 1978. Alternate Uses: Manual of instructions and interpretations. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
7. Hendrix, D., Myneni, L., Narayanan, H., and Ross, M. (2010). Implementing studio-based learning in CS2. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2010), March 10-13, 2010, Milwaukee, WI.
8. Hundhausen, C.D., Narayanan, N. H., & Crosby, M. E. (2008). Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM Press, 392-396.
9. LeCompte, M. D. 2000. Analyzing qualitative data. Theor. Pract., 49, 3, 146-154.
10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. National Science Foundation 2006. Science of Design (SoD) Software-Intensive Systems, Program Solicitation. Retrieved November 13, 2006 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf07505/nsf07505.htm?org=CCF.
13. Raths, L. E., Wasserman, S., Jonas, A., & Rothstein, A. (1986). Teaching for thinking: Theory, strategies, & activities for the classroom. New York: Teachers College.
14. Reimer, Y. J. and Douglas, S.A. 2003. Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education Journal, 13, 3, 191-205.
15. Schon, D.A. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner. London: Jossey-Bass.
16. Shaffer, D. W. 2007. Learning in design. In R. A. Lesh, J. J. Kaput & E. Hamilton (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 99-126). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Simon, H. A. 1981. The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MS: MIT.
18. Starko, A. J. 2005. Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Torrance, E.P. 1974. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
21. Tufte, E. R. 2003. The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
22. Winograd, T. 1990. What can we teach about humancomputer interaction? Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 443-449. New York: ACM.