CodeWrite: Supporting student-driven practice of Java

SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 471-476

  Denny, Paul ^a   Luxton Reilly, Andrew ^a   Tempero, Ewan ^a   Hendrickx, Jacob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Assessment; CodeWrite; Constructive evaluation; Contributing student pedagogy; Online; Student generated content

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; CODEWRITE; CONSTRUCTIVE EVALUATION; CONTRIBUTING STUDENT PEDAGOGY; ONLINE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DRILLS; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; RATING; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79954427456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1953163.1953299     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5):427-441, 2002.
2. E. G. Barriocanal, M.-A. S. Urbán, I. A. Cuevas, and P. D. Pérez. An experience in integrating automated unit testing practices in an introductory programming course. SIGCSE Bull., 34(4):125-128, 2002.
3. C. Desai, D. Janzen, and K. Savage. A survey of evidence for test-driven development in academia. SIGCSE Bull., 40(2):97-101, 2008.
4. C. Desai, D. S. Janzen, and J. Clements. Implications of integrating test-driven development into cs1/cs2 curricula. In SIGCSE '09, pages 148-152, 2009.
5. C. Edmondson. Proglets for first-year programming in java. SIGCSE Bull., 41(2):108-112, 2009.
6. S. H. Edwards. Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their own programs. J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 3(3):1, 2003.
7. S. H. Edwards, J. Börstler, L. N. Cassel, M. S. Hall, and J. Hollingsworth. Developing a common format for sharing programming assignments. SIGCSE Bull., 40(4):167-182, 2008.
8. E. F. Gehringer, D. D. Chinn, M. A. Pérez-Qui nones, and M. A. Ardis. Using peer review in teaching computing. In SIGCSE '05, pages 321-322, 2005. (Pubitemid 40821263)
9. D. Janzen and H. Saiedian. Test-driven learning in early programming courses. In SIGCSE '08, pages 532-536, 2008.
10. A. Luxton-Reilly. A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education, 19(4):209-232, Dec 2009.
11. A. Luxton-Reilly and P. Denny. Constructive evaluation: a pedagogy of student-contributed assessment. Computer Science Education, 20:145-167, 2010. Accepted for publication.
12. T. J. Mccabe. A complexity measure. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, SE-2(4):308-320, 1976.
13. P. D. Palma. Viewpoint: Why women avoid computer science. Commun. ACM, 44(6):27-30, 2001.
14. N. Parlante. Nifty reflections. SIGCSE Bull., 39(2):25-26, 2007.
15. W. Perry. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years. Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York, 1970.
16. T. Shepard, M. Lamb, and D. Kelly. More testing should be taught. Commun. ACM, 44(6):103-108, 2001. (Pubitemid 33642856)
17. J. Spacco and W. Pugh. Helping students appreciate test-driven development (tdd). In OOPSLA '06 Companion, pages 907-913, 2006. (Pubitemid 46729419)
18. J. Spacco, W. Pugh, N. Ayewah, and D. Hovemeyer. The marmoset project: an automated snapshot, submission, and testing system. In OOPSLA '06 Companion, pages 669-670, 2006. (Pubitemid 46729347)
19. D. E. Stevenson and P. J. Wagner. Developing real-world programming assignments for cs1. In ITICSE '06, pages 158-162, 2006.