Limitations of transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies

Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 706-708

  Shinghal, Rajesh ^b   Terris, Martha K ^a  

^a VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0032856931     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00193-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schapira HE: Prostatic needle biopsy in patients after abdominoperineal resection. Urology 20: 76-77, 1982.
2. Lee JY: Technical tip: transperineal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate in the postprostatectomy patient. J Endourol 7: 75-77, 1993.
3. Twidwell JJ, Matthews RD, Huisam TK, et al: Ultrasound evaluation of the prostate after abdominoperineal resection. J Urol 150: 902-904, 1993.
4. Fornage BD, Dinney CP, and Troncoso P: Ultrasound-guided transperineal needle biopsy of the prostate after abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Ultrasound 23: 263-265, 1995.
5. Filderman PS, and Jacobs SC: Prostatic ultrasound in the patient without a rectum. Urology 43: 722-724, 1994.
6. Shinohara K, Tash J, Presti JC Jr, et al: Prostate cancer after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum: its diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Western Section of the American Urological Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 14, 1997.
7. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, et al: Random-systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided core-biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142: 71-75, 1989.
8. Schmid HP, and McNeal JE: An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 16: 184-191, 1992.
9. Terris MK, Hammerer PG, and Nickas ME: A comparison of ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing transperineal and transrectal prostate sonography. Urology 52: 1070-1072, 1998.
10. Eskew LA, Bare RL, and McCullough DL: Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157: 199-202, 1997.
11. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melmed J, et al: Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159: 471-475, 1998.
12. Seaman EK, Ihor SS, Fatal M, et al: Transperineal prostate needle biopsy guided by transurethral ultrasound in patients without a rectum. Urology 47: 353-355, 1996.
13. Kirby KA: Transperineal prostate needle biopsy guided by transurethral ultrasound in patients without a rectum (letter). Urology 49: 306, 1997.
14. Krauss DJ, Clark KG, Nsouli IS, et al: Prostate biopsy in patients after proctectomy. J Urol 149: 604-606, 1993.
15. Papinicolaou N, Eisenberg PJ, Silvermen SG, et al: Prostate biopsy after proctocolectomy: a transgluteal CT guided approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 1332-1334, 1996.
16. Mathews R, Pearle M, and Grayhack JT: Prostate biopsy in patients after proctectomy (letter). J Urol 151: 435, 1994.
17. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 49: 8-31, 1999.
18. Terris MK: Prostatic ultrasound in the patient without a rectum (editorial comment). Urology 43: 724, 1994.