Detection and solution of software performance antipatterns in Palladio architectural models

ICPE'11 - Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WOSP/SIPEW International Conference on Performance Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 19-30

  Trubiani, Catia ^a   Koziolek, Anne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Palladio component model; Performance antipatterns; Software performance feedback

Indexed keywords

ANTI-PATTERNS; ARCHITECTURAL MODELS; COMPONENT MODEL; DESIGN PROBLEMS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; SOFTWARE PROPERTIES;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 79953880789     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1958746.1958755     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. OCL 2.0 Specification, OMG document formal/2006-05-01, Object Management Group, Inc. (2006), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/06-05-01.
2. SAE, Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL), June 2006, as5506/1, http://www.sae.org.
3. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification, OMG document formal/05-07-04, Object Management Group, Inc. (2005), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05- 07-04.
4. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, 2004.
5. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. Journal of Systems and Software, 82:3-22, 2009.
6. S. Bernardi, S. Donatelli, and J. Merseguer. From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petrinet models. In WOSP, pages 35-45, 2002.
7. S. Boroday, A. Petrenko, J. Singh, and H. Hallal. Dynamic analysis of java applications for multithreaded antipatterns. In Workshop on Dynamic Analysis, pages 1-7, 2005.
8. W. J. Brown, R. C. Malveau, H. W. McCormick, and T. J. Mowbray. AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis. 1998.
9. V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, R. Eramo, A. Pierantonio, and C. Trubiani. Digging into UML models to remove performance antipatterns. In ICSE Workshop Quovadis, pages 9-16, 2010.
10. V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and C. Trubiani. Performance Antipatterns as Logical Predicates. In IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pages 146-156, 2010.
11. V. Cortellessa and L. Frittella. A framework for automated generation of architectural feedback from software performance analysis. In European Performance Engineering Workshop, pages 171-185, 2007.
12. V. Cortellessa, A. Martens, R. Reussner, and C. Trubiani. A Process to Effectively Identify "Guilty" Performance Antipatterns. In Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, pages 368-382, 2010.
13. B. Dudney, S. Asbury, J. K. Krozak, and K. Wittkopf. J2EE Antipatterns. 2003.
14. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
15. M. Hauck, M. Kuperberg, K. Krogmann, and R. Reussner. Modelling layered component execution environments for performance prediction. In International Symposium Component-Based Software Engineering, pages 191-208, 2009.
16. L. Kapova, B. Zimmerova, A. Martens, J. Happe, and R. H. Reussner. State Dependence in Performance Evaluation of Component-Based Software Systems. In WOSP/SIPEW, pages 37-48, 2010.
17. K. Krogmann, M. Kuperberg, and R. Reussner. Using Genetic Search for Reverse Engineering of Parametric Behaviour Models for Performance Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2010. accepted for publication, to appear.
18. A. Martens, H. Koziolek, S. Becker, and R. H. Reussner. Automatically Improve Software Models for Performance, Reliability and Cost Using Genetic Algorithms. In WOSP/SIPEW, pages 105-116, 2010.
19. M. Meyer. Pattern-based Reengineering of Software Systems. In WCRE, pages 305-306, 2006. (Pubitemid 47514657)
20. T. Parsons and J. Murphy. Detecting Performance Antipatterns in Component Based Enterprise Systems. Journal of Object Technology, 7(3):55-90, 2008.
21. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. Software Performance Antipatterns. In WOSP, pages 127-136, 2000.
22. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. New Software Performance Antipatterns: More Ways to Shoot Yourself in the Foot. In CMG Conference, pages 667-674, 2002.
23. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. More New Software Performance Antipatterns: Even More Ways to Shoot Yourself in the Foot. In Computer Measurement Group Conference, pages 717-725, 2003.
24. B. Tate, M. Clark, B. Lee, and P. Linskey. Bitter EJB. 2003.
25. N. Trcka, W. M. van der Aalst, and N. Sidorova. Data-Flow Anti-Patterns: Discovering Dataflow Errors in Workflows. In Conference on Advanced Information Systems, volume 5565, pages 425-439. LNCS Springer, 2009.
26. C. M. Woodside, M. Franks, and D. C. Petriu. The Future of Software Performance Engineering. In Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering, pages 171-187, 2007. (Pubitemid 47484924)
27. C. M. Woodside, D. C. Petriu, D. B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr, and J. Merseguer. Performance by Unified Model Analysis (PUMA). In WOSP, pages 1-12, 2005. (Pubitemid 44447376)
28. J. Xu. Rule-based Automatic Software Performance Diagnosis and Improvement. In WOSP, pages 1-12, 2008.